Jump to content

Talk:Bai Hong

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot (talk | contribs) at 21:18, 11 January 2024 (Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 4 WikiProject templates. Merge {{VA}} into {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 3 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Biography}}, {{WikiProject China}}, {{WikiProject Women in Music}}.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

the source being used in this article.

[edit]

This is like using Wikipedia to source Wikipedia. Baidu Baike is an encyclopedia that anyone can freely edit so long as the Chinese government stays happy. I don't think this is one of those third-party sources that people talk about. Pandacomics 05:30, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I am aware of Baidu Baike. Think of this page as a translation. Look at Manchukuo Film Association for example. Pretty much anything that has been seriously censored need a starting point somewhere. Especially cultural materials from 1910 to 1950. Alot of the best English books on Chinese pop music barely even mention Zhou Xuan. Try finding info on Four Heavenly Kings of cantopop from non-tabloid magazines and fan sites. It is near impossible. The good news is there are tons of "greatest hits" CDs mentioning these artists. Benjwong 06:33, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It's a translation, yes, but using it as a citable source just raises some eyebrows. Finding info on the Four Heavenly Kings should not be that hard, seeing as both Jay Chou and S.H.E have news coming out of entertainment sections of news sites (e.g. Sina.com and Tom.com). Considering their fame, there should already be Chinese-language books on Andy Lau, at least. It's just a matter of whether or not you're going to bring yourself to buy a copy just for Wikipedia research. However, the fact that Baidu Baike is freely editable (i.e. is a background guide and not a definitive source, much like Wikipedia) and that information on celebrities is hard to find are two different things. As for the former, I think there are at least some things on Bai Hong from books or news. The Baidu editors must have gotten it from somewhere, after all. Pandacomics 07:16, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Most of the editors get this stuff from chinese newspapers and tabloid magazines. Which they don't reference cause everyone knows celebrity paparazzi are not any more reliable. BTW only a few articles like Bai Hong, Bai Guang were straight translated. I very well could have started the article, added a picture and called it a stub. There are plenty of books about the music industry, but few go in depth about the artist lives. Benjwong 15:18, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bai Hong. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:21, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wasn't "郎和姐儿" recorded in 1937, not 1938? 173.88.246.138 (talk) 12:04, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]