Jump to content

Talk:Day of the Jackanapes

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot (talk | contribs) at 12:00, 13 February 2024 (Maintain {{WPBS}}: 3 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "GA" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 3 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Television}}, {{WikiProject Animation}}, {{WikiProject The Simpsons}}.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Good articleDay of the Jackanapes has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 26, 2011Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Day of the Jackanapes/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: GRAPPLE X 22:36, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    Nothing major to fix, just a few small changes.
    "Luckily, Krusty's trained chimp Mr. Teeny sees the life-threatening explosives, which he throws into the network executives' office, killing them, though, they reconstitute themselves." -> I know you explain this later, but you could probably do with clarifying what you mean by "reconstitute themselves" here since it's the first mention.
    "He announces his departure of the Krusty the Klown show after the executives give him notes during filming of a sketch" -> should be departure from.
    DVD Talk's Jason Bailey wrote that both "Insane Clown Poppy" and "Day of the Jackanapes" "really shine" -> if you phrase it as "DVD Talk's Jason Bailey wrote that this episode and "Insane Clown Poppy" both "really shine"" then you lose the awkward-looking consecutive quotation marks.
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
    MOS is fine.
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
    Citations are fine, no problems here.
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
    Scope is grand.
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
    Article seems neutral.
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
    History is stable.
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
    N/A.
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    Just going to hold this until the 1A fixes are seen to. If you want to add an image from some of the free images of Kelsey Grammar or Al Jean, feel free, but it's entirely optional. GRAPPLE X 22:36, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Since Queenieacoustic has been inactive for a few weeks I went ahead and fixed the problems. I removed the mention of the executives reconstituting themselves from the Plot section since that's not an important part of the storyline. Thanks for the review! Theleftorium (talk) 16:27, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good to me. Was going to fix it myself if I hadn't heard back within the week, so you've saved me the effort. :P Ready to pass this one now. Well done both of you, then. GRAPPLE X 17:40, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Day of the Jackanapes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:25, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:37, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Day_of_the_Jackanapes&oldid=1206897298"