Jump to content

User talk:Luigifan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Sonicrules3 (talk | contribs) at 11:08, 4 July 2007 (→‎friend). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Please keep an eye on this page, as I will frequently reply here (before finding your own talk page,) and, if I still don't get a reply, potentially creating a crapflood. Sorry, folks, but I'm a bit impatient. Just ask the folks at the Moogle Cavern. I believe that you could also just talk to Blaze and H Hog if you want more information on the Moogle Cavern, as they both happen to be members there.

Hello Luigifan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Here are some recommended guidelines to help you get involved. Please feel free to contact me if you need help with anything. Best of luck and happy editing! Havok (T/C/c) 11:28, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting your info out there
Getting more Wikipedia rules
Getting Help
Getting along
Getting technical

What

who the hell are you and what do u want.

I could say the same to you. --Luigifan 12:23, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My response

Please look at my response on User talk:Eagle_101. Thanks —— Eagle (ask me for help) 00:26, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AfD Nomination: Sonic: The Fated Hour

I've nominated the article Sonic: The Fated Hour for deletion under the Articles for deletion process. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Sonic: The Fated Hour satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. I have explained why in the nomination space (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sonic: The Fated Hour. Don't forget to add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of each of your comments to sign them. You are free to edit the content of Sonic: The Fated Hour during the discussion, but please do not remove the "Articles for Deletion" template (the box at the top). Doing so will not end the discussion. Hbdragon88 20:17, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

lol moderator

I only wish I as an administrator/sysop. Nope. I'm just an ordinary Wikipedian, just like you. Hbdragon88 22:54, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Prestige Class

.*waves* Did you finally work out what you were doing with the template? It took me a while too, actually, although I don't think my edit summories were quite so amusing. I thought I should let you know I removed duelist from the list since it's still a red link. If all the class from this list were added I think the page might be just a little too long. Morgrim 15:21, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Right, saw you'd changed the link. I look forwards to seeing what you do with the duelist article, and I added it to my WIP template. Morgrim 02:25, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Spacing out

I am curious why you are adding spaces and a bot is taking them out. Ideas? ... aa:talk 05:00, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Because it's proper grammar to double space after every period, exclamation mark, or question mark. Actually, that goes for whenever you end a sentence, unless it starts a new line (by which I mean hitting the Enter key, not the limits of the computer monitor,) or if it starts a new paragraph. Why those bots don't have proper grammar within their programming, I have no clue... --Luigifan 20:04, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style_archive_(spaces_after_a_full_stop/period). It doesn't matter in the end, but note that double spacing after a period is a North American practice. ColourBurst 05:28, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

edit content

Hello, Luigifan. I noticed your changes to Candidiasis [1]. Thanks for contributing here. I was wondering why you made so many edits to the document, rather than encapsulating all the changes in a single edit. It makes it easier to track what's been changed when more changes are committed per single edit. Also, I want to thank you ver much for using clear edit summaries. That bit saves me a lot of time when I am trying to go over a large list of changes. Thanks again for contributing (Candidiasis is unfortunately one of my favorite subjects). ... aa:talk 05:36, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I made so many edits because I kept forgetting minor details! I know, it's a bit embarrassing, huh? Hopefully my contributions page isn't too cluttered! :p --Luigifan 20:00, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
And, I'm currently doing a science project on Candidiasis, or, rather, the systemic version, so I was spending a lot of time at the page.
I've rephrased you're paragraph on Candidiasis so that it's not touting a controversial point of view that much. Now it may be touting the scepticist point of view too much :). If you think so go ahead and try to find a middle ground. --Cyhawk 21:08, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, it looks excellent. --Luigifan 01:45, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate the article/Marioween Discussion

