Talk:EPOXI

Spaceflight Mid‑importance

	Spaceflight portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

‹See TfM›

Physics B‑class Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
B	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New NASA mission

EPOXI is a new mission using an existing spacecraft, Deep Impact. It was announced in NASA Press Release 07-147. An extract follows...

NASA GIVES TWO SUCCESSFUL SPACECRAFT NEW ASSIGNMENTS

WASHINGTON -- Two NASA spacecraft now have new assignments after successfully completing their missions. The duo will make new observations of comets and characterize extrasolar planets. Stardust and Deep Impact will use their flight-proven hardware to perform new, previously unplanned, investigations.

I've made a brief start and will add some more details and a reference next.--Chris Jefferies 22:38, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm... Having started this new article I'm not sure whether it would be better to keep everything within Deep Impact. I'm going to hold off adding any more detail until there are comments from others. Which way should we take this? Perhaps I got overexcited when I saw the NASA press release :-( --Chris Jefferies 22:59, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The new mission has a webpage... epoxi.umd.edu 129.2.14.148 18:23, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

While it is the same spacecraft, it has new objectives/targets. In addition the spacecraft has been renamed and the mission itself is called EPOXI. Deep Impact is done. Elizabeth 68.84.3.185 (talk) 02:55, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, at one point, they thought they were going to change the name of the spacewcraft, but then decided not to... The name of the spacecraft is still the Deep Impact flyby spacecraft. 68.84.3.185 (talk) 23:44, 18 July 2008 (UTC) Elizabeth[reply]

Keep the new article.LanceBarber (talk) 08:41, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stunning video of moon transiting Earth

There's an amazing quicktime video at

http://www.nasa.gov/mov/260503main_red_green_blue2.mov

from EPOXI, of the moon transiting Earth. I checked with Nancy Jones at NASA and she told me that the video is public domain but should be credited to:

Credit: Donald J. Lindler, Sigma Space Corporation/GSFC; EPOCh/DIXI Science Teams

Can someone convert this video into a Wikimedia Commons-friendly format and upload? Spikebrennan (talk) 18:53, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The mission webpage has animated gifs available. 68.84.3.185 (talk) 23:44, 18 July 2008 (UTC) Elizabeth[reply]

EPOXI Earth and Moon

http://www.nasa.gov/topics/solarsystem/features/epoxi_transit.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by Root Beers (talk • contribs) 05:14, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

EPOCh paper

See this paper for more on EPOCh http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=4839704&tag=1 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.79.176.244 (talk) 22:27, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

EPOXI's next mission

I understand after EPOXI's succesful comet Hartley flyby the spacecraft lacks enough fuel for any major trajectory changes could NASA use its telescope cameras to search for trojan asteroids in Earths,Mars or Venus neighborhoods. Jalanp2 (talk) 18:50, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On November 25 the spacecraft had to be decommissioned. [1] — Fjörgynn (talk) 11:10, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The referenced fact sheet says the spacecraft was planned to be decommissioned on or about Nov 25. But a statement by the project manager, Tim Larson, at a post flyby news conference indicated that the spacecraft's fate is still under consideration. "NASA's looking at future uses, but that won't be decided for a little while... We're looking forward to hearing some good ideas," [2].--agr (talk) 14:58, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, we're still flying.137.78.36.246 (talk) 23:31, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Combine with Deep Impact

The is essentially an extension of the Deep Impact mission sans the impactor. Should the articles be combined into a joint article? It seems trivial for them to be separate and yet be the same craft and somewhat similar objectives. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Xession (talk • contribs) 08:49, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely not. Deep Impact and EPOXI are completely separate missions with vastly different objectives. EPOXI is not an extension of Deep Impact, but a Mission of Opportunity that makes use of an existing spacecraft. I believe that different pages are a necessity.137.78.36.246 (talk) 23:31, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New data released from EPOXI

EPOXI recently released images taken of astrophysical objects by the spacecraft. Read more here: http://epoxi.umd.edu/3gallery/deepsky.shtml

The mission has also made the images available to the public for an "image processing challenge" http://epoxi.umd.edu/3gallery/deepsky_challenge.shtml

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on EPOXI. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:48, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on EPOXI. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:03, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]