Jump to content

Talk:Paul Hasluck

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot (talk | contribs) at 05:23, 15 February 2024 (Maintain {{WPBS}}: 4 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 2 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Biography}}, {{WikiProject Australia}}.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

The Holt/McMahon/McEwen/Gorton affair

[edit]

When the Prime Minister Harold Holt died in December 1967, Hasluck was determined that the Treasurer, William McMahon, of whom he had a very low opinion, should not become Prime Minister. Although he had no great ambition to be Prime Minister himself, he put his name forward mainly to provide an alternative to McMahon. But many Liberal MPs saw him as too old at 64 and too conservative to compete with the Labor leader, Gough Whitlam, and they chose the younger and more aggressive John Gorton.

This gives a very inaccurate picture of what happened. It excludes any mention of John McEwen, who was actually PM between Holt and Gorton (albeit not for long), and his crucial role in ensuring that McMahon did not become PM. Afaik, McMahon was not even a candidate at the January 1968 election at which Gorton was elected, because McEwen had publicly stated back in December 1967 that he and his Country Party would not serve in any coalition government that was led by McMahon. The January election was between Gorton and Hasluck, not between Gorton, McMahon and Hasluck. The Hasluck-McMahon mutual dislike was certainly part of the overall picture, and it might have played a more significant part if McEwen had not snookered McMahon in December. But he did. -- JackofOz (talk) 01:04, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I've added the appropriate words. -- Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 22:07, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Place of Birth

[edit]

The infobox lists his place of birth as Gosnells, but the article lists Fremantle. While these two places are close-ish (about 20k apart), they are NOT the same place. Was he born in Gosnells or Fremantle? Grover (talk) 02:19, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Paul Hasluck/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Needs detailed referencing and sections.--Grahamec 12:52, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 12:52, 1 February 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 02:27, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Bibliography

[edit]

I have commenced a tidy-up of the Bibliography section using cite templates. Capitalization and punctuation follow standard cataloguing rules in AACR2 and RDA, as much as Wikipedia templates allow it. Feel free to continue. Sunwin1960 (talk) 06:40, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Paul Hasluck. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:28, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]