Talk:Gansen-ji
Appearance
A fact from Gansen-ji appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 July 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Did you know nomination
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Vaticidalprophet (talk) 09:44, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the Japanese Buddhist temple of Gansen-ji has a 275-centimeter-tall (9.02 ft) statue of Amitābha Buddha that was created in the year 946? Source: The year created is verified on page 50 of Minamoto, Toyomune; Henderson, Harold Gould (1935). An Illustrated History of Japanese Art: "From an inscription on the inside of the head of this statue we learn that it was made in 946." The size is verified with this source: https://www.google.com/books/edition/Sculpture/6GED_E3hB4oC?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=Gansen-ji&dq=Gansen-ji&printsec=frontcover
Created by Aoidh (talk). Self-nominated at 02:08, 20 June 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Gansen-ji; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing: - n
- Neutral:
- Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: @Aoidh: Good article. Though "Gansen-ji has a wooden Japanese pagoda, two stone pagodas, and a stone chamber that have each been recognized as Nationally Designated Important Cultural Property." should be cited. Also, citation 8 should have a page number. Onegreatjoke (talk) 01:57, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Onegreatjoke: Thanks, I've copied the references from the subsequent sentences in that section to append to that sentence as well, and added the page number to the book (until I looked with fresh eyes I couldn't figure out how to tell what page that was). - Aoidh (talk) 03:02, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
- Approve. Onegreatjoke (talk) 02:30, 25 June 2023 (UTC)