User talk:Spikebrennan
Philadelphia Project
Hi i have noticed that you have edited several articles on subjects related to the Philadelphia area. Several other users and myself have got together to creak a project to help improve, expand, and create articles concerning the Philadelphia/Delaware Valley region. While our project is still new, we are inviting people to join us to help it get started off on the right foot. You can find the project at Wikipedia:WikiProject Philadelphia, feel free to add your name and drop off an suggestions that you might have. If you have any questions, drop me a line anytime. Thanks. --Boothy443 | trácht ar 04:28, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
Thanks for the note on Richardson Dilworth. I'll check into Wikipedia:WikiProject Philadelphia. This is my first dip into Wikipedia in quite awhile and I don't much know what I'm doing, so I'll have to feel my way. I grew up and lived in the Powelton Village area for many years, where my mother had been quite active in the community. I've also been researching a murder that took place there in 1900 which I've been half-heartedly turning into a novel. In the meantime I've updated a few areas such as MOVE and Frank Rizzo. I was thinking of adding just a bit on Ira Einhorn, but is he really worth it? Dsbd 21:08, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
- Good catch on the Amoroso name...my bad on that one.--Looper5920 15:06, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
- I believe dominant is the right word for this one. If you go to the Links section of their website and see who they distribute to it is safe to consider them tops. If you want to change it maybe "preeminent" might be a better word? My opinion--Looper5920 15:11, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
Main Line category
Like the new category but I would caution against putting entire counties in there. For example, while some of DelCo is considered the main line you would never consider darby and yeadon as Main Line townships. My personal opinion is that it might be better to stick with towns vice counties.--Looper5920 10:57, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
FYI - I put prod on List of words and phrases alleged to be derived from misunderstandings
IMHO it's not really the right kind of material for a wikipedia article - basically being unverifable. Please discuss at the article (and provide sources) if you feel different. Cheers. Megapixie 08:43, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
Beaver
What the dickens is it about Beaver that makes it so popular with the vandals (beside the obvious)? Bridesmill 19:25, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
Yes, I do doubt the veracity of the citations (re. beaver + pope = fish). I'm certain they're genuine, but 'beavers were once considered fish by the Catholic Church' is (I suspect) an urban legend with a substantial spread. In other words, they're fallible.
None of the sources cited were experts on Catholicism or the period in question. The closest it came was a page on Catholic practices (which, if it ever contained anything about beaver counting as fish, doesn't any more) and an article by a Swedish natural scientist (as a Protestant during the Enlightenment, someone with a lot of irreconcilable baggage against and not necessarily the best source on the practices of the Church).
It stinks of an urban legend to me, and I'm of the school that if you can't prove something asserting it is ridiculous, especially if it's fairly ridiculous on its face to begin with. ACK-47 01:05, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
Adding Articles to the WP:AFD
Thank you for taking the time to add an article to the WP:AFD. Please review these steps in order for the community to properly review an article for deletion. I formatted your request properly, but you will know for the future. Thanks! --Porqin 17:06, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
Empty articles
Hello,
Please to to avoid adding empty articles to Wikipedia, as they provide no meaningful content. 13:39, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the Compliment
I just wished to thank you for the kind compliment on Talk:Philadelphia, Pennsylvania#Separate Sports article. Please feel free to improve Sports in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania the sports section of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania or any other part of that article. -- danntm T C 01:18, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
Wanamaker organ
Hello--I noticed you were putting the wanamaker organ up as a FAC. Are you really serious about this? I would be thrilled to see it on the front page because I've put alot of work into it, my father being the manager of the Friends of the Wanamaker Organ, but I don't think it's up to par. Do you have any suggestions as to how to proceed in improving it? AdamBiswanger1 19:49, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
- Maybe you are right. I just feel that it's a bit too short and it doesn't have enough references (something I was going to fix with the wealth of books under my father's control). Other than that, though, you are right. It's very good . AdamBiswanger1 22:30, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
