Talk:Name of Ukraine
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Name of Ukraine article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 90 days |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
“Usage of article” reference
The intro contains a link to a Google ngram to indicate historical usage of “the Ukraine.” It’s a terrible link, because the compared option for “the Ukraine” includes every occurrence of “Ukraine”: Ngram: The Ukraine,Ukraine.
This sort of direct personal research doesn’t belong in the encyclopedia. Here’s a better search which compares two mutually exclusive subsets of usage, and yields a very different graph: Ngram: of the Ukraine + in the Ukraine + from the Ukraine + to Ukraine,of Ukraine + in Ukraine + from Ukraine + to Ukraine.
I removed the link. My example is better, but also doesn’t belong here as a reference. —Michael Z. 2018-03-29 16:06 z
Controversial etymology: poor reference
A reference is given to counter, or to attest to Russian scholars countering, Pvitorak’s assertion that tsarist Russia imposed a false interpretation on the name. This refers to what I believe to be a Russian article on documents relating to the battle of Molodya?/Molodin? in 1572. It is unhelpful to anyone incapable of studying or unwilling to study the document in the original language. My impression is that the source does not address Pvitorak’s assertion; if so this reference seems to be implicitly proposing an interpretation of some part of the documents to contest Pvitorak’s assertion, which would be an improper use of the source. It needs a translated excerpt and a reformulation to clarify and justify the claimed counter. PJTraill (talk) 13:11, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- B-Class Ukraine articles
- Top-importance Ukraine articles
- WikiProject Ukraine articles
- B-Class Linguistics articles
- Low-importance Linguistics articles
- B-Class etymology articles
- Etymology Task Force articles
- WikiProject Linguistics articles
- B-Class Middle Ages articles
- Low-importance Middle Ages articles
- B-Class history articles
- All WikiProject Middle Ages pages