But I'm not entirely sure it should be on Wikipedia, since the game isn't out yet. It's one thing to put an official game up on Wikipedia before it's release, but a fangame? Wikipedia likes having proof that something is notable. And while certainly the game is notable to you now, to a large portion of planet earth, it unfortunately is not. Should I ever get the game out and it gains enough popularity, perhaps then it'll deserve it's own article, but right now? I don't think it does, sorry. BlazeHedgehog 00:03, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Did you like the additions to the storyline that I proposed? (Personally, I think it would be interesting to bring back the Grand Battle Kukku the 15th and the Battle Bird Army, or to incorporate Mammoth Mogul into the game...) I still have the article on Microsoft Word, but I won't put it up, with respect to your opinions. --Luigifan 01:03, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I really have my own plans for the plot and have had for a very, very long time. About MarioWeen: Read the manual. There's a move in there I describe with the bunny ears that helps solve the problem in the Ghost House. BlazeHedgehog 20:04, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Do your own plans have anything to do with Dracula? --Luigifan 02:01, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
That move works with Mario with the Bunny Ears, but not for Luigi! --Luigifan 21:56, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Are you sure you have the latest version (1.04)? MWNDX.exe's "last modified" date should be October 11th, 2005. I just booted up MarioWeen and tried it, and 1.04 fixes the spring bug, I believe. BlazeHedgehog 00:05, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oh yeah, and: To get the real ending, either set your computer's clock to October 31st, or just wait for it to happen legitimately. There's other holidays that give you secret levels, too (Christmas and April fools). BlazeHedgehog 00:24, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
October 31st? I KNEW IT!!!!!! The evil castle arises on Halloween night, so that's when Mario can enter and confront the Count!!!! --Luigifan 01:46, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. I just got the real ending, and, I have to say, I have no clue what it's supposed to mean. Where the heck is Princess Peach? How the heck did Luigi end up in the Death Egg? And, what the heck is Able Juice? Is this just because I beat the game with Luigi? What the heck is going on?!? --Luigifan 02:01, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reposting/"Reviving" deleted content

Please note that reposting or "reviving" (as you called it) deleted articles after they have gone through the Articles for Deletion process will be speedily deleted. --Wafulz 15:57, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Judging from your posts on the AfD discussion last time, I think you might be unclear about what does and does not belong on Wikipedia. Every article on the encyclopedia has to meet a few basic policies, ie verifiability, no original research, neutrality, What Wikipedia is not, etc. For specific things like websites, video games, or people, we have actual guidelines developed. In the case of Sonic: The Fated Hour, we use WP:SOFTWARE to help us judge whether or not the game will be able to meet the above policies. Typically, fan games and game mods need to be extraordinarily popular, or they have to have several non-trivial third party publishings about them, like a gaming magazine writing a full article on it. If you have any questions feel free to ask me. --Wafulz 16:04, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

YOur edits to User:Chadbryant

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. yandman 07:45, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism warnings

Warning vandals is a good thing, but comments like this are utterly inappropriate. Never, ever, make threats—even in jest. This is especially important when dealing with AOL IP addresses; the person reading your message is almost certainly someone other than its intended recipient. Kirill Lokshin 03:07, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry about it Luigifan. I got EXACTLY the same thing. But the truth is there. You can't keep saying the same thing as vandals ignore it and laugh at it. I'm with Luigifan on this one. You must be Zero-Tolerance and you must show it! You must fight aggression with aggression. If you don't come down hard enough on them anarchy will soon take over. MightyKombat 14:46, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Uh, thanks? --Luigifan 22:03, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't mention it. Either way, they tell us "Be civil to vandals" but are vandals civil? There's a point admins are ADAMANT on ignoring. Sometimes I wonder whether to continue fighitng vandalism incase I do something that "hurts the precious vandals' feelings" MightyKombat 15:41, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Well I'm pretty busy and only on wiki now and again to relieve stress, but it's always good to see someone else trying to clean up vandalism.D1Puck1T 03:52, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AFD for MarioWeen

