User talk:Baa

Committed identity: 1497dc4c8d6cef64dc3b3d9c493c22762d46fadb2fdcbfc6a967c08f8a3386bc9ed024a8e7b4f6679109b6a3594487c67661a15004f158eb8137dd7b42f539ad

is a SHA-512 commitment to this user's real-life identity.

Archives

Index

Pre-May 2008 manual archives

1 • 2 • 3

Automated monthly archives

2008: J • F • M • A • M • J • J • A • S • O • N • D
2009: J • F • M • A • M • J • J • A • S • O • N • D
2010: J • F • M • A • M • J • J • A • S • O • N • D

This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by .

Ed, Edd n Eddy

Someone put the original run date to present. I would fix it my self, but I cant. I tried to contact Elaich because I thought he had a big deal with the original run, but I dont think my comment got through. Please help. PS, Im not trying to sound like a whiny bastard, but I cant do anythingThe Legend of G (talk) 02:34, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Right, done. --treelo _talk 02:41, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't get this.

Here I am again. What I'm asking this time is: You said that the characters in Iggy Arbuckle have to have a lot of external information given on them. But characters from The Nanny, such as Fran Fine, Maxwell Sheffield, C.C. Babcock, or Brighton Sheffield hardly have any external info given, if any. Yet they still get individual pages. Now, is it that these articles are apt to get redirected eventually? Or is it alright for the Iggy characters to have their pages now? Or is there some other factor which I don't see? Wilhelmina Will (talk) 08:58, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's a good question and I'm not entirely certain why that is. Some shows do have separate principal character articles but they're generally unnecessary as in this case there's very little content there a list couldn't handle. As for Iggy, the other factor as well as the issues that The Nanny characters have is one of justifiability and I could see it easy to delete them for reasons of being characters of no note. --treelo _talk 13:24, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Profesor Utonium.png

Thank you for uploading Image:Profesor Utonium.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 16:10, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Day of Spring!

Just wishing you a wonderful First Day of Spring {{subst:CURRENTYEAR}}! ~~~~

If you live in the Southern Hemisphere and are entering the season of Autumn not Spring then I wish you a happy First Day of Autumn {{subst:CURRENTYEAR}}!
To spread this message to others, add {{subst:First Day Of Spring}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Welcome to VandalProof!

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Treelo! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Ale_Jrb^talk 15:37, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Having trouble with a drive-by tagger

On the page Big Jack Armstrong, User:Rtphokie has insisted on tagging a simple list of stations worked at as {{Prose}}. He is misinterpreting policy, which states that "lists of links" be expanded to prose. This is not a list of links: it is merely the DJ's resume over the years. The article is about the DJ, not the stations. Notable stations have already been addressed inside the article. What would you suggest that I do? -- Elaich ^talk 03:07, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Get rid of the list if all the notable stations have been listed. It reads like a list for the sake of having a list and doesn't add anything of value to the article, Wiki isn't somewhere for every single location of employment on someone's resume, even that of dead people. Not entirely certain why a user of their standing seems to be pushing for this. treelo _talk 13:05, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Got My Eyes Peeled

A sock army wanted to attack your talk page...but no worries, I got my eyes peeled ;). Give me a holler if the ruffians become too much to handle and you need page protection...¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 22:12, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sure thing, figure this'd be something unique but no, this happens every so often. Doubt I'll be needing any page protecting just yet but I'll call if help is required. treelo _talk 22:54, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wtf?

What the hell r u talking about? I didn't edit anything. R u looking for trouble or something? —Preceding unsigned comment added by TK(film) (talk • contribs) 12:57, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes you did, you took an older version of Yngvarr's talkpage just in order to go and tell him you're pissed at him for not allowing your "film" an article for failing to actually establish notability. That was unnecessary so I warned you for it, I'm not looking for trouble but if you bring it to me I will respond in kind. --treelo _talk 15:31, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, what do you think this means?

[1] I was checking around for any more external info I could find for the Iggy Arbuckle show, and I found this link on the google news search-drive. It's not on Teletoon, but do you think it could mean a new season? Wilhelmina Will (talk) 07:15, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe but it could in all probability be all-new in the context of the remainder of the first season if they only played out the first 13 for instance. I'd personally get any info like that from Teletoon themselves than what's occuring for anyone else as it's unlikely that they'd know about a second season before the producers would. --treelo _talk 09:19, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mrs. Warthog

