Talk:Westerwald
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article contains a translation of Westerwald from de.wikipedia. |
comments
[edit]This is a wonderful article, for the most part nicely written and illustrated, and thorough in its coverage of the Westerwald. For the B class rating, the article could use additional citations and a copy edit. The copy editing needs are minor, but would help to sharpen the prose, prior to a GA assessment.
A few karst caves are of interest to spelaeology and bring about the temporary disappearance and reappearance of the Erdbach. this sentence is confusing. What temporarily disappears and reappears? The stream travels underground? A few karst caves are of interest to spelaeology (why?). The Erdbach flows partly above ground, and partly below ground, through these caves....?--Auntieruth55 (talk) 15:58, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
Assessment comment
[edit]The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Westerwald/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
needs improved citation and minor copy edits. very nice article. --Auntieruth55 (talk) 16:07, 15 June 2009 (UTC) |
Last edited at 16:07, 15 June 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 10:27, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Portal:Westerwald for deletion
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5f/Ambox_warning_orange.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_orange.svg.png)
A discussion is taking place as to whether Portal:Westerwald is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The page will be discussed at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Westerwald until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the page during the discussion, including to improve the page to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the deletion notice from the top of the page. North America1000 20:55, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
Condition of the external links...
[edit]Greetings, everyone. All of the external links seem to be dead. To those who added them, especially the German language links - please search for them again as they may have been moved or there may be be similar links that express what you had in mind. Thank you, Wordreader (talk) 02:47, 22 August 2019 (UTC)