I'm not blind, man. BlazeHedgehog 00:23, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dude, it's 17 keep to 11 delete (and a couple of those deletes are "weak deletes", at that, which means it's probably more like... 17 keep to 10 delete.). It's kind of close, but I'm not really sweating bullets or anything. BlazeHedgehog 13:21, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Please refrain from vandalising the user pages of other users, or making changes which the user indicates are unhelpful. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Andre (talk) 01:25, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I hated to do it, but me, Blaze, and several others were all clamoring for you to come to your senses. Unfortunately, you did not. --Luigifan 01:27, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism is not a "wake-up call." Additionally, please direct correspondence to my talk page or the AFD itself, not my user page. Andre (talk) 01:41, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think you understand how our deletion policy works. I do not have to respond specifically to all criticisms, nor am I able to de-list an AFD if I am convinced that it was a bad idea (which I am not). "Getting my attention" was not necessary, and vandalism is certainly not the proper route to do so. If you are going to do anything rash, it will only get you blocked. I suggest you listen to your friend BlazeHedgehog and allow the AFD to take its course. Andre (talk) 02:03, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop editing my user page. Use the talk page. Andre (talk) 02:07, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
What's that going to accomplish? You refuse to listen to him. If you're a bigot, I have to burst your bubble, because I have little tolerance for sin. As for the eruption on the AFD, yes, that was purely my fault. I let myself get riled up and explode, and it just made me look like a barbarian. >_< But deafening yourself to the opinion of others is inexcusable. If you continue to give Blaze a hard time, you are going to regret it. --Luigifan 02:11, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I do not believe the page is notable. I believe many fangames are similarly non-notable. I do not see how this makes me a bigot. Andre (talk) 02:18, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
If this isn't notable, I have no clue what is. This is one of the most popular fangames in existence, on par with, if not better than, Estel's When Tails Gets Bored. If you believe that Marioween isn't notable, then you cannot enjoy fangames. I fail to see how you cannot realize this. --Luigifan 02:22, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Are you for real? Andre (talk) 03:30, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The Ninja of Peace? There's no sockpuppetry going on, it's still the same username. It's more like a voluntary split personality. You should notice that I'm much more calm and introspective as the Ninja of Peace. --Luigifan 11:04, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
That's not what I mean. I mean, are you serious? Are you taking this seriously? Andre (talk) 03:31, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, yes. Quite seriously. The way of the ninja is stealth... He strikes when his foe least expects it... However, as you seem to have dropped out of the discussion, punishing your bigotry would be a moot cause at the moment. Therefore, I have no reason to pursue you. --Luigifan 12:24, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
As an unbiased passerby third-party, I'd say Luigifan is seriously pushing his luck. Dude, you're gonna get blocked. Don't push it. --172.191.91.69 21:09, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
dot...dot...dot...Drahcirmy talkget my skin 01:28, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent behaviour

You've asked me to help out on a deletion discussion. I'm taking a look through it now. However, your behaviour has been absolutely appalling. Others are entitled to their opinions- just because you disagree doesn't mean that you need to give them a "wake up call." You're lucky you haven't been blocked for incivility and personal threats. I recommend you just step aside from the discussion entirely. Also, cut back on the ninja stuff. It's making you look quite ridiculous- combined with your absolute rudeness and arrogance towards others, you're hurting your case more than you're helping it. --Wafulz 17:34, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The "ninja stuff" was my way of realizing that I had been a barbarian, and changing my tune in order to better present my case. Yes, maybe I was a bit arrogant as the Ninja of Peace, but rude? I don't see how. --Luigifan 12:03, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Alrighty

I'm going to be blunt with you: if you continue with your current behavior, you will be blocked. If you wish to contribute the right way, please keep the following in mind:

  • Always be civil. Always. No matter how upset you get, keep a cool head.
  • Do not vandalise other people's pages, especially over content dispute, i.e., someone else's listing of an article on AFD.
  • Wikipedia is not a chat room. Trying to ask how other people which characters they use in Super Smash Brothers is un-encyclopedic and does not belong here.
  • If articles are deleted, you cannot re-create them. I can't stress this enough. Even if you create it again, it will be deleted. Continuing to add it will result in it being salted.
  • Edit wars happen, and using offensive edit summaries will not help.
  • Just because you think a fangame is great doesn't mean it is. If you disagree with Andre on it, fine, but that gives you no right to blatently insult him on your userpage.
  • Your "Ninja of Peace" spiel is getting out of hand, and, quite frankly, is disturbing to those of us who have dealt with vandals in the past. It's being interpreted as threatening because it truly is.

