User talk:24.70.95.203

Unregistered editors using this IP address received messages on this talk page years ago. Since users of the IP address have likely changed, these messages have been removed. They can be viewed in the page history.

Proposed deletion of Info-TV

The article Info-TV has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There is no source to prove that this company exists.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Vanjagenije (talk) 18:05, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Włodzimierz Stanny

The article Włodzimierz Stanny has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one reliable source that directly supports material in the article. The nominator also raised the following concern:

All biographies of living people created after March 18, 2010, must have references.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. SwisterTwister talk 07:44, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Włodzimierz Stanny

The article Włodzimierz Stanny has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unable to find reliable, secondary sources which cover this human.

Well, who is this person, actually? Two months ago part of the text of a book he wrote was substituted in for most of the biography here, but in the book the information here is attributed to "Victor Carter". So, we have a copyright violation (probably) and quite possibly a hoax, too. Either of those might be reason to revert to an earlier state, rather than delete, but in terms of putting back together a reasonable biography, we should start with sources that evidence notability, I haven't seen those yet.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. joe decker ^{talk to me} 16:34, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of To Reign in Hell: The Exile of Khan Noonien Singh for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article To Reign in Hell: The Exile of Khan Noonien Singh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/To Reign in Hell: The Exile of Khan Noonien Singh until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -mattbuck (Talk) 10:36, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cheryl Kaye Tardif for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cheryl Kaye Tardif is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cheryl Kaye Tardif (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guy (Help!) 07:40, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Hoopy

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Hoopy, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. SEMMENDINGER (talk) 14:43, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pink TV (Serbia) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Pink TV (Serbia), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 05:05, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of To Reign in Hell: The Exile of Khan Noonien Singh for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article To Reign in Hell: The Exile of Khan Noonien Singh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/To Reign in Hell: The Exile of Khan Noonien Singh (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DonIago (talk) 13:38, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Permanent autonomous zone for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Permanent autonomous zone is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Permanent autonomous zone until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

C933103 (talk) 09:47, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, 24.70.95.203

Thank you for creating Permanent autonomous zone.

User:Ceyockey, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

This is being considered at AfD and even if it passes AfD, it will most likely do so as a redirect rather than an article.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ceyockey}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 02:08, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Stephen Murgatroyd for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stephen Murgatroyd is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Murgatroyd until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Tacyarg (talk) 14:25, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.