User talk:Ultra8K

October 2023

Hello, I'm Toadspike. I noticed that you recently removed content from Sinhala Only Act without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Toadspike (talk) 06:53, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The info that has been used isn’t true at all and has been debunked Ultra8K (talk) 07:19, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Sri Lankan Tamils. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 07:00, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi Ultra8K! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Wikishovel (talk) 08:33, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Invasion by Chola dynasty moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Invasion by Chola dynasty. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Wikishovel (talk) 08:33, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Invasion of Anuradhapura by Rastrakuta empire moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Invasion of Anuradhapura by Rastrakuta empire. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Wikishovel (talk) 08:33, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Invasion by Chola dynasty (November 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NotAGenious was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No sources? See WP:V and WP:INTREF

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Invasion by Chola dynasty and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

NotAGenious (talk) 11:23, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ultra8K! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! NotAGenious (talk) 11:23, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Invasion by Chola dynasty (November 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Invasion by Chola dynasty and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 16:39, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Invasion by Chola dynasty

The article Draft:Invasion by Chola dynasty was accepted in error as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation because it duplicates the topic of Chola conquest of Anuradhapura, it has now been made a re-direct to Chola conquest of Anuradhapura. Newystats (talk) 04:33, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What have you done Ultra8K (talk) 09:06, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

These two articles are completely different can you fix it back Ultra8K (talk) 09:06, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Newystats Ultra8K (talk) 09:29, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:Newystats can you fix the article it happened in two different time periods and has nothing to do with each other

Ultra8K (talk) 09:32, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ultra8K. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Izno (talk) 23:21, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't do this on purpose I basically lost count of the accounts I created so here's the problem there's a problem with the wiki login page if you have saved your password in the phone for wiki and if you try login again through the Face ID and when you press login the wiki will deny access after multiple times the wiki would ask me to write capitica code and to check if I'm human and when I keep on trying the Face ID the wiki will deny access until it asks me to try again later

So I know this is not too smart what have I done but I kept on creating new accounts everytime wiki askes for login so basically whatever article or the edit I have done will be in multiple accounts and I basically lost count of it but few days ago only I realized that you have to physically type the password rather than using the Face ID

I wasn't trying to sock puppet or anything I was trying to write articles in wiki and the reason why i didn’t accept it that was me in the other accounts were because I was embarrassed that I created multiple accounts just to get pass through the wiki login Ultra8K (talk) 13:25, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Ultra8K (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have proven my worth by creating a article and rewriting articles that already been created and before I got banned I was in a debate with a person regarding genetic studies and I have almost won and I can help wiki to improve a a lot especially in history side and I hope that I can get unbanned soon, if you guys doubt that I'm bad at punctuation and etc , you can check my article which I wrote.

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2= I have proven my worth by creating a article and rewriting articles that already been created and before I got banned I was in a debate with a person regarding genetic studies and I have almost won and I can help wiki to improve a a lot especially in history side and I hope that I can get unbanned soon, if you guys doubt that I'm bad at punctuation and etc , you can check my article which I wrote. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1= I have proven my worth by creating a article and rewriting articles that already been created and before I got banned I was in a debate with a person regarding genetic studies and I have almost won and I can help wiki to improve a a lot especially in history side and I hope that I can get unbanned soon, if you guys doubt that I'm bad at punctuation and etc , you can check my article which I wrote. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1= I have proven my worth by creating a article and rewriting articles that already been created and before I got banned I was in a debate with a person regarding genetic studies and I have almost won and I can help wiki to improve a a lot especially in history side and I hope that I can get unbanned soon, if you guys doubt that I'm bad at punctuation and etc , you can check my article which I wrote. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Ultra8K (talk) 09:37, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ultra8K (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

´ I didn't do this on purpose I basically lost count of the accounts I created so here's the problem there's a problem with the wiki login page if you have saved your password in the phone for wiki and if you try login again through the Face ID and when you press login the wiki will deny access after multiple times the wiki would ask me to write capitica code and to check if I'm human and when I keep on trying the Face ID the wiki will deny access until it asks me to try again later :So I know this is not too smart what have I done but I kept on creating new accounts everytime wiki askes for login so basically whatever article or the edit I have done will be in multiple accounts and I basically lost count of it but few days ago only I realized that you have to physically type the password rather than using the Face ID :I wasn't trying to sock puppet or anything I was trying to write articles in wiki and the reason why i didn’t accept it that was me in the other accounts were because I was embarrassed that I created multiple accounts just to get pass through the wiki login´

Decline reason:

You seem to be indicating you lack sufficient competence to use websites. If so, WP:CIR applies. If that is not what you are alleging, please make a new unblock request. Yamla (talk) 13:38, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ultra8K (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is my second time appealing and I would like to explain it properly here seem to be a problem with the wiki login page cause when you have your passwords saved to the web and when you use the Face ID in wiki it deny access telling it was a invalid password when it is the correct password and I was super annoyed by it so what I did was I created a account everytime wiki asked for login and later i realized that the Face ID dosent work for wiki and I forgot to delete my other accounts in wiki so basically i basically lost count of how many wiki accounts I have created and the previous admin said that I seem to be indicating I lack sufficient competence to use websites but now only I realized that wiki has a problem with this and later I realized that the only way to login to wiki is by physically typing the password so I would like to request from you to unblock me and I would promise to delete all my new accounts and I'm sorry for all the trouble I have caused Ultra8K (talk) 05:45, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

There is no means of deleting an account, you will just need to abandon and forget about the other accounts you created. I must concur with Yamla above in that you seem to lack the skills needed to participate here, at least at the level needed(you wrote your request without any punctuation, in one long sentence). 331dot (talk) 09:46, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please place new posts below existing posts, for proper discussion flow. 331dot (talk) 09:46, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]