I don't wish to make you angry or upset you in any way, but you've got to understand that Wikipedia has rules. If you keep ignoring them the way you have been, you will be blocked. --172.193.88.79 01:47, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing statements

I've reverted an edit you made to Boss (video games). Please remember to cite sources when you make assertions or generalizations in articles. --Wafulz 00:07, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Vandalism warnings

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to List_of_Super_Smash_Bros._series_NPCs. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Dlong 03:31, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsense?!? --Luigifan 03:33, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Damsels in distress

Sorry to undo all those categories, but like I said, the category is better applied to characters where traditionally getting kidnapped or in trouble is all the character does. I tried to find some characters that fit better and added them.D1Puck1T 02:42, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Changing other peoples' comments

Hi Luigifan

You changed comments from someone else here and made them say things the writer (me) didn't mean them to say.

Why? ➨ ЯEDVERS 08:42, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was simply doing things like fixing spelling or the grammar. --Luigifan 12:07, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As a rule, refrain from editing others' comments without their permission. Though it may appear helpful to correct typing errors, grammar, etc., please do not go out of your way to bring talk pages to publishing standards, since it is not terribly productive and will tend to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. For more details, see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. You also added wikilinks, for instance linking my use of the word "test" with the policy WP:POINT. That was something I certainly didn't mean. Please don't do this again. Thanks ➨ ЯEDVERS 12:37, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Friends

I appreciate the gesture. However, you'd be better off adding me to a messenger list :) Contact dta is on my page.GrandMasterGalvatron 13:37, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Civility in your edit summaries

Please remember to avoid personal attacks and incivility at all times, including edit summaries. This is particularly true of the following edits:

Thanks. --Wafulz 04:59, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to make personal attacks on other people, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Thank you. This is referring to the personally insulting edit summaries you made recently. Timkovski 12:39, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please use the preview button

I would like to thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. However, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thanks again. --Wafulz 14:15, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Eggman

Yo luigifan, just to let you know, "Eggman" is no longer a nickname. It may not be his "real" name, but now it's his "official" name. And it's all supported by these links, which are of all the recent Sonic games: http://www.sega.com/gamesite/sonicnext/sonicnext_full/index.php http://www.sega.com/gamesite/sonicheroes/content.html http://www.sega.com/gamesite/shadow/base.html http://www.sega.com/gamesite/sonicriders/ 65.100.167.180 03:05, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, "Eggman" is still a nickname for the character, even though everybody in the series calls him "Dr. Eggman", including Eggman himself; he's virtually never referred to by his actual name (Dr. Ivo Robotnik) these days. It's very similar to the fact that everybody refers to Miles "Tails" Prower as simply "Tails", including Tails himself. Nobody refers to him by his actual name (e. g. Miles Prower) in the series. So, yes, "Eggman" has become the official name, but it's still technically just a nickname.

Katana

Your recent edit to the Katana article is somewhat questionable, as is its reasoning. The inclusion of the videos into the article does not add any 'encyclopaedic' information. It shows a single unsubstantiated and misconstrued experiment. You may see other information of the talk page of the article. I would ask you to retract that edit, as it has been discussed and ultimately found to be unsuitable, unscientific, uninformative, and unencyclopaedic. - xiliquiernTalk 21:24, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey.

Well, what do you want me to say, exactly? Luigi woke up from a dream, you see. Able Juice is from Mario RPG. BlazeHedgehog 11:27, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding edits made during December 13 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 18:00, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Um, what did I do? --Luigifan 11:57, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
For example, you added the line "(This is mainly because Trudeau's critics are all ignorant/prejudiced LIARS!!!!!)" to the Kevin Trudeau entry. See here [4]. I note that you even labeled the change as, "I know this is going to be reverted, but it needs to be said." So you obviously knew what you were doing was vandalism. If you have something to say, say it articulately on the talk page, not by vandalism. Thank you. -- HiEv 07:34, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah. Apologies for not responding to the question promptly, and thanks HiEv for doing so. It wasn't intentional, I've just got far too many pages on my watchlist. -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 07:44, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Uhm...What?

