User talk:Aerchasúr

Welcome

Hello, Aerchasúr, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 00:51, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

January 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hope not Hate. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:00, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to John McGuirk, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 21:04, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Some advice: As mentioned in edit summaries, Wikipedia uses the term 'anti-abortion', not 'pro-life', for reasons I'd hope would be obvious. Please, do read WP:NPOV and WP:BLP. You can't just introduce content designed to disparage someone, when the reference you use does not back up the claim you're trying to make. Recent examples: Colm O'Gorman (Amnesty won their case); you can't claim that someone has "has links to radical left groups" and use an interview with the person as a reference, where their political affiliations are not mentioned once; as you did on the ARC article. Continue in this vein, and you will end up blocked for WP:BLP violations. New talk page sections go at the bottom of the page, not the top. And this page tells you how to properly cite a news article rather than using just a bare URL. There's a link on that page to the cite web template, too. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 00:18, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You haven't given ant justification for using the term anti-abortion. It isn't a neutral term and its not balanced to use the term prochoice but not prolife. Please do not mistake article corrections and improvements with attempts at disparaging edits. All of my edits on biographies are contributing to make a fairer portrait of the person or group and I try to use their own own words in so far as possinle. Thank you Aerchasúr (talk) 09:09, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

But if that doesn't work, you literally just change what the reference says, to suit your agenda? Got it. So far, in the past couple of days, you've dismissed a criticism section on one BLP as "a rambling chaotic mess of points" (it isn't), yet introduced just that on another. (Some of your additions to that page have since been 'rev deleted' by an admin; i.e., not just removed, but removed completely from the page history). BLP's of people working as a journalist are fine, but a published author and broadcaster merits this from you?! I am trying really hard to assume good faith, but at this stage, you're really making that difficult.

I will find you a link outlining the use of anti-abortion vs pro-choice. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 09:44, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Using the word crusade to describe at activity of a pressure group seems to imply religious or fanatic. Changing the wording campaigning making it more neutral. The section on the far right links is a chaotic mess. Whatever about Youth Defences history, the organisation has a narrow focus on abortion and a few other issues but the sections on alleged far right links is is nearly longer than the coverage of abortion which is really weird and comes across as a crude hatchet job. Emma Dabri isn't a broadcaster. She is a PhD student. Most published academics don't have wiki pages and she isn't even an academic yet. She is a student and I didnt try to delete her page. I just added to the discussion Aerchasúr (talk) 09:59, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You don't get it, do you? It's the text used by an external publication. You can't just change it because you don't like it. You just can't! C'mon, seriously - this is pretty basic stuff, and competence is required to contribute here. Emma Dabri is a broadcaster, and, more importantly, she's a published author, easily satisfying WP:GNG. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 10:29, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well I didn't think colunists were an acceptable source outside of quotes as they by definition partisan. I am restudying the acceptable sources page and one issue that concerns me on the youth defence page is that many of the sources are not meeting Wikipedia:Acceptable sources because they are not Traceable to the author(s). The national library reference is not Traceability to author and neither is the link to the the defaced website. Can you fix this? Aerchasúr (talk) 10:45, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We don't have to have author names. Quite often, newspaper or website articles won't have a by-line. We still use them. In the case of YD, the National Library of Ireland is the publisher, and that's fine. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 15:44, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And what's "Emma Dabri isn't a broadcaster. She is a PhD student" about? Did you even read the article? Which lists her broadcast work on BBC and Channel 4? Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 15:58, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The nugget of data from the National Libary isnt just authorless. It also does not proclaim to be published. Very unethical use of a 'source'. Do you have a conflict of interest?Aerchasúr (talk) 18:39, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No. Do you? Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 18:44, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. — Newslinger talk 13:50, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as at Talk:Project Veritas, (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. — Newslinger talk 13:51, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in abortion. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. — Newslinger talk 02:33, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pro-Life Amendment Campaign

I have rolled back your most recent edit at this article because I have found a reference to support the claim that the debate was acrimonious and added it. Autarch (talk) 15:38, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You need to restore my correction. Your new source the History mag article doesnt mention it being acrimonious. Aerchasúr (talk) 18:16, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

From the description in the reference it seems as if acrimonious was a reasonable summary. Autarch (talk) 00:20, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

To me that is a value judgment, editorialisation but I appreciate the engagement. Aerchasúr (talk) 00:58, 13 April 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Edit warring

Your recent editing history at Kilmainham Gaol shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. You have already been informed that gript.ie is not a reliable source. This is the current consensus of the WP community. Do not use it as a source, unless that consensus changes. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 14:12, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:IDONTLIKEIT isnt a valid reason to delete a citation.Aerchasúr (talk) 14:15, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Sex in a Cold Climate, you may be blocked from editing. In addition to the obvious synthesis issues, there are also clear neutrality issues, as discussed on the talk page. Please engage, per the WP:BRD process, rather than continuing your slow edit war. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 13:44, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Aerchasúr: I am an uninvolved administrator who has noticed the slow edit warring at Sex in a Cold Climate. You will be blocked if you repeat your edits without engaging in discussion on the article talk page. Challenged material is removed until it is supported by consensus. When disagreements occur, WP:DR must be followed. Study that page for information but it means attracting other opinions via a noticeboard or wikiproject or RfC (one at a time, not all at once). Johnuniq (talk) 23:36, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the comments and that is fine and all but it was alleged that my additions was original research. It is not. It was a quote from an accepted source, the Irish Times. I am happy to reach a consensus, as I always do but it has to be stressed Bastun's criticism's did not apply to my contribution. This Bastun's agenda to whitewash inconvenient stories, violating WP:POV Aerchasúr (talk) 23:49, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks you but you need to patiently explain that, with reasons/sources and without mentioning other editors, on article talk. Johnuniq (talk) 01:24, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And I would request that you actually read WP:SYNTHESIS before engaging on the talk page. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 11:20, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Edmond Cullinan

Hello, Aerchasúr,

Thank you for creating Edmond Cullinan.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

The references are about this person's books. These are primary - see WP:PRIMARY. These references are insufficient to satisfy either of WP:BASIC (for a living person) nor WP:NACADEMIC - notability for an academic.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 01:14, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the suggestions. I added more citation, not his own and added more of publications too. Aerchasúr (talk) 12:36, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eagleash was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Imbolc instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Aerchasúr/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Aerchasúr/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eagleash (talk) 12:27, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aerchasúr! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Eagleash (talk) 12:27, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Irish Church Music Association

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Irish Church Music Association requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 18:41, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:St Patricks Maynooth logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:St Patricks Maynooth logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:44, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Iirish Church Music association logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Iirish Church Music association logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:26, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Muintir na Tire logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Muintir na Tire logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:29, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Edmond Cullinan

The article Edmond Cullinan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

References show he is a priest but no much else.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. scope_creep^Talk 13:30, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Edmond Cullinan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Edmond Cullinan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edmond Cullinan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

scope_creep^Talk 00:10, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Irish Church Music Association logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Irish Church Music Association logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:07, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Irish College, Rome logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Irish College, Rome logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:31, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding User:Aerchasúr/sandbox

Hello, Aerchasúr. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Aerchasúr/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:06, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Aerchasúr/sandbox

Hello, Aerchasúr. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:49, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Missionary Sisters of St. Columban, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mary Patrick. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]