Jump to content

Talk:Rhodesia at the Olympics

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by PrimeBOT (talk | contribs) at 12:31, 10 April 2024 (top: Task 42: add WikiProject improvement parameter). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Move discussion in progress

[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Rhodesia at the 1928 Summer Olympics which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 22:16, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Rhodesia at the Olympics/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 18:35, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Will complete this one soon. JAGUAR  18:35, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • "The dominion did not appear at the Games again under that banner until 1960" - unclear, what banner? Southern Rhodesia or just Rhodesia? Also link 1960 Summer Olympics
  • "best result until it became Zimbabwe in 1980" - link Zimbabwe
  • "including a field hockey team, to the 1964 Summer Games" - link 1964 Summer Olympics
  • "In 1965, Prime Minister Ian Smith" - link Ian Smith
  • "Hall, for example, won a gold medal in the welterweight division of the 1930 British Empire Games" - I would start this sentence with his first name (Leonard) included as it was confusing for a while
  • "In 1965, Southern Rhodesian Prime Minister Ian Smith declared a unilateral independence from Great Britain" - this would be the United Kingdom in this instance, as 'Great Britain' only refers to the the team
  • "Despite political machinations from Great Britain" - same again
  • No dead links
  • No dab links

This is looking good. I couldn't find any issues while spotchecking the sources and the article is well written. I only pointed out a few minor concerns like underlinking and clarity, but once they're clarified this should be good to go. JAGUAR  19:01, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Jaguar: Thanks for review! I think I have addressed all of these concerns, so please let me know what else needs to be done! Canadian Paul 12:23, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for addressing them! With all of those minor issues out the way this should be good to go. JAGUAR  13:10, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]