Hi Lui! I noticed that you've added a comment on H Hog's talk page where I've described him my problems. Well, my English is not very well and so I hardly understodd what you were talking about. Well, do you know where I can play Alex Kidd in Miracle World online over Java? Morris Munroe 16:48, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but I can't help you there. --Luigifan 12:09, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Need some help

Check out this debate in Rouge's talk page. This dude is actually trying to say that Sonic Channel isn't a reliable source, even though it's directly from Sonic Team. He's also insisting that Rouge should be mentioned as 17/18 even though that's a direct contradiction to Sonic Team's data. Can I get a little assistance here?GrandMasterGalvatron 15:12, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is this the same one where I made that Fire Emblem gag? --Luigifan 12:14, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yep. It's the one where I made the Fire Emblem gag. (Specifically, I asked what in the world Fire Emblem had to do with Rouge's age.) --Luigifan 12:17, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't abuse talk pages

Please don't abuse talk pages by adding nonsense like this. Thank you. Andy Mabbett 12:10, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You might try posting it here instead.[5] Shui9 14:35, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That stuff isn't nonsense, it's a serious concern of mine! And, who said that I was "abusing" talk pages? --Luigifan 23:03, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article talk pages are not supposed to be used for chatting, but for collaborating on articles (WP:NOT, WP:TALK). The reference desk is more suited to asking questions. -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 23:08, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The reference desk is a place to ask questions to the users of Wikipedia. Your questions there will not be removed.Shui9 12:37, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm, perhaps we should have reference desks for specific topics? For example, say, Wikipedia:Reference desk/Sonic the Hedgehog series, or Wikipedia:Reference desk/Star Wars series? I think it might be a good idea... --Luigifan 14:15, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please be reminded that talk pages exist to discuss the associated article, not the subject of the article. Wikipedia is not a help desk for your personal issues. AecisBrievenbus 12:47, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The point of that was the "talk pages do not equal forums" policy. Since reference desks do equal forums, we could post speculation there without causing any harm. --Luigifan 23:49, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Characters

You are free to chime in on the talk page, but this is already over. Nobody objected with a valid reason. Nemu 12:25, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Uh, what are you talking about? --Luigifan 11:16, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What the heck... Something's wrong with my contributions page!!!!

Just a few minutes ago, my contributions page stopped recording my edits! At the time of this post, it has completely and utterly REFUSED to even acknowledge the fact that I have made nine edits, including this one, in the last fifteen minutes or so. Does anybody have any clue how to get it to record my edits again? (For the record, my watchlist still gets updated whenever I make an edit.) --Luigifan 22:22, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wait, it's just started responding... Still, this fifteen-minute delay is a bit concerning. --Luigifan 22:25, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm, the problem's vanished... that was weird. --Luigifan 11:15, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Where did you hear that Ryan Drummond is voicing Sonic in a cartoon starting this year?

I was looking at the history of the Sonic the Hedgehog (character) article, and I noticed that you added Ryan Drummond to the list of voice actors with a date of (2007 - Present) under the TV Shows section.

Where on earth did you hear about this?

Your bit of info has since been removed by someone else.

I'm calling your edit vandalism. --74.122.176.30 14:04, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I did? Really?!? When exactly did I do that? Hmm, I must have reverted some edit without paying much attention to what the heck I was doing. Oops. I honestly didn't mean to vandalize the page - it must have been some dumb mistake on my part. --Luigifan 14:11, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, okay. You're forgivin! :P --74.122.176.30 14:18, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

your name

Is your name basied on the mario LuigiSonicrules2 13:27, 22 April 2007 (UTC)Sonicrules2[reply]

Yes. Yes, it is. Man, it took this site long enough to figure that one out... --Luigifan 22:30, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Order of the Stick character descriptions

I removed your additions to the OotS characters as "creep" because they're meant to be an essential summary of the character, with a more full description given on the character pages. Right now, they're pretty concise, and if everyone added what they thought was important, we would get a much larger summary (and I'd call the process "creep" - comparable to "feature creep" in software). The other issue is that both additions have issues with verifiability, which is a problem on Wikipedia. --GargoyleMT 14:59, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kirlia Trivia

