User talk:Tamtam90

Now I'm blocked almost from every social network; hence, any post "from me" everywhere, but in Wikipedia (from now), wouldn't be mine.

July 2015

Hello, I'm Flyer22. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to List of unsolved problems in mathematics because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Flyer22 (talk) 02:56, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bratsk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Luger. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:48, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Wikipedia:Reviewing, the guideline on reviewing
Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators. Widr (talk) 22:06, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! --Tamtam90 (talk) 22:14, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Tamtam90. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Square-free integer are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. In this case, there's a math reference desk specifically at Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Mathematics Deacon Vorbis (talk) 02:54, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your notice. I've added the reference desk page to my watchlist. --Tamtam90 (talk) 00:26, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Tamtam90. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merging of Template:Infobox folk song

Template:Infobox folk song has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox musical composition. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:16, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Tamtam90. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pozhalostin Museum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Imperial Porcelain Factory. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:49, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Revert on Pozhalostin Museum

Why did you revert my edit? It was just spelling and grammar fixes.

Please, introduce yourself. --Tamtam90 (talk) 21:39, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Your edit looks like a WP:VAND:

1. No need to describe all your "improvements". --Tamtam90 (talk) 21:46, 13 October 2020 (UTC) How is that vandalism? The article was extremely difficult to read due to very weird grammar and word choices, so i fixed them. "Most of such items"? No one talks like this. -Sophia (talk) 01:08, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:46, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Apricot edit

Hello - on my talk page, you said: Good afternoon. Why have you reverted my addition right after the publication, though I provided 3 links to scientific journals?

The sources you added are not WP:MEDRS reviews, and the content is misleading. There are no medicinal properties of apricots or its seed extracts. We do not cite traditional medicine sources because they are pseudoscience and quackery. Please do not edit war, WP:WAR.

Zefr (talk) 18:37, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Zefr, hi here. Sorry for the "delay". There are some official (not traditional) sources which say the opposite, in particular, Japanese, Russian (see the section "Economic importance and application" with its links). --Tamtam90 (talk) 20:39, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If there isn't a reliable source in US or European medical literature, then it likely isn't worth trying to make a point about health effects. Think of the practical side of the issue - what would be the economic benefit of grinding up apricot kernels to make a medicine? Zefr (talk) 21:18, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]