This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lancashire and Cumbria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lancashire and Cumbria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Lancashire and CumbriaWikipedia:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaTemplate:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaLancashire and Cumbria articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Museums, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of museums on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MuseumsWikipedia:WikiProject MuseumsTemplate:WikiProject MuseumsMuseums articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
I came across this due to an copyright investigation. There certainly was some identifiable CV, which I have sought to remove. But I ended up doing rather a bigger trim than intended. This was mainly because:
The CV, for example, the Interior section was very reliant on this source, [1];
The History section was, for me, very confused. Firstly, there was a great deal of extraneous detail Secondly, there was a lot of repetition, particularly around the Declaration of Sports and the Sirloin steak anecdote, the latter having both text in the body, and a footnote covering exactly the same point. This also meant that the chronology was rather haphazard;
Shakespeare - this was also somewhat confused, and I remain puzzled. There is material on the internet that show plans for an ambitious Shakespeare Centre at Hoghton. Was this ever built? If so, it surely deserves a mention.
Sources - some were offline, some of the online ones were corrupted, one sending me a batch of malware from Indonesia (I removed that one). This made checking difficult.
So, my apologies if other editors think I have taken a rather bigger axe than was warranted. Material can go back in, of course, subject to sourcing and appropriate paraphrasing. KJP1 (talk) 11:12, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Go on, I’ve give you the 4,000 panes! The Shakespeare definitely needs some more looking into. As far as I can see, it was first suggested in the 30s, then rubbished for the next 60 years, and now has had something of a resurgence. There’s a 20 year old Guardian article that talks of plans for a Shakespeare theatre/study centre to rival Glyndbourne!, but it can’t have been built, otherwise we’d know about it? And yet that company is intriguing. Needs some more OR. KJP1 (talk) 12:48, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Was the copyrighted text lifted almost directly from the sourced material? Given that an individual who has edited this article a lot in the past has been previously banned for such exploits, I'm concerned about the ramifications of leaving said text as part of the article's edit history. Seasider53 (talk) 17:21, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Personally, I don't think the scale warrants rev. del. under RD1. It was one paragraph, included in one section, and it's gone. KJP1 (talk) 06:36, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What are "the ramifications" exactly? That the publisher, e.g. BBC in this case, opens legal proceedings for copyright violation against WMF? I've asked this question in the past and have been told "that's not the kind of judgement" that editors, including Admins, are eligible to make. It would be question for the WMF legal department. But I guess Admins who are experts on copyright will have a rule of thumb to apply in such cases. Martinevans123 (talk) 11:27, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