You were told why the trivia section was removed, yet you continue to add it...why? -Sukecchi 20:25, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wynaut... I mean, why not? --Luigifan 20:27, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Once AGAIN, because of WP:TRIVIA. Now please, stop adding it. -Sukecchi 20:31, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
...I asked you nicely to stop. I explained why the trivia section is not necessary, but you insist on adding it. "Cosmo's article has it". My response: So? Two wrongs don't make a right. Now please, PLEASE stop. -Sukecchi 22:00, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I do agree, but the trivia section could exist, for things that cannot be integrated into the rest of the article. That's why I keep reverting it; how am I supposed to mention the resemblance in the main body of the article? I can't, not without going down side roads and detracting from the article's overall quality. So, the factoid has to remain separate. --Luigifan 23:47, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
As stated by another user who reverted it. A resemblance is an opinion. -Sukecchi 23:53, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe so, but it doesn't take much imagination to see it... --Luigifan 23:57, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Apparently, nobody laughed at my joke... --Luigifan 23:58, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are clearly not a stupid person, so I apologize in advance if this comes across as condescending. It is not my wish to offend.

Resemblances between Kirlia and Cosmo, and between any other fictional characters, are a matter of opinion. As opinion, it is original research, which violates Wikipedia policy, and thus has no place in Wikipedia articles. Your justification that the resemblance is "pretty obvious" or "doesn't take much imagination" to see is tantamount to asking other editors to insert original research into the article. Thus, it is highly inappropriate for you to be repeatedly reinserting the resemblance trivia. Please stop.

Just in case you're not familiar with Wikipedia policy regarding this matter, please see WP:OR and WP:NOT.

As for whether there's any other place to mention the resemblance, in fact there is: Bulbapedia. Wikipedia, however, is unfortunately not an appropriate place to include such information. Bhamv 12:55, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've started a discussion topic at Talk:Kirlia in an effort to stop the edit warring. Please, let's all refrain from editing the articles until we come to a conclusion there. Bhamv 11:51, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kevin Trudeau article

I have again removed the commentary you added into the Kevin Trudeau article. I've read the book and even have it saved as a PDF file. You addition is nothing more than your own opinion and boils down to personal commentary. If you review the history you'll also find other editors have removed it again and again. If you wish to discuss its inclusion into the article you may do so in the discussion section so long as you can adequately provide reason for it. Given your past vandalism to the article I would consider taking my advice. TheDevilYouKnow 20:28, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. I thought you were another one of those users who had been hired/brainwashed by the pharmaceutical industry to vandalize this article -- hey, I wouldn't put it past them to try a scheme like that, in order to discredit Trudeau's ideas! Anyway, I didn't realize that you had actually read the book! As for me, well, it's been a long time since I last read it, so my memory may be a bit rusty... but I do believe in Kevin Trudeau's cause, and will fight hard to stand up for him whenever possible! --Luigifan 20:53, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Believe what you wish. However, anyone in their right mind with a little study and research could tell that Trudeau (and his sources) are completely full of it. Read through some analysis of his infomercials sometime. Very enlightening and you can't help but chuckle at his utter ignorance. TheDevilYouKnow 01:53, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You mean the ones written by paid servants of the pharmaceutical industry, who want to debunk Kevin Trudeau because they know that he is telling the truth, and that the truth could destroy them? Your username suits you well -- it's evident that you've fallen hook, line, and sinker for the pharmaceutical industry's brainwashing campaigns!!!! --Luigifan 02:11, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No I'm talking about things that any simple-minded D average high school biology student (like my neighbor's kid) would know is utter nonsense. In first Natural Cures infomercial (A Closer Look) he stated that not having enough acid in your stomach would cause undigested food to produce gas and that's what causes heartburn. Oh and a single antacid tablet gets rid of ALL the acid so your brain tells your stomach to produce more acid. A quick trip to his website revealed an entirely different cause. Stomach acid irritating the lining of the esophagus. Vitamin E vs Herparin? He claims in his infomercial that his book reveals the secret ingredients in food not listed on the packaging. What you actually get is his (not really it's actually quite OOOOOOOLD) conspiracy that lobbyists have convinced TPTB to allow them to be listed as Natural and Artificial flavors (despite no evidence what-so-ever)!?! TheDevilYouKnow 22:59, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Exactly, what any simple-minded D average high school biology student could easily be deluded into believing to be utter nonsense. And there is evidence, it's just hidden from the public by the pharmaceutical industry's allies in the government. Do you really think they'd allow the truth to be found out so easily? The truth would destroy them, to the benefeit of the entire world -- which is why God is on Kevin Trudeau's side. If you doubt that, just look at what he used to be, what he is now, and his great success at spreading the word on his natural cures -- do you really think that's possible without divine assistance? God is using Kevin Truedeau to destroy the Anti-Christ, and it just so happens that that the Anti-Christ is Corporate America!!! Apparently, the lies of the pharmaceutical industry have dug their way into the deepest parts of your mind. --Luigifan 23:13, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Was that sarcasm? -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 23:34, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No, I was being perfectly honest with my opinions. Kevin Trudeau will defeat the pharmaceutical industry; nature will emerge triumphant over science, and God will emerge triumphant over sin, and all mankind will rejoice at the eradication of disease, which has been delayed for so long. --Luigifan 23:41, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fox hunting

