Jump to content

User talk:Dwilso

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Hiddenyouth (talk | contribs) at 23:51, 4 April 2008 (pixelh8 article update). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Hello, and Welcome to Dwilso's talk page.


Abbreviating state election data

Hi, Dwilso, and welcome to Wikipedia.

I notice that you have recently been deleting some of the data from various states' pages: Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, and perhaps others. You give several reasons: "I can't read the last paragraph because the presidential results interupt it. So I cut it short. 1980 - Present", "1980- 2004 is a more current trend", "Deleted election results in 1960's decided to move to current trends."

Please stop doing that.

All evidence is that this is valid and correctly sourced information, which is highly appropriate for an encylopedia. Certainly many people are interested in such material.

Kobe Bryant

How important a part of his life story is that now?--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 02:14, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 08:54, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ford and Jaguar

First, Ford is selling both Jaguar and Land Rover, but you only mentioned Jag. Second, the article you referenced only talks about why they SHOUDL sell them, not that they have. In reality they have NOT sold either one yet, e.g.: http://www.autoweek.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080307/FREE/552207794/1023/rss01&rssfeed=rss01 When the time comes I hope you'll use the right reference and remove Land Rover as well as Jaguar. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Davert (talk • contribs) 18:19, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Really, I think either Ford or Tata WILL tell us. Right now Tata has just announced that they won't buy anything until they get price guarantees on needed parts from Ford. Very smart of them not to be too trusting! Davert (talk) 13:17, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

edits

List of countries by the number of billionaires

Hi, with reference to your recent edit on the mentioned page, I would like to seek a clarification as to why my edit was reverted. I'm quite sure the information currently on the page is inaccurate. For example, India I'm sure has only 53 billionaires. I don't know how the figure of 74 was arrived at. Moreover even if you tabulate all the figures, they don't make up the total of 198 as shown on the table. I hope you can do a fact check and get back to me. Have a nice day!  S3000  ☎ 18:32, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Those numbers were also mentioned on BBC news, I saw it some time ago! It said India features 13 new billionaires in the forbes list, in addition to the 40 last year. I'm very sure that India has only 53 billionaires. Anyway, before I go ahead editing, could you please furnish me with a source showing those figures are correct? Of course it has to be referenced from Forbes as the list is based on Forbes. I'm not too sure about American billionaire figures, but I'm quite sure about Asian ones. Thanks.  S3000  ☎ 10:45, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Actually it is clearly stated in the article you sent as what I mentioned earlier. India has only 53 billionaires. Thats what Forbes reported too! This source you sent me says: Asians accounted for 211 people on the list, up from 160 last year, with India counting 53, up from 36 in 2007, and China, which had just 20 billionaires last year, now boasting 42. And China too has only 42, not 48 as stated in the article! Moreover, I don't quite get your argument on the currency aspect. Firstly it is already stated in the article page that The following is a list of known U.S. dollar billionaires in 2008 as of March 2008. Secondly, we have to compare all the billionaires globally to a single standard. For example, does it mean an Indonesian would be a billionaire (to global standards) with just 1.0 billion Rupiah (which is around US$110,000)? Perhaps the most you could buy in Indonesia with that is a new BMW 5 Series. My point is we have to have a fair basis of comparison, using just 1 type of currency. Only then will there be a basis of comparison. Thanks.  S3000  ☎ 12:19, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Could I revert those edits back to the previous version? Are you cleared of your doubts now?  S3000  ☎ 14:06, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lolz, was that said with sarcasm or something? How am I to get a list of millionaires? There would be millions worldwide!  S3000  ☎ 09:47, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Protection Template

I noticed you placed {{pp-semi-protected|small=yes}} onto Globalization. Placing that template on a page does not protect the article at all. The only way to protect an article is to have admin privileges. If you feel an article needs to be protected because of vandalism please report the page to Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. I removed the template you added. Jons63 (talk) 12:43, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rewriting history

You will quickly get a Wikipedia-wide reputation for complete lack of credibility -- a reputation just ahead of that of a vandal -- if you alter the comments of other users on your talk page, as you have been doing consistently including several earlier today. Just a word in your ear. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.164.118.95 (talk) 18:29, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are incorrect, I am free to edit my "talk page", as I want, please read the WP:TALK policy, and make sure you read the 8th bullet point from the bottom. Thank you Dwilso (talk) 00:48, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Guess again, Sunshine. Edits like this and this affirmatively change the meaning of someone else's comments, and aren't looked on favorably under any interpretation of the policy. But hey, you know what? It's up to you. I quit editing at this place a couple of years ago in part because of just such folks as you. Just one more debit to the credibility account of Wikipedia editors at large. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.245.84.187 (talk) 05:14, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
My apoligies, I will be reverting my edits back again.!! ok. Dwilso talk 06:00, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

Thanks for the barnstar :) WhisperToMe (talk) 05:32, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks as well also. Wasted Time R (talk) 12:49, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstars

I was just wondering how many Barnstars you are going to give yourself? It is very bad form to make it appear with your edits that someone else said something. I wonder what User:Jamesontai, User:Husond and User:Moeron would think if they came to your userpage and saw that it says that they gave you barnstars but that edits adding them to your userpage was made by User:Dwilso.

  • Would you like it if someone started adding things that had your signature after it that you did not say?

