Jump to content

User talk:58.181.249.244

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 58.181.249.244 (talk) at 08:58, 27 June 2008 (blocked proxy). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The IP address that you are currently using has been blocked because it is believed to be an open or anonymizing proxy, such as a VPN service. To prevent abuse, these proxies may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

If you are using an open proxy or VPN service, you will need to disable it or turn it off in order to edit Wikipedia.

If you believe you are not using an anonymizing proxy, the most likely cause is that another customer using your IP address who was previously assigned this IP address was running an open proxy. You may appeal this block by adding the following text on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is _______. Place any further information here. ~~~~}}. You must fill in the blank with your IP address for this block to be investigated. Your IP address can be determined here. Alternatively, if you wish to keep your IP address private you can use the Unblock Ticket Request System.

More rarely, your network equipment or that of your service provider may be misconfigured or compromised by malicious software (such as a virus). For more information, see the WikiProject on Open Proxies.

Administrators: The IP block exemption user right should only be applied to allow users to edit using an open or anonymizing proxies in exceptional circumstances, and they should usually be directed to the functionaries team via email. If you intend to give the IPBE user right, a CheckUser needs to take a look at the account. This can be requested most easily at SPI Quick Checkuser Requests. Unblocking an IP or IP range with this template is highly discouraged without at least contacting the blocking administrator.

July 2007

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with the page 19 August on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Angel Of Sadness T/C 11:57, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Acetic acid. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. Thank you. Oxymoron83 05:59, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with the page Ward Churchill on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Maxim 16:36, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

August 2007

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with the page Wheel and axle on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. CIreland 05:51, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Wheel and axle, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. CIreland 05:52, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Chiang Mai International School, you will be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Chiang Mai International School was changed by 58.181.249.244 (c) (t) blanking the page on 2007-08-22T02:11:08+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot 06:11, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

September 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Michael Faraday, you will be blocked from editing. TOL 01:57, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Millennium Development Goals, you will be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Millennium Development Goals was changed by 58.181.249.244 (c) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2007-10-01T05:49:30+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot 05:49, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

October 2007

You have been blocked for a period of 31 hours from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Indonesia

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Indonesia. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. Thank you.

When I edited Indonesia? I even do not know the URL of Indonesia.

Banten

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Banten. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. Thank you.

Have replied to your message to me here: User_talk:Caniago#Banten (Caniago 07:10, 3 October 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Please stop

Stop vandalising articles as you did to Soi Cowboy --Merbabu 07:11, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Concerning Jakarta, I had put many references to it as caniago suggested me to do. But, he deleted my references. I do not know what he want or what hidden agenda he has to manipulate Indonesian history.

Ethnic group info

The data which is cited in these articles is from the BPS: its from the year 2000 Indonesian census. Please stop removing it or you will be blocked from editing wikipedia. (Caniago 07:54, 3 October 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Ha ha ha. Frankly speaking, I do not know to where should I respond to your statement; thus I write here. BPS did not have data based on ethnicity in Banten province in 2000 because the Banten province itself was founded in 2004. In Banten provincial government web site also there is no terminology "Bantenese". People inhabite Banten province is Sundanese (including Baduy people), Javanese, and Batawi. Is there any genetic or DNA test to prove who bantenese is?

Jakarta and Banten

Please carefully read: Wikipedia:Three-revert rule. If you continue to try and force your changes to these articles, even though you have been reverted to two separate people, you will be blocked. (Caniago 08:39, 3 October 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Ha ha ha. Frankly speaking, I do not know to where should I respond to your statement; thus I write here. Concerning Banten, BPS did not have data based on ethnicity in Banten province in 2000 because the Banten province itself was founded in 2004. In Banten provincial government web site also there is no terminology "Bantenese". People inhabite Banten province is Sundanese (including Baduy people), Javanese, and Batawi. Is there any genetic or DNA test to prove who bantenese is?

Concerning Jakarta, I had put many references to it as you suggested me to do. But, you deleted my references. I do not know what you want or what hidden agenda you have to manipulate Indonesian history.

Your recent edits

Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 15:19, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I will learn it tomorrow. Thank you.

Latest message

Replied here: User_talk:Caniago#Jakarta (Caniago 17:35, 3 October 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Jakarta

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Jakarta. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. — Indon (reply) — 09:44, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to University of the Nations, you will be blocked from editing. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Shoessss |  Chat  03:11, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Switzerland, you will be blocked from editing. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Shoessss |  Chat  03:12, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to British Airways, you will be blocked from editing. VC 03:14, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ian Smith, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Ian Smith was changed by 58.181.249.244 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2008-04-10T02:02:54+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 02:03, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Chimurenga, without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Tcncv (talk) 01:45, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Chimurenga, you will be blocked from editing. Tcncv (talk) 01:46, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Chimurenga (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 01:47, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Tibet, you will be blocked from editing. Gimme danger (talk) 03:15, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Hi, the recent edit you made to Titanium has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Enigma message 07:09, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2008

Your recent edit to Odyssey (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! (Report bot mistakes here) // VoABot II (talk) 03:17, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Brides of Dracula. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Fogster (talk) 05:27, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to Dil Aashna Hai. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ~**_mustafarox_**~ (talk) 01:36, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Dil Aashna Hai. Faradayplank (talk) 01:58, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Block notification

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

 —  Tivedshambo  (t/c) 03:43, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Jake Needham has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Epbr123 (talk) 11:11, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to The Pizza Company. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: The Pizza Company was changed by 58.181.249.244 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-06-04T01:54:20+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 01:54, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Silage, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Silage was changed by 58.181.249.244 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-06-26T02:23:16+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 02:23, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]