The reason your edit has been reverted is that predators you listed are not found in the UK which is where the arguments (and most of that article) are based. Man with two legs 21:03, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't realize that, but I was actually referring to some pro-fox-hunting vandalism. --Luigifan 22:36, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
That's Wikipedia! Man with two legs 06:35, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
There are no wild wolves in the UK although there is talk of reintroducing them. And foxes are everywhere; even in London there are about 10,000 of them. In practice huge numbers are culled as a form of pest control but hunting it is a highly politcal issue for reasons that don't make a lot of sense. Man with two legs 06:46, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seven virtues article

Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for experimenting with the page Seven virtues, and for reverting your edits. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. In the future, please do not experiment on article pages; instead, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Anna512 (talk • contribs) 15:48, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That wasn't actually an "experiment". I was simply bumping the page up to the top of my watchlist. --Luigifan 15:51, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Troll in Talk:Fan fiction?

The item which I removed and you restored contains a mixture of cryptic neologisms ("pseudo-literature"? "sub-literature"?) and non-sequiturs (what on earth does savoir-faire have to do with the topic?). As a result, I concluded the anonymous author was looking to pick a fight with indignant fanwriters and fanfic readers. Thus, I feel it qualified as a troll, and should be removed. Why do you differ? --Orange Mike 18:22, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just because not everybody knows what "pseudo", "sub", or "savoir-faire" mean doesn't mean that it's wrong to include them, although they certainly ought to be explained (for example, how is the average layperson supposed to figure out that "psuedo" means "false"?) The guy did bother to write his comment with good grammar and manners (aside for a few words that would be more appropriate in a MENSA discussion), so I think he was honestly trying to voice an opinion, not to start a flamewar. Usually, people who want to cause trouble act like noobs on purpose, but this guy showed himself to be above that level. --Luigifan 23:53, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

BlazeHedgehog

There are a couple ways to get ahold of him besides using his talk page. The first method is Special:Emailuser/BlazeHedgehog. If Blaze has his email in his profile, this should work. Failing that, you can contact him through edit summaries that he's likely to read (such as those reverting his edits). This isn't likely to work because Blaze has only made 11 edits in the last 6 months. Failing that, just give up. Blaze knows how to use his user talk page. If doesn't reply to new messages, but continues editing then he's ignoring it.

Now, regardless, your comment on the Sonic'06 talk page is in violation of the WP:TALK guidelines. –Gunslinger47 00:00, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

friend

I am yuour friend right — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sonicrules3 (talk • contribs)

Wha... No, I believe not... I don't like associating with noobs. --Luigifan 01:57, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I knew it

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Luigifan&oldid=142437668"