Talk:Chronotype

A fact from Chronotype appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 6 November 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that your biological chronotype characterizes your morningness or eveningness?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2007/November.

Wikipedia

Physiology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysiologyWikipedia:WikiProject PhysiologyTemplate:WikiProject PhysiologyPhysiology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
	This article has not yet been associated with a particular area.

Time Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Time, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Time on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TimeWikipedia:WikiProject TimeTemplate:WikiProject TimeTime articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Psychology Mid‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Adding to WikiProject Psychology

I agree -- this is a pretty well-developed page (no longer start class, IMHO!). We will be adding links to other Wiki pages about specific measures and related topics in psychology, too. Looking forward to it! Prof. Eric A. Youngstrom (talk) 13:45, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

I've just started this article. More to come: history, researchers, assessment tools, references etc. Hordaland 10:02, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done, now, except perhaps for a couple of External Links. So now people are welcome to tell me what I've done wrong -- or maybe even right?

Hordaland 19:35, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have done an excellent job, Hordaland, I feel that I have learnt a lot more about this topic, including up-to-date scales to assess chronotype (those more up-to-date than the Horne-Ostberg Scale). I was especially interested to see the reference to creativity and chronotype. This article is well-referenced, clearly written and contains good coverage of the topic - it is a good example of what all Wikipedia articles should be like! ACEOREVIVED 20:19, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gosh. (Blushing) Thanks.

What's so great about Wikipedia is that one can work in a flash of "inspiration" on something intensely interesting. 'Twould be a drag to have to, by someone else's deadlines. Hordaland 10:07, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just a thought, but are articles supposed to be written in the first person, albeit plural (maybe other species use Wikipedia and find it offensive?) I would say nix the we's, maybe switch to 3rd person. Ben 02:50, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good point. Fixed. (I hope I got 'em all.) Hordaland 16:04, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sleep deprivation

I agree that chronic sleep deprivation isn't the key to whether extreme eveningness is a disorder or not. Lots of people avoid the worst sleep deprivation by sleeping, say 4-7 a.m. plus 5-11 p.m. However, this does not allow, IMO, normal participation in society. The key, in any case, is whether one sufficient sleep episode within times considered to be normal, can or cannot be achieved.

Additionally, sleep-wake is not the only activity affected by chronotype; it's just the most obvious. Hordaland 16:18, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent points. I like the current wording. Cheers, Kla’quot (talk | contribs) 06:47, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Segmented Sleep

I don't want to disrupt the authors' good work on this article, but I feel it should discuss segmented sleep. The article currently states: "Normal variation in chronotypes encompasses sleep/wake cycles that are from about two hours earlier to about two hours later than average;" add to this segmented sleep, "typically individuals slept in two distinct phases, bridged by an intervening period of wakefulness of up to an hour or more." A very simplistic view of this gives the following sleep pattern from various people in a social group, S=Sleeping, A=Awake:

SSSSASSSSAAAA (-2)

ASSSSASSSSAAA

AASSSSASSSSAA

AAASSSSASSSSA

AAAASSSSASSSS (+2)

Notice that someone is awake at all times. This seems an important safety "feature". Q.v.: http://www.myzeo.com/sleep/knowledge-center/articles/eight-hour-night-really-myth http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-16964783 http://www.history.vt.edu/Ekirch/sleepcommentary.html These were merely the most easily Googled references. As I recall, an anthropologist living with an isolated, "unscheduled" tribe was pulling an all-nighter and noticed their segmented sleep, that is, noticed everyone spent a significant amount of time awake and active in the middle of the night. She(?) emailed all the other anthropologists working with isolated tribes: All(!) of them reported the same pattern. Laguna CA (talk) 07:53, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Missing

IMO, the Munich Chronotype Questionnaire, MCTQ (Roenneberg 2003), deserves a good deal more attention here. ~~Also Till Roenneberg is worthy of an article in (English) Wikipedia;~~ he's done some huge studies involving thousands of people. --Hordaland (talk) 15:05, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

How strange. I searched for 'till roe' and found nothing. Looked at the German article on him & from there clicked 'English' and got to our article! Software glitch? We do have the article Till Roenneberg. --Hordaland (talk) 15:16, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chronotype. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927034423/http://www.absm.org/PDF/ICSD.pdf to http://www.absm.org/PDF/ICSD.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:29, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious

Article needs further citations and verifications

Article disputed

Unverifiable information Tpaclatee (talk) 15:28, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What do you want to discuss? The dubious tag is for cited information that is implausible. You don't need the tag to start a discussion, you can do that here. 2603:7081:1603:A300:8448:8888:CC8F:BC90 (talk) 13:56, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]