Jump to content

Talk:Democratic Yemeni Union of Peasants

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by DYKUpdateBot (talk | contribs) at 00:01, 2 June 2024 (Article appeared on DYK on 2 June 2024, adding {{DYK talk}}). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 17:59, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 7, 1986 congress of the Democratic Yemeni Union of Peasants
October 7, 1986 congress of the Democratic Yemeni Union of Peasants
Moved to mainspace by Soman (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 377 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Soman (talk) 15:45, 14 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

New reviewer needed. Z1720 (talk) 13:58, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Soman: I've given this a review. I'm ready to pass this, but I'm blah on the hook. Do you have any others? Also, you need to anser the question about when it closed, or if it still exists. --evrik (talk) 18:16, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • I'd say that the connection between the national constitution and a civil society organization is the most hookworthy factoid here. The only other option I see would the arrest of the chairman in 1978 or the cooperation agreements with East Germany. As per the closure of the organization, I don't have any source of an exact date of disbanding and it is quite likely that there was no official or formalized disbanding. When South Yemen ceased to exist, presumably the organization went quietly defunct. --Soman (talk) 10:43, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      • Can you propose some alt hooks? Also work into the piece that, "it is quite likely that there was no official or formalized disbanding. When South Yemen ceased to exist, presumably the organization went quietly defunct." --evrik (talk) 15:30, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
        • I can't add speculation in the article mainspace, without any reference. I think it is clear from context that the organization ceased to function at some point around Yemeni unification, but the reader will have to connect the dots. --Soman (talk) 22:19, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • This hasn't moved in nine days, and I think evrik's position on the hook is within bounds for reviewer's discretion. Soman, would you have a way to improve the current suggestion, or would you like to try something else? theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 19:18, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • I don't really see the need for an alt hook, but here is one:
I note that there has still not been any assessment of any of the DYK criteria, I'd invite new reviewers. --Soman (talk) 20:45, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Soman and Evrik: As written, this would deserve {{too many sections}}, and another sentence in the lead wouldn't go amiss. Can these short sections be knocked together?--Launchballer 10:37, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Launchballer: I've never heard that one before. Okay, I reorganized it and removed a section. --evrik (talk) 16:12, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fine by me.--Launchballer 16:15, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]