She called herself Geraldine Shannon Warthog in the recent episode of the cartoon. Why did you revert it to Winifred. It's not Winifred. Bokan (talk) 03:07, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Put it down to two things, Winifred as her first name has been there for a long time now so changing it without any citation to prove it seems a bit suspect. If you know it's been said recently then put it back in with a ref, it's no big deal. --treelo _talk 10:42, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cartoon Network

I have started a discussion about the name of this article on Talk:Cartoon Network (US)#Requested move. Your opinion would be appreciated. ... discospinster _talk 21:21, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Seems I jumped the gun there, ignore me for now! --treelo _talk 21:24, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of flags from Television Infoboxes

Please note the discussion at Template talk:Infobox Television#Consensus. An administrator has warned that flags be neither added nor removed from {{Infobox television}} until the discussion on their role within that infobox has been resolved. Dl2000 (talk) 01:38, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My Edit

Hi, this is my first tiime editing. I do not understand how it was not constructive. Especially with the example of the Breed standard and this history of the breed practices. BTCA mentions their breed order change, and BBCI should be listed as well, as it is the historical impetus for the change of breed practices for the BTCA. Is the absence of my putting a summary the reason the edit was reverted? I was unsure of where to put the summary or the reason for the edit. If I do that, will the edit be put back in place? Or is the entire thing whiped out? Just trying to do the right thing.

Treelo, I don't know who you are and why you are able to wipe out my edit. Perhaps you would be so kind to explain fo me so I can learn how to do this right.

thank you DogMommy (talk) 20:18, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I monitor recent changes and must have hit your edit by accident. Please put your information back in and it shouldn't be deleted by me this time! --treelo _talk 20:35, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RUMOR by LG (now LG RUMOR)

Hello, Treelo.
I just wanted to let you know that I declined your speedy deletion tag on LG RUMOR, although I am not an admin. CSD G1 (patent nonsense) is reserved for "unsalvageably incoherent" pages. You may want to read WP:CSD throughly, I know that when I first started out fighting vandals, I made a lot of mistakes with speedy deletion tags, and I don't want you to do the same. Please do not take this note the wrong way, I just wanted to bring this to your attention. Thanks, J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 20:46, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wasn't so much the content but the name which sounded a bit suspect so felt G1 would handle it. I'll give WP:CSD another good lookover and be more vigilant next time, thanks for explaining why it was declined though when I saw it was now a redirect I kinda realised that it was a real product. --treelo _talk 21:33, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

vandalism

I'd like to put a temporary block on 86.142.202.168 as he vandalised the page Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Mutant Melee
you may check the history of the page to see the vandalism
thanks for your concern —Preceding unsigned comment added by Beedox (talk • contribs) 21:08, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The bulk of that vandalism is too old and as nobody actually warned the user I can't take any action. I'm not an admin also so can't do any more than you. If they reappear then remember to warn them! --treelo _talk 21:36, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WTF?

Please don't leave drive-by tags on my talk page. The edit you reverted took a very clumsy wording and clarified it. If you have a problem with that, please improve rather than revert. -- Tom Ketchum 21:44, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Again? Damn, sorry about that. To explain, I'm using WP:HUGGLE to monitor recent changes and sometimes make false positives as I'm just getting used to it. Apologies again. treelo _talk 21:49, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You might want to consider limiting your vandal-reversion to anon-editors until you get the kinks worked out. Good job vandal-fighting though -- sorry if I snapped at you. -- Tom Ketchum 22:06, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

I'm keeping it to IP based edits so far which are blatant vandals right now. I can understand your outrage at being drive-by tagged, will try and keep my wits about me next time. --treelo _talk 22:26, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just happened to see this (using huggle myself) and I wanted to say you'll definitely want to take it easy with Huggle until you get used to it. I would recommend not using "q" (revert and warn) unless you are sure the edit is vandalism. Otherwise, just use "r" (revert). Believe me, everyone I have talked to (and myself, but I didn't talk to me... ¬_¬) who uses huggle has said it takes a while to get the hang of it. Once you do though... wow. is it powerful. Regards. Thingg^⊕^⊗ 22:12, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And I figured VandalProof to be bewildering. After today and the amount of stuff that got thrown my way from all the false positives (and the fact that revert just doesn't have the same edge to it) after less than one hour in all I'm going to try and keep it down to obvious vandalism until I get more decisive or learn when the peak periods are, some of those editors are very quick off the mark. Thanks for the support, will try and get to grips with the power Huggle has, makes you wish for a sandbox almost. --treelo _talk 22:26, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MBK004 is Spamming

MBK004 is now spamming all users for unknown, illegal reasons. If you want me to stop, tell me your name and why you are destroying me. I DO THINK like Reverand Wright, in the sense that America deserves September 11. I am, however an American.