Philadelphia vote
I don't understand your "rule is a rule" reasoning for opposing the move. Like Kafziel pointed out earlier, "consensus dictates convention, not the other way around". The only reason New York City and Chicago are listed as exceptions is because editors on their respective pages voted to make them exceptions. To use the fact that this city is not yet explicitly listed as an exception as a reason to oppose making it an exception is nonsensical. --Serge 17:51, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
You wrote, "If what you really want to do is change the general U.S. city naming convention, then I would urge you to resume the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (settlements)/U.S. convention change (August 2006)". Do you not understand what Kafziel means when he writes, "Consensus dictates convention, not the other way around"? The written conventions simply reflect what the conventions are; they do not determine what they are. They are not rules. And that's not where they are changed. They are changed at the individual article level, and then the written reflection of what the conventions are are updated accordingly (like Chicago was added to the exception list after editors decided it would be an exception not on the naming convention page, but on the individual article's page. I think you're not understanding the feedback mechanism that must be in place here. Yes, the convention guidelines provide guidance in those situations where guidance is being sought - the only way conventions could ever change is through the mechanism we're using here, at the article level. Therefore it makes no sense to cite the rule as the reason to oppose a given case being an exception to that rule. You say your concern is a slippery slope leading to a lack of coherent policy. I think you're confusing the process of policy evolution with policy elimination. Please read all the comments and discussion and reconsider your vote, and decide on the individual merits of whether Philadelphia should be an exception or not (and, if not, please specify the reason(s) you believe it specifically should not be an exception). Thanks. --Serge 18:21, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
Good and productive discussion. Thanks. Users like you make Wikipedia work. --Serge 01:18, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
I've had others initially disagree with me on this issue and then some weeks later let me know they've seen the light... You seem objective and rational enough to come around too. We'll see... I'll leave you with this to think about: the main point is we already have a convention that is shared by all Wikipedia articles, including most city articles in other countries - use the most common name unless there is an ambiguity issue (and use the disambiguation convention in those cases, and in those cases only). There is no reason to have an inconsistent guideline that calls for applying a disambiguation format on an article name that has no ambiguity issues, which is easily determined by whether the common name redirects to the article anyway (e.g., Philadelphia -> Philadelphia, Pennsylvania). If there is such a reason, what is it? And why is it not expressed in the discussion section of the voting on Talk:Philadelphia, Pennsylvania? --Serge 01:51, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
L.A. vote
Since you recently voted on the Philadelphia move, I thought you might want to know about a similar vote at Los Angeles. See Talk:Los Angeles, California. --Serge 18:36, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
Possibly unfree Image:Cloud-gate-from-underneath.JPG
Philly meetup
Hi! There will be a Wikipedia Meetup in Philadelphia on 4 November. If you're interested in coming, RSVP by editing Wikipedia:Meetup/Philadelphia 2 to reflect the likelihood of your being able to attend. If you have any questions, feel free to ask CComMack's. Hopefully, we'll all see you (and each other) on the 4th! --evrik 19:35, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
FP Promotion
 |
--Fir0002 04:56, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi Spike,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Abraham Lincoln head on shoulders photo portrait.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on March 4, 2007. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2007-03-04. howcheng {chat} 18:26, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the review
I know you wrote the comments over a month ago, but thanks for your comments on Wikipedia:Picture peer review/Sculpture. They were much apprechiated. --Whats new? 06:43, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
Templates
Thanks for your comments and help with Bryn Mawr. I have made a few templates and can offer some help, but User:VerruckteDan is probably a better person to ask (he made all the PA county nav boxes). One question I have is how do you know what is part of the Main Line and what is not? Better phrased: What is the source you have for what is part of it or not?
