Talk:Double Dragon Advance

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Merger

This really isn't a new game, not in the sense of being a true sequel. It's a new (enhanced) port, and as such should be part of the main article on the first game, not split off on its own.oknazevad (talk) 21:06, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. Its essentially a remake of the original arcade game, but I also think its different enough from the original to warrant a separate article at least, just like Castlevania Chronicles (remake of Castlevania) or the Nintendo DS version of Final Fantasy III. Jonny2x4 (talk) 22:38, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, didn't realize that Chronicles was on a separate page from Castlevania.

It makes sense not having separate pages for ports, but enhanced remakes are more puzzling. They are, essentially, ports of the same game, which implies that they should be on the same page, but remakes of movies get their own, separate page, like King Kong and King Kong.

I guess the real question is which model to follow. Are they the same game appearing on a new platform, like any other port? Or are they different creative works, like a film remake? As I write this, my thoughts now tend toward separate pages. But I think we should leave the proposal up for a bit more to see if there are any other comments.oknazevad (talk) 21:01, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Double Dragon Advance. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080201101104/http://www.gameinformer.com:80/Games/Review/200310/R03.1014.2033.38722.htm to http://www.gameinformer.com/Games/Review/200310/R03.1014.2033.38722.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:45, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]