Talk:Forex scandal

Updates needed

This article is OUT-OF-DATE:

1. More investigation and fines have been imposed since this article was written (e.g. European Union Commission on Competition's investigation on FX manipulations concluded in 2021, etc).
2. Many court complaints have been filed by pensioners and investors, globally, including at the Southern District of New York since 2016 (e.g Allianz Global Investors Et al v. Bank of Americap Corp. Et al).
3. More arrests of FX traders have been made at those banks by authorities since 2018 (e.g. United States v. Aiyer).

Etc.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FB91:1C75:1AFF:2438:3DDE:F620:841 (talk) 23:55, 11 August 2023 (UTC)

Vandalism or not?

I am unsure whether this quote is genuine, or genuine but misplaced, or a hoax or vandalism.

Secret trading chatrooms

Dont want other numpty's in mkt to know [about information exchanged within the group], but not only that is he gonna protect us like we protect each other…

Citibank trader — on prospective new member to the cartel chatroom

References

Important contextualisation : What has been the estimated cost of the fraud ?

I see the Forex scandal is at least a decade long manipulation of $5.3 trillion-a-day foreign exchange market, and lead to $5.7billion fine. Ok. But what is the overall estimated cost of the fraud ? Yug (talk) 09:12, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Agreed It is important to show how the fine relates to the crime, and without even an estimate of how much illegitimate money was made the $5.7 Billion is meaningless. I imagine they made a lot more than 5.7 Billion, but that is merely conjecture.Fractal618 (talk) 11:20, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

There are regulations involved in the supposed oversight agencies which are supposed to be monitoring the "financial industry" in the United States which precludes divulging the full extent of the financial rewards/gains coming from these criminal activities, regulations imposed specifically to hide the fact that these fines are symbolic and meaningless, so unless we have a whistle blower willing to divulge that information or unless we have Anonymous hack-n-crack suitable servers holding that information, it is not likely that citizens will ever be informed. Damotclese (talk) 16:09, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Forex scandal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141115011002/http://www.finma.ch:80/e/aktuell/Pages/mm-ubs-devisenhandel-20141112.aspx to http://www.finma.ch/e/aktuell/Pages/mm-ubs-devisenhandel-20141112.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:03, 3 January 2017 (UTC)