Jump to content

User talk:FactFinder1402

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by FactFinder1402 (talk | contribs) at 13:36, 28 February 2024 (→February 2024: Reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Hello, Kavehkdf1402, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 19:46, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Commercial activity (November 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
You should not use sv.wikipedia as a source.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Vanderwaalforces (talk) 18:48, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Kavehkdf1402! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Vanderwaalforces (talk) 18:48, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Commercial activity (November 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 19:46, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Commercial activity (November 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by BuySomeApples was:
Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a dictionary. We cannot accept articles that are little more than definitions of words or abbreviations as entries. A good article should begin with a good definition, but expand on the subject. You might try creating a definition for this instead at Wiktionary, which is a dictionary. Please only do so if it meets that sister project's criteria for inclusion. These require among others, attestation for the word or phrase, as verified through clear widespread use, or its use in permanently recorded media, conveying meaning, in at least three independent instances spanning at least a year.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
BuySomeApples (talk) 00:15, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Commercial activity (December 12)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Cambalachero was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Dictionary definition, the right article is Commerce
Cambalachero (talk) 19:40, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Hi Kavehkdf1402, I notice that you've been adding links to multiple articles, which is usually helpful, but you're often linking to basic words and terms that any average English reader already understands. Our guidelines recommend that we do not add links to these kinds of basic terms; see MOS:OVERLINK. Thanks, R Prazeres (talk) 19:56, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Commerce shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. MrOllie (talk) 12:35, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, you have started this edit war, and you have reversed several of my edits for completely ridiculous reasons. I talked to you about this behavior last month, but it didn't seem to have any effect.Anyway, if this process continues, I will definitely talk to the managers about it. Thanks Kavehkdf1402 (talk) 12:46, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your edits are not improvements to Wikipedia and were correctly reverted. You should go ahead and talk to 'the managers about it' right now, because I am absolutely not going to stop reverting edits that make the encyclopedia worse whenever I happen to see them. MrOllie (talk) 12:57, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your personal opinion is not supposed to be everyone's opinion, especially since you don't know the difference between a boat and a commercial ship. This is not a personal attack, but a fact that matters. I suggest you edit on topics you know enough about.If you intend to help improve this encyclopedia, then you should make appropriate edits, not prevent it from improving. Kavehkdf1402 (talk) 13:08, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Empty threats and personal attacks will not help you get your way on Wikipedia, and prefacing a personal attack with 'This is not a personal attack' is not a shield from complying with Wikipedia's policies. MrOllie (talk) 13:13, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Dear friend, my edit is completely scientific and correct. If you still think there is something wrong with it, you can search in the sources instead of reverting immediately. Thanks Kavehkdf1402 (talk) 13:27, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm waiting to hear from 'the managers'. MrOllie (talk) 13:28, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much. Kavehkdf1402 (talk) 13:36, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:FactFinder1402&oldid=1210817068"