User talk:Resistme

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around.

Here are some tips to help you get started:

To sign your posts (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use ~~~~ (4 tildes).
Try the Tutorial, and feel free to experiment in the test area.
If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk
Follow the Wikipedia:Simplified Ruleset
Eventually, you might want to read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines.
Remember Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!

Good luck!

Meelar (talk) 21:17, 22 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The good and the bad

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labelled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

When you leave the edit summary blank, some of your edits could be mistaken for vandalism and may be reverted, so please always briefly summarize your edits, especially when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. --GraemeL ^(talk) 23:29, 26 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for the Newcomer Award - I saw loads of missing information on Glasgow and thought about adding them - major pages I've edited include Demographics and Climate in the main Glasgow page, created a Geography of Glasgow, Glasgow Festivals, and articles of the missing Glasgow Cathedral, St Lukes, plus loads of other smaller stuff. Resistme 12:21, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

SCWNB

Hi. If you create a new (Scottish or Scotland-stuff-related) article, you may wish (entirely your option) to list it at Wikipedia:Scottish Wikipedians' notice board/New articles. I've already added some of your recent additions there. -- Finlay McWalter | Talk 17:23, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sources for Glasgow Festivals

Hello, good work on Glasgow Festivals, and thanks for the contribution. However, you forgot to add any references to the article. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and there is currently a push to encourage editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. What websites, books, or other places did you learn the information that you added to Glasgow Festivals? Would it be possible for you to mention them in the article? Thank you very much. - SimonP 06:27, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - I'm still in the midst of creating the article Resistme 12:16, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

List of Dr. Who Films up for speedy deletion

A tag has been placed on List of Dr. Who Films, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

redundant, as information is already in other articles

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Stuart DD _{contributions} 12:33, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of Dr. Who Films is now an AFD

The article List of Dr. Who Films has now been changed to an AFD - see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Dr. Who Films. Feel free to contribute. Stuart DD _{contributions} 14:00, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of Dr. Who Films

An editor has nominated List of Dr. Who Films, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Dr. Who Films and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 16:31, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Torchwood

Are you proposing to write an article "Time agent"? Because until there is one, wikilinking just produces a redlink, which does not help the reader. Also, there is too much plot about Captain Jack Hart; that section is supposed to be about him, rather than describe in detail what he does. That sort of thing should be in the episode description, and probably already is. It doesn't need saying twice. --Rodhullandemu (Talk) 00:00, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a new article about the Time Agency and linking Time Agent to it.Resistme (talk) 00:05, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fine, no problem --Rodhullandemu (Talk) 00:07, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:Weevils Stories

Template:Weevils Stories has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you.

Time Agency

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Time Agency, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 20:29, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

While admittedly not much is currently known about what The Time Agency does, or did, as Captain John Hart will reappear in another two espisodes of Torchwood, it is extemely likely further details of the Time Agency's purpose and aims will emerge.

I am willing to add a placemark for the future development as a stub, based on future information on a forthcoming tv series Resistme (talk) 18:18, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Time Agency

An article that you have been involved in editing, Time Agency, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Time Agency. Thank you. Stuart DD _{contributions} 10:54, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Glasgay! logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Glasgay! logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:09, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2012

Thank you for your edit to the disambiguation page Something Special. However, please note that disambiguation pages are not articles; rather, they are meant to help readers find a specific article quickly and easily. From the disambiguation do's and don'ts, you should:

Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
Use short sentence fragment descriptions, which should not end with punctuation
Use only one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry, and avoid red links
Do not pipe links—keep the full title of the article visible
Do not insert external links

Thank you. Muhandes (talk) 19:15, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Victoria Bridge, Glasgow, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Walker (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:43, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Link updated. Thanks

King's Bridge, Glasgow

Hello Resistme. I've noticed that major part of the content is directly copied and pasted from the City Council's web pages. Have you seen this? --Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 15:24, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No problems - have amended the text and from other sources. Resistme (talk) 16:34, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Auchenshuggle Bridge (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to M8, M74 and Kingston Bridge

King's Bridge, Glasgow (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to A74

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Beaufort scale

Hey there, I noticed you adding a Beaufort scale template to a lot of articles. I'd just like to let you know not to use it too much or without thought. In the case of Storm Abigail, there is no mention of Beaufort scales anywhere in the article. I think what you intended the template for is to help readers understand what "force 10" or "force 11" is without reading the Beaufort scale article. However, since the storm article never talks about wind speeds in the Beaufort scale, it has the opposite effect and causes confusion. I'm sure there are some uses for it, but just noticed on Abigail, it's not appropriate or at least not yet. Jolly Ω Janner 00:07, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As I added the Beaufort Force already to Storm Abigail and Storm Barney, I wanted to include a Beaufort scale template to the article as well, similar to that for Saffir-Simpson Hurricane scale template, making it easier to add to future Storms as well.

Saffir–Simpson scale
TD	TS	C1	C2	C3	C4	C5

Hope this makes sense? It took me ages to build! Resistme (talk) 01:12, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It makes sense. My concern is that the Saffir-Simpson scale is widely used to categorise hurricanes, however the Beaufort scale is more often used for sea conditions and rarely used by forecasters when describing the intensity of a storm. That being said, I am interested myself in seeing whether Wikipedia can move to a way of measuring storm intensities for the UK. There doesn't seem to be a system in place at the moment, but I think Beaufort could be the best one. I may think about integrating it into a new Infobox for them. I've also adjusted a style for tracking maps of the storm to be more inline for extropical storms at Commons:User:Jolly Janner/Sandbox. Jolly Ω Janner 01:26, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weather forecasts tend to just use the generic "Gale force" and "Storm Force" winds in the weather forecasts, but these do relate to the Beaufort scale bands. I did try to edit the Infobox for storms to add the Beaufort scale, but it didn't work! Bit to advanced for me! Took me ages to build my first collapsible template table, but infoboxes are bit to advanced for me! Resistme (talk) 01:37, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, I was hoping that the Beaufort scale could be used to classify and compare historical storms as well, but as I couldn't amend the Infobox ... Resistme (talk) 01:37, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Re your Commons:User:Jolly Janner/Sandbox, good template but might I suggest you add storm force as well, as they use gale force (8-9), storm force (10-11) and hurricane force warnings (10)? Resistme (talk) 01:43, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

With regards to the infobox, my initial plans are to make a new one from scratch rather than editing {{Infobox storm}}. I find the current infobox tries to encompass every type of storm possible and a new style just for European windstorms may bring more uniformity to such articles. I was planning on colour coding the top bar by the maximum Beaufort scale achieved, similar to hurricanes. I have some experience with infoboxes, but it may still take a bit of time before one is ready. I think with the start of storm seasons in the UK, the need is now. With regards to tracking maps, there is a type of software used for them, which is integrated with tropical cyclones, so maps will be produced according to the Saffir-Simpson scale. I simply converted the SS scale to Beaufort, since they follow similarities. See User talk:Supportstorm#Extropical cyclone tracking maps for more info. Jolly Ω Janner 02:47, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Jolly Ω Janner 23:12, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

2015–16 Great Britain and Ireland floods

added a link pointing to River Dee

2015–16 UK and Ireland windstorm season

added a link pointing to River Dee

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Resistme. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Resistme. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Scottish Gaelic place names, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clarkston (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:31, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:20, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Beaufort scale template

Template:Beaufort scale template has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:40, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Beaufort scale small

Template:Beaufort scale small has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:43, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Weevil stories

Template:Weevil stories has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 22:14, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]