It is also hard to believe that your user page has been vandalised 46 times since every edit so far to your user page has been made by User:Dwilso along with most of the edits to your talk page. You are working towards losing a lot of credibility here. (I notice someone else also left a message about you doing things that will hurt your credibility on here) You are free to do what you want, but this is just a friendly notice of how your edits might be interpreted. 68.163.57.108 (talk) 01:30, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand why your hostile toward me, let us establish Peace and harmony together!! and remember that I mean you no "harm" whatsoever. thank you! Dwilso (talk) 05:25, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I apologize if I have came across as hostile. I was just trying to explain how your edits might be perceived by others. Once someone loses credibility on wikipedia is very hard to gain it back. Your initial efforts here on this page and on your user page could hurt your credibility if noticed by the wider community. Even though I assume good faith and believe your edits were not with malicious intent, others might not agree with me. I came to this page to see who I was working with on the List of Japanese Cars and noticed the things I pointed out. Again I apologize if I came across as hostile, it was not my intent. 71.242.86.2 (talk) 13:30, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of German Cars

A tag has been placed on German Cars requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Xdenizen (talk) 06:58, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of British cars

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Acroterion (talk) 19:49, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of British Cars

I have nominated British Cars, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/British Cars. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Paste (talk) 20:10, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wild Cities

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Wild Cities, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Wild Cities. Gr1st (talk) 22:45, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:WHITEHALL.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 12:48, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:WHITEHALL.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:WHITEHALL.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:23, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Top Ten mutual funds

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Top Ten mutual funds, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 21:00, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

General Motors Dispute

Hello, I have changed the GM page numerous times and had the sources to back it up from the NYT, Wall Street Journal, Wards, GM and Toyota and several others that will show that GM was in fact the largest automaker by sales in 2007. This idiot continually deletes my posting and puts in a source that only talks about a single quarter of last year when toyota briefely passed GM. But that was changed at the years end. So I dont know how you wish to proceed. Please Advise either on here or send a message to mmadmax1984@aol.com

Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.236.228.115 (talk) 00:21, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct, It is the largest automaker, I apoligize, for the reverts I have made, Thanks . Dwilso 02:21, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Top Ten mutual funds

An editor has nominated Top Ten mutual funds, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Top Ten mutual funds and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 11:59, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nominating articles for deletion

I notice that you've stuck AfD tags at the top of of a few pages (such as Serie B 1965-66). If you wish to nominate an article for deletion, however, you also have to create a space for discussion and update the AfD log. If you absolutely believe these articles should be deleted, then you need follow the full three-step process outlined at how to list pages for deletion. And thanks for the rather undeserved barnstar, by the way. Best, Gr1st (talk) 13:18, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AFDs

You added AFD tags to two articles I created (Health in Kyrgyzstan and Health in Jordan), but did not create the necessary AFD pages. Do you mean to complete these nominations? If so please do so ASAP so that I and others can weigh in. I do not think that these nominations will succeed, as these are notable topics (see Category:Health by country) and the articles are sourced. I think you may be better off if you just remove the tags from the articles. Mangostar (talk) 15:32, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. you may want to read Wikipedia:Deletion policy. Mangostar (talk) 15:34, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Misleading edit summaries

Misleading edit summaries such as the one here is simply unacceptable, and goes against the principles of the project. Please do not repeat this behavior. Additionally, forced image sizes do not conform to WP:Images. --David Shankbone 13:02, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have no Idea what your talking about sir, Let us discuss this on the talk page. Thanks. Dwilso 13:11, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Too POV

I'm not saying you're wrong, but honestly I don't understand how what I am putting in isnt neutral. I am simply stating facts.--Lucky Mitch (talk) 05:53, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Creation of lists

Hi again. I notice that many of the articles you create are lists of various kinds. For the second time in a few days, however, you have essentially created a page which already exists elsewhere on Wikipedia (first it was Fastest Growing Economies when List of countries by GDP (real) growth rate already existed, then it was Debt Countries when we already had List of countries by external debt). If you intend to create any more articles, can you please take a few minutes to check whether Wikipedia already has a similar page - for something as important as GDP growth or national debt, the chances are an article will already have been created. One more thing - can you try and ensure that future articles have an appropriate name? "Debt Countries", for example, doesn't really make much sense. Wikipedia:Naming conventions might be able to help you out with the titling of new pages in future. Regards, Gr1st (talk) 12:14, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Chionites

Hello Mate, Just thought I should let you know that it is not very good practice to undo contributions under the comment "added comma". ATB 82.6.29.26 (talk) 04:34, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature

Hey there Dwilso, thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. You may not know this, but it is actually discouraged to have a signature that is larger than the default text size. Currently, you signature is using "font size 5". The problem with using a large font, (besides drawing unnecessary attention to yourself), is of a technical matter, in that it breaks up the line spacing on some computers, making for sloppy copy. Please adjust your signature, per relevant guidelines, in your preference tab to make it the default size, by removing the font size parameter. Using a different color, etc, is okay. Thanks, happy editing, Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 17:33, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pixelh8

I have noticed you have nominated the Pixelh8 article for deletion, the article has been edited and now contains links to both his CNN intervie and his BBC as well as links so several other UK and International Magazine articles about Pixelh8. It also contains a link to Nerdapalooza and Huw Stephens BBC Radio 1 DJ who play Pixelh8's Music. We hope you will have a look?

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dwilso&oldid=203409852"