User talk:Belbury
This is Belbury's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 100 days ![]() |
|
||
This page has archives. Sections older than 100 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
WP:BLOCKEVASION
Hello, what does this mean? 2A02:C7C:74AD:AF00:6524:AAF2:BF99:20F0 (talk) 17:47, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
- @2A02:C7C:74AD:AF00:6524:AAF2:BF99:20F0. WP:BLOCKEVASION means Block evasion when someone evades a ban. 220.240.159.198 (talk) 09:10, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Upscaled images
Template:Upscaled images has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Rejoy2003(talk) 17:26, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Re: Revert
So, the account I found was @b2coull (with the video here), not @billycoullofficial. The two accounts seem to be the same guy, based on images of him in various news articles about this event. The b2coull account also has videos with him talking, whereas billycoullofficial only has three posts and nothing since August of last year. If you in fact think that the account you cited is the only real one, I would like to hear your line of thinking. Schiffy (Speak to me|What I've done) 15:33, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Schiffy: Thanks for giving a link! @billycoullofficial was all I could find. @b2coull is a joke video, it looks and sounds nothing like Coull, who's appeared in videos eg. https://news.stv.tv/west-central/willy-wonka-chocolate-experience-boss-truly-sorry-after-chaos. I guess this guy either shares a name with Coull and thought it would be a funny thing to do, or changed his username and/or display name for the sake of the joke. Belbury (talk) 15:42, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
I hope you're happy
I hope you're happy for making my life hell. Always reporting my accounts and getting me banned. After I worked all night on improving a page, not getting a single bit of a sleep to do it, you come and revert everything and ban me. Yes. I am a sockpuppet. I have a mental health disorder and I won't stop my dream of editing and improving Wikpedia. I am only 18 years old and feel like my life is over when you report my accounts and revert all my changes. All that hard work. For nothing. I didn't sleep this morning because I was worried you'd come along and revert everything and ruin every inch of me. I got up and instantly checked because I know you like to cause me such dismay and ruin my life. You have been ruining my life ever since 2020.
So well done. Everyone hates me and wants me dead on here now. Hope you're happy with what you've done to me and my mental state. I was still in secondary when I got banned from Wikipedia in 2020. Yes, I was in secondary school! I made mistakes and I'm not perfect. I'm not a monster and just want to live my dream.
Lam312321321 2A0A:EF40:E6B:8001:204A:6C98:376E:51B3 (talk) 16:39, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) Hello IP 2A0A! Wikipedia is not therapy. If you want to continue to edit, I'd recommend making an unblock request from your oldest account. The request needs to be sincere and prove that you will no longer make disruptive edits or do sockpuppetry. —asparagusus (interaction) sprouts! 16:47, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Spicy ban me. I don't care anymore. I'm using my friend's WIFI right now so you don't list it for people to target! Because I know someone once said that I need to be taken down with force.
- I'm never going to return anymore, but please remember that in all of this, there was always good intentions. I was never troll. Just a lost person who wanted to edit my interests and hobbies that I have knoweldge about. Yep. I made mistakes. And I'm not proud of it. But please don't make out that I'm evil or bad for what I've done! Yes, I broke the rules on using different accounts. I did it just because I wanted to escape the real world and do what I love doing.
- I am a human and yes I am a sockpuppet. But I broke the rules for the first time for a miss-understanding and later for copying content from other pages without credit.
- I'm off to Fandom to help edit a history wiki there :) 2A0A:EF40:E6B:8001:204A:6C98:376E:51B3 (talk) 16:50, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- The advice you were given by admins at User talk:FloTheGreat#Blocked as a sockpuppet in 2021 still holds here. Take a genuine six-month break from Wikipedia and ask for the Wikipedia:Standard offer in September.
- Nobody's calling you evil, we're just routing quickly around edits that clearly go against basic Wikipedia policy. If you want to contribute constructively to English culture articles, request an unblock. If you have some principled or personal reason for not wanting to do that, okay, but whatever that is it's not compatible with how Wikipedia operates. Belbury (talk) 19:03, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 9
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Prince Charles Cinema, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cinema.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:03, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot")
Hey! Hello. You say: <<Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. I have reverted your edit.>>
So, why don't you check this?
