Jump to content

User talk:Cyclonenim

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 220.233.68.236 (talk) at 11:31, 31 May 2008 (erm....). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

On

Please note: If a message is urgent, or personal, it's probably best to email me. However, if you do post a message here, please post it at the bottom of the page, whilst also signing your posts with 4 tildes. If you leave a message here, i'll reply on your page. If possible, please return the courtesy :) Thank you.

Admin Coaching

Hiya. I'm going to have some free space soon, as one of my coachees is going to request adminship (assuming that they are succesful of course!). I'd be happy to mentor you, but I will give some words of advice now. You are some way from a succesful RFA at present. With just over 1,000 edits and about three months of active contributions (I appreciate your account is a lot older) it will be some time. You contributions so far are excellent, but cuurent "RFA Standards" (by which I mean the miniumum that a significant proportion of the community find acceptable) would be 4-5 months tenure, 3,500+ edits and plenty of contribution in the project space (WP:AIV, WP:RFPP, nominating for C:CSD, WP:AFD etc. etc.) I'd also counsel at this stage that you should seek to get your edit summary use to 100%, and wait at least 10-12 weeks before another RFA. I'd also like to advise that being an admin is not something special - please don't edit for the sake of adminship or you will be disapointed!! I hope that helps, and please reply on my talk if you'd like to progress this further. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pedro (talk • contribs) 07:14, 18 April 2008

PE

Hello, Cyclonenim. You have new messages at Stepshep's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hello, Cyclonenim. You have new messages at Stepshep's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

thank spam

Thank you for voting in my RfA, which passed with 194 supporting, 9 opposing, and 4 neutral.
Your kindness and constructive criticism is very much appreciated. I look forward to using the tools you have granted me to aid the project. I would like to give special thanks to Tim Vickers, Anthony and Acalamari for their nominations.
Thank you again, VanTucky

RfA thank you spam

Hi there - thank you for supporting me in my RfA, which passed 69/10/3 yesterday. I will put the tools to good use and hopefully justify the confidence you had in me. Best wishes Fritzpoll (talk) 11:50, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Aww... here, you can have a flower too -- Gurchzilla (talk) 19:23, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Neurology Assessment Categories

Hi. I've deleted the categories that you tagged as G7 deletions. It looks like you missed Category:B-Class Neurology articles and Category:Start-Class Neurology articles, as those were not tagged for deletion; did you need them deleted as well? Thanks, UltraExactZZ Claims ~ Evidence 17:47, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Per your message, all of the "Neurology" cats have been deleted, and all of the "neurology" cats have been retained, untagged, and - in one case - undeleted (whoops). You should be all set. UltraExactZZ Claims ~ Evidence 17:53, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No problem, happy to help. Best, UltraExactZZ Claims ~ Evidence 17:55, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Status

I use Qui. :)  Asenine  19:55, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

WP:BOTREQ

I made wikilinks of the diagnoses at: User:Stepshep/Sandbox, but came up with a few red links. Would you mind looking it over? After that I can tag them if you want, or Rich can do those too. §hep • ¡Talk to me! 20:15, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. It only took about 10 min in Word. I tried to use [1] but it wouldn't work. Glad I could assist. §hep • ¡Talk to me! 20:25, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature

Hello, Cyclonenim. I just wanted to tell you that the link in your signature that leads a/your guestbook/autograph book is not allowed be WP:SIG. It is not allowed because signing others guestbook/autograph book does not help the encyclopedia. I hope you understand. Please reply on my talk page if you feel the urge to do so. Thanks. --RyRy5 (talk) 23:58, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate you doing that. We have recently talked about this at User talk:The SRS and a clarification on my talk page. Try taking a look there. --RyRy5 (talk) 00:08, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

{{NEURO-stub}}

Hi - a stub template, category, or redirect which you created has been nominated for deletion or renaming at Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion. The stub type, which was not proposed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals, does not meet the standard requirements for a stub type, either through being incorrectly named, ambiguously scoped, or through failure to meet standards relating to the current stub hierarchy or likely size, as explained at Wikipedia:Stub. Please feel free to make any comments at WP:SFD regarding this stub type, and in future, please consider proposing new stub types first! Grutness...wha? 02:41, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that - you're right, of course, about neurology and neuroscience, but the latter term is broad enough that it's probable that most neurology stubs could be marked with it without causing too much controversy or loss of ability for editors to locate them (then again, what do I know - my specialist area was perception and psychophysics rather than the CNS itself :). In any case, you'll probably find the talk-page banner far more useful for your project than a stub type anyway. Grutness...wha? 01:46, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WProj Neurology

OK, I can start this off now. Do you want me to auto-assess the articles based on the other assessment(s) the articles may have? A basic description of the process is here. RichardΩ612 Ɣ ɸ 08:27, May 30, 2008 (UTC)

Doing... as requested. 1100+ pages to do. RichardΩ612 Ɣ ɸ 10:19, May 30, 2008 (UTC)
Y Done A little bit of a FUBAR due to old articles still being on the bot's list, but all is well now (i.e. I have rolled back the bot's mistaggings). All articles tagged successfully. RichardΩ612 Ɣ ɸ 10:50, May 30, 2008 (UTC)

My RfA

Other than my reply to Guettara, is there anything specifically you'd like me to address? dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 09:42, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've replied on my talk page. dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 09:54, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

SteveBot

Thanks for looking into the SteveBot problem. It is appreciated when these bots work and improve the consistency of Wikipedia, and a few glitches are well worth paying. Eubulides (talk) 16:16, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Easter

Hi, you just reverted a vandalism revert at Easter ([2]). I've reverted you, but I just want to make sure that was a mistake. If not, feel free to revert me. --Rory096 23:48, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem! :) --Rory096 23:53, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

um, i havent done this b4. but. the plot summary is more than that. it gives all the answers. soz.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Cyclonenim&oldid=216168396"