Talk:The Dishwasher: Dead Samurai

Video games Stub‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Stub

This article has been rated as Stub-class on the project's quality scale.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A request for a screenshot has been made to help better illustrate the article. (VG images department)

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Notability

Previously, the notability of this game might have been an issue, but since it won the Dream-Build-Play contest there are numerous articles that talk about the game. This is just a sampling I've seen:

I'm going to add what I can to the article itself, and I'll leave the notability tag up for now, but I think it clearly shows that people in the gaming industry have seen and appreciated this game. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikekearn (talk • contribs) 15:36, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comparisons to other games

It seems 71.175.97.205 added something about the game being similar to Devil May Cry, and I have also seen other people saying it's like Ninja Gaiden, but without sources I removed it due to WP:NOR.--Mike | Contrib 12:25, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

XPlay

How do we reference the review of this game on X Play on the G4TV channel?--MahaPanta (talk) 04:53, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Game Modes

I added the Multiplayer mention to the infobox, as on James Silva's blog (http://skasoftware.wordpress.com/) he mentions that there will be up to 4 player co-op in the story mode for unranked play. I'm not sure if you can or are supposed to add sources to the infobox, however, so I'm going to put this note up for now until I can find more information on what is in the Wikipedia guidelines. --Mike | Contrib 07:04, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I decided to circumvent the problem by adding some stuff to the article, and citing it there. --Mike | Contrib 08:23, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well I added the citation to the infobox after all, once I got a response back. I had to look up how to use the same reference more than once, but it helps the article, so I'm okay with that. --Mike | Contrib 02:13, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]