I rechecked it all 5 days in a row. And I myself corrected every word in this formulation. Do you have any criticism of my wording or remarks on the topic? 95.25.77.155 (talk) 14:44, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Good idea moving the warning labels into a table. Thank you for your contribution! Are you interested in adding 3 example images, one for each label? eximo (talk) 18:19, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- @PaladinOfDaedalus: No opinion, really! If you've got some images in mind and want help in adding them, though, let me know. Belbury (talk) 18:54, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Music of Dance Dance Revolution for deletion
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5f/Ambox_warning_orange.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_orange.svg.png)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Music of Dance Dance Revolution until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Loyalmoonie (talk) 19:03, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
Accidental reversion
Apologies, didn't notice that the version I was working off on Hannah Schmitz left out the primary sources tag you had added. Not sure why I didn't see an edit conflict warning. Thanks for putting it back. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 14:52, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Sirfurboy: All good, I've missed some edit conflicts myself lately! Belbury (talk) 14:58, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Stop
Stop reverting my edits on Sinapali 2A0A:EF40:E11:A701:24E0:98E:952E:EE38 (talk) 10:12, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- You're restoring edits by blocked user User:Iptesh Kumar Meher. If that's your account, you need to log in and request an unblock. Belbury (talk) 10:14, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- That's my account . Stop reverting! 2A0A:EF40:E11:A701:24E0:98E:952E:EE38 (talk) 10:15, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- It's not your account. But stop it. Belbury (talk) 10:19, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- That's my account . Stop reverting! 2A0A:EF40:E11:A701:24E0:98E:952E:EE38 (talk) 10:15, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
I've added your talk page to the p-block list of the IP range. Favonian (talk) 11:26, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks. Belbury (talk) 12:02, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
To address about wikipage edit
Hii , Belbury
I need to talk about the wikiproject we are assigned under that me and 4 more people including Dhanya Suthar (whose edit you removed ) ,would add some "false awakening" related paragraphs from articles published in pubmed about it which might include protoconsciousness theory , and actually Dhanya forgot to add about reference to his paragraph but please it is a humble request that don't remove those edit , we will surely add citations and references accordingly , but this wikipage is pre decided to edit , and if you don't allow our topics to be displayed it might lead to unwanted consequences for future , so please don't delete those edits , we would edit appropriately, nothing will be wrong which we would add so please co-operate. Rathod Dharmarajsinh (talk) 11:01, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Rathod Dharmarajsinh: Hi Rathod. Is this a student project?
- The warning template your friend received says
if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so
, so they can just do that. Belbury (talk) 11:05, 27 March 2024 (UTC)- Yeah it is medical students related project.
- Thanks for the reply. Rathod Dharmarajsinh (talk) 11:08, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for supporting us
You marked FA's wikipage under education that is so good , thank you for that. Rathod Dharmarajsinh (talk) 02:25, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
About FA wikipage
Hii Belbury
Dhruv my groupmate added about hypothesis and with reference then why did you remove it? He is last to edit in our project then we can submit our project and I will add some final touch in it to confirm that wikipedia policies are not violated so please before removing it add a msg to me so I can edit any inappropriate mistake by Dhruv. Rathod Dharmarajsinh (talk) 06:29, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Where is Kate? for deletion
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5f/Ambox_warning_orange.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_orange.svg.png)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Where is Kate? (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.IgnatiusofLondon (he/him • ☎️) 12:22, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
About my images that have been deleted from World Trade Center wiki page
Hi,
I saw how you reverted my contribute to the gallery on the WTC 1973-2001 page. Thank you for telling me the images are copyright but I just want to say I got around 10 images from NIST releases, which says "Public domain mark 1.0".
I can agree that I did upload some images found from elsewhere, which are probably copyright. But is it okay if I add the NIST images since they are not copyright.
-Varenimo Varenimo (talk) 22:33, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Varenimo: Thanks for the clarification! From a look at the NIST website I'm not sure it's true to say that every photo in their collection is public domain, but I'll raise a deletion discussion on Commons about it. Belbury (talk) 08:04, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, thanks for the response!
- Where can I find the deletion discussion? I am new so I don't know how to travel around this site.
- Some of my photos that I uploaded were not deleted, mostly my NIST uploads were not deleted. Can I upload the photos that are okay onto the WTC wikipedia? Varenimo (talk) 12:07, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- You should have had a notification over at Commons. The NIST discussion is at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Varenimo - please do correct me if I've misunderstood the nature of the archive.org subset!
- Unless there's some urgency to having the photos in the article immediately, I'd wait to see how the NIST discussion goes before adding the photos back. Belbury (talk) 12:27, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hi! Its been almost a month and I see there has not been anything on the discussion. I want to add the photos but I know your better at this stuff so I want to hear your opinion. Varenimo (talk) 09:29, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Commons deletion discussions can take a long time to resolve, sadly!
