Jump to content

Talk:Epineurium

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot (talk | contribs) at 18:00, 14 January 2024 (Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 2 WikiProject templates. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 2 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Anatomy}}, {{WPNEURO}}.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

It

[edit]

It looks from my search as though it's not the same thing as neurilemma. Epineurium is around a whole nerve [1] [2] [3], whereas neurilemma (at least usually) is around an individual axon [4] [5] as described in the article neurolemma.dsws 04:52, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Continuous with which meninges layer?

[edit]

Is the epineurium really continuous with both arachnoid and dura? This source [6] suggests that the epineurium is composed of the dura only and the perineurium is composed of both pia and arachnoid. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.254.153.159 (talk) 00:57, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I can't read your reference (don't have the book), but I suspect you're right, and the statement you're contesting is still here, years later. I find two additional relevant references having to do with the Transition Zone from the central nervous system to the peripheral, including some pictures, but I don't really understand them. They are:

https://www.nysora.com/foundations-of-regional-anesthesia/anatomy/histology-peripheral-nerves-light-microscopy/ (picture in section: THE CENTRAL-PERIPHERAL TRANSITION REGION), and,

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/47809832_The_Blood-Nerve_Barrier_Structure_and_Functional_Significance ,
(section: 2.1 Spinal Roots; and, picture, Fig.1: The relationship of peripheral nerve and spinal root connective tissue ensheathments to the meningeal coverings of the spinal cord )

Perhaps someone who knows more about this could review and correct? UnderEducatedGeezer (talk) 23:38, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Planned Edits/ Future Bibliographic Sources

[edit]

The source below and its corresponding information has already been approved by Wikipedia.

Saladin, Kenneth (2014). Anatomy & Physiology: The Unity of Form and Function. USA: McGraw-Hill Science. pp. 484–485. ISBN 0073403717.


This citation below is not from a primary research article, but is more of a review/informative article. I plan to write 2 additional paragraphs based on the article's content, which I have not yet published.

Payne, Samuel H. (2001). "Nerve Repair and Grafting in the Upper Extremity". Journal of the Southern Orthopaedic Association. 10 (2). Medscape: 1–7. Retrieved 22 March 2015.

My last citation below and it's information will be used to write one additional paragraph.

Kulkarni, GS (2009). Textbook of Orthopaedics and Trauma. India: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publication. pp. 895–898. ISBN 9350908522.

Thanks for posting this, Tpaly12. Wikipedia has been made by editors like you and I so there's no "approved" sources, just the ones that others before us have used. I look forward to your edits. --Tom (LT) (talk) 07:43, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Epineurium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:16, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]