- It might help if you posted something to the discussion saying why you believe the images are all public domain. Other users and admins could be waiting to see your point of view before getting involved. Belbury (talk) 11:34, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hi! Its been almost a month and I see there has not been anything on the discussion. I want to add the photos but I know your better at this stuff so I want to hear your opinion. Varenimo (talk) 09:29, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Removed my photo
I saw you removed my skiing photo. I guess I'm not photo-worthy for the Wikipedia article about ski goggles and helmet 🤣
Maybe my next goal should be to become a professional skier, so I look more professional on camera! Félix An (talk) 02:19, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- All a matter of composition rather than subject! But best of luck with the skiing career. Belbury (talk) 08:18, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Johnny somali
I received your message about Johnny Somali and your removal of an edit on his wiki page, emphasizing the importance of maintaining a "neutral point of view."
Johnny Somali is known for spreading false information without substantial evidence. The claim of him being a "Somali child pirate" lacks credible support and appears to be part of his persona as an online celebrity and troll.
It's essential to provide accurate and honest information to prevent readers from believing such unfounded claims about his background. Bluenosezulu (talk) 19:09, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- The article says
Ismael says that he was a Somali child soldier
, which is not inaccurate. - If he's known for lying about his past to the point where reliable sources have written about that, please do add that to the article. Without that context, Wikipedia shouldn't take its own view on a person's statements by describing him as "claiming" things rather than "saying" them. Belbury (talk) 19:30, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for the reply, will definitely amend it in accordance of what you said :) Bluenosezulu (talk) 19:45, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Excuse me..
I made this image and I can do and post whatever I want with it, the DeviantArt post is from MY account..
Thank you! RUI Thomas Fan (talk) 20:17, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- @RUI Thomas Fan: Hi, I don't know which of your deleted uploads you're referring to, but you can post to Commons:Undeletion requests if you think something was removed in error. Belbury (talk) 06:10, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Michael Myers (Halloween)
Michael Myers (Halloween) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. 🥒Greenish Pickle!🥒 (🔔) 05:39, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Incorrect Info
hi, you reverted the "Everyone Knows That" wiki page due to "the sources don't appear strong enough yet to rewrite the article with the film source as fact" I can in fact confirm that everyone knows that IS in that movie at 1:07:30. Brandon44401 (talk) 21:26, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Orpington & District Amateur Boxing Club
Draft page
Please add citations and help get ready to post. Box32 (talk) 13:28, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Box32: You should add all the newspaper sources that you were using for reference when you wrote the article, it doesn't seem like a great use of my time to track down those same sources from scratch. Belbury (talk) 14:04, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- I have now added all the papers from archives, is the page now ready for the main site ? Can you help please ? Box32 (talk) 14:19, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Orpington_%26_District_Amateur_Boxing_Club
- this is now the updated draft , is this ok ? Box32 (talk) 14:37, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Looks like it got feedback from a reviewer when you submitted the draft. Best of luck with it. Belbury (talk) 17:18, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Question about changing positions of sections
hi. I have a question. Can users change position of a section on a Wikipedia article. Thanks Donteatgarlic (talk) 16:25, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Donteatgarlic Sure! There are some strict rules for where sections like "See also" and "External links" should go (you can see the list at MOS:SECTIONORDER), and certain types of article like biographies might have guidelines for what order to list things like personal life and career and discography sections, but otherwise it's largely up to editors.
- Be WP:BOLD and make a change if you think it improves an article. If somebody disagrees, they'll tell you why! Belbury (talk) 16:34, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks.how do users change positions of sections? Donteatgarlic (talk) 17:49, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Donteatgarlic Just click the edit link at the top of the page, and cut and paste the section into whichever place you want it. Headings are marked with equals signs around them
==Like this==
Belbury (talk) 17:52, 15 May 2024 (UTC)- Thank you for the help Donteatgarlic (talk) 18:26, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Donteatgarlic Just click the edit link at the top of the page, and cut and paste the section into whichever place you want it. Headings are marked with equals signs around them
- Thanks.how do users change positions of sections? Donteatgarlic (talk) 17:49, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
My edit
Why did you undo my edits? Was there an issue? 2A0A:EF40:E81:7701:1061:3825:F5D5:2BE6 (talk) 10:53, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Luxembourg rebellions
User LuxembourgLover has removed the AI-flag from the article Luxembourg rebellions. I do not know enough about AI to make any useful comments about that. But I know the way LuxembourgLover messed up texts and misinterpreted sources to be extremely cautious. Can you check if the removal of the flag is correct? The Banner talk 22:29, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- The same happened here: History of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. The Banner talk 22:42, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hey, I just wanted to let both of you know that I used AI to assist with spelling and grammar when working on those articles. I first created a rough draft and then used ChatGPT with sources to help me fix the grammar and spelling. The AI took my draft and combined the sources I provided, in the case of the Luxembourg article, some newspaper articles, and created the updated information that I then added to Wikipedia. LuxembourgLover (talk) 23:28, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Including the incorrect source??? The Banner talk 00:32, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- What source was incorrect? LuxembourgLover (talk) 18:34, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- The correction here. The Banner talk 19:34, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- “The political future of Luxembourg” from the Times covers the singing of Marseillaise and the members of the committee. LuxembourgLover (talk) 19:42, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- The correction here. The Banner talk 19:34, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- What source was incorrect? LuxembourgLover (talk) 18:34, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Including the incorrect source??? The Banner talk 00:32, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hey, I just wanted to let both of you know that I used AI to assist with spelling and grammar when working on those articles. I first created a rough draft and then used ChatGPT with sources to help me fix the grammar and spelling. The AI took my draft and combined the sources I provided, in the case of the Luxembourg article, some newspaper articles, and created the updated information that I then added to Wikipedia. LuxembourgLover (talk) 23:28, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- @The Banner: The thing to check is whether the AI-assisted text introduced any false information, and I don't know enough about the subjects to judge that. But it would be better for a second editor to review and remove these templates, rather than LuxembourgLover reviewing and approving their own flagged work - especially if you have concerns that either the editor or AI has misinterpreted some of the sources. Belbury (talk) 08:37, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Artificial intelligence art
Not only did you remove the link but you removed the edit. You have a Wiki page about AI art that doesn't have a single mention of AI art generators, which is needed to create AI art. It's like having a page about video games and not ever mentioning the consoles needed to play them. I added the link because there isn't a Wiki page for the term AI art generators. Escapecapsule (talk) 15:33, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Escapecapsule: No strong view on the meaning behind it, I was reverting the addition of a blog link around a particular keyphrase, and a sentence which didn't flow into the next one. Feel free to expand the section while drawing from reliable sources. --Belbury (talk) 16:02, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Colin The Caterpillar
Dear Sir/Madam, I understand your reasoning for removing my addition, however, the gentleman I refer to is my grandfather and I have documentation to prove that he named and created Colin the Caterpillar.
He held many senior positions within the food manufacturing industry, including one where he presided over the creation and the naming of Colin the Caterpillar cake in order to gain a contract with M&S for their cake production. I would be grateful for some advice on how to ensure this remains as this is very important to me that my grandfather is recognised for his part in Colin the Caterpillar.
Kind regards,
Nicholas Washington-Hadley Nickwashingtonhadley (talk) 22:51, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Tone on Nick Simmons (politician)
I restored your recent maintenance tag (tone) on Nick Simmons (politician) [1]. It had been removed without explanation or any sign of addressing the issue. When I read the article, though, I couldn't quite see what the concern was. A couple words like "tapped" and "stint", I saw as maybe somewhat informal. If you let me know more specifically what you thought needed improvement, I can take a crack at editing it. Cheers. signed, Willondon (talk) 16:30, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Willondon: Thanks, it was mostly vibes-based from a skim of the text, which just felt a bit too much like campaign literature. Going back with a pen I'd also underline "born and raised" and the repeated use of his first name "Nick". Belbury (talk) 16:39, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- OK. It did seem a little campaigny to me, but I didn't see any outright hyperbole. I'll make some edits later on today and remove the tag. I won't object if you still think there are concerns and want to put the tag back. signed, Willondon (talk) 17:16, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Willondon: I guess lines like
Nick worked to implement policies including the investment of hundreds of millions of dollars into growing the state’s economy, improving Connecticut’s infrastructure and schools, training thousands of workers to fill open jobs, and transitioning to a clean energy future
feel a little weaselly for being ongoing work on aspirations (is Connecticut in a clean energy future yet?) rather than a list of measured achievements. And these should really be coming from somewhere better than a press release from his boss. In fact, most of those claims aren't even in the source, which I've now flagged up. - I'll keep the article on my watchlist and take another look at it after you've edited, at some point. Belbury (talk) 17:30, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Willondon: I guess lines like
- OK. It did seem a little campaigny to me, but I didn't see any outright hyperbole. I'll make some edits later on today and remove the tag. I won't object if you still think there are concerns and want to put the tag back. signed, Willondon (talk) 17:16, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
HELLO BELBURY
Hello Mr. Belbury I've made some corrections with the market reviews because I'm Doing digital and physical network marketing and I've claimed this data from internet on the basis of my research and I've provided some data sources also. If you are unable to understand my sources pls can you contact me or leave me your contact no. or social media handle. Like : Instagram, Twitter, Discord, Whatsapp. Or if you don't want to contact pls recorrect my data I've Provided. Pls Sir, I know that wrong information can destroy a men. But trust me it is not the wrong data sir. Okk Sir. Pls let it done Sagarswamimfev (talk) 08:21, 5 June 2024 (UTC)