One nice thing with the county templates is you know what is already a city / borough / twp / CDP and have the county and census to use as sources (though even there we have the towns in PA question, just Bloomsburg or McCandless too?). Ruhrfisch 02:54, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
 |
Hi Spike,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Tvashtarvideo.gif is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on November 29, 2007. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2007-11-29. howcheng {chat} 17:21, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
Delaware county
Hi, just noticed your request on wikiproject maps. I made this image based on the map of the county. Did I remove the right dotted lines? I could make a series of these for the other townships if you would like. Regards, --Astrokey44 03:55, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
- No problem, I have updated the image and also made a few others. --Astrokey44 16:15, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
- Ive finished the boroughs and townships now. Tell me if there are any problems --Astrokey44 04:42, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
 |
Hi Spike,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:The First Telegraph.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on October 24, 2007. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2007-10-24. howcheng {chat} 17:30, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
TfD nomination of Template:Sports in North American Cities
Template:Sports in North American Cities has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Btw, it's nothing personal, I just don't think the template is very useful. heqs ·:. 09:11, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
 |
Hi Spike,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Tecumseh sherman.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on October 25, 2007. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2007-10-25. howcheng {chat} 17:30, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
Wikimedia Pennsylvania
Hello there!
I'm writing to inform you that we are now forming the first local Wikimedia Chapter in the United States: Wikimedia Pennsylvania. Our goals are to perform outreach and fundraising activities on behalf of the various Wikimedia projects. If you're interested in being a part of the chapter, or just want to know more, you can:
- Contact us on IRC at #wikimedia-pa
- Join our mailing list
- Visit our blog at http://wmfpa.blogspot.com
Thanks and I hope you join up! Cbrown1023 talk 04:32, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
 |
Hi Spike,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Cody-Buffalo-Bill-LOC.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on November 6, 2007. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2007-11-06.
Use of image on Apple's website
Hi there. You invited me to email you regarding the issue I had with Apple. I emailed you on the 3rd of July and did not hear back from you. Did you get the email? Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 22:26, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- I emailed the same address last time but I have just now forwarded the original email to you. Can you confirm if you've received it this time? Thanks. Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 22:12, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
- I don't mean to be impatient but I have emailed you twice now over the last two weeks and have not heard back. Can you confirm you received my email on the 11th of July? Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 19:43, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- Unless you sent the email in the last 24 hours or so, I don't think I received it (can't check it at the moment though)! Very strange.. could I ask you to resend it and cc diliff@gmail.com? Thanks, and sorry for the trouble. Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 08:36, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
- I don't mean to be impatient but I have emailed you twice now over the last two weeks and have not heard back. Can you confirm you received my email on the 11th of July? Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 19:43, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 |
 |
Hi Spike,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Sitting Bull - edit2.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on November 16, 2007. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2007-11-16. howcheng {chat} 17:02, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading images/media to Wikipedia! There is however another Wikimedia foundation project called Wikimedia Commons, a central media repository for all free media. In the future, please consider creating an account and uploading media there instead. That way, all the other language Wikipedias can use them too, as well as our many sister projects. This will also allow our visitors to search for, view and use our media in one central location. If you wish to move previous uploads to Commons, see Wikipedia:Moving images to the Commons. Please note that non-free content, such as images claimed as fair use, cannot be uploaded to the Wikimedia Commons. Help us spread the word about Commons by informing other users, and please continue uploading!
Sfan00 IMG 20:36, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
 |
Hi Spike,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Buchenwald Slave Laborers Liberation.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on November 21, 2007. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2007-11-21. howcheng {chat} 01:27, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates/delist/Image:Horseanatomy.png
Hi Spike, I was wondering if I could get you to take another look at the delist nomination for Wikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates/delist/Image:Horseanatomy.png based on my comment directly after yours. I Have corrected the problems with the diagram and am slightly upset about the delist nom as the nominator only gave me 36 hours to make corrections, and delisted it despite me telling them I would make the changes today. WikipedianProlific(Talk) 22:23, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
Reynold Club
I've uploaded an edit that attempts to correct some persepective distortion and fringing. Unfortunately, I couldn't fix all of the tilt and I had to stretch the pic (hence the larger resolution), so it is somewhat upsampled. Because of this, I'm not nominating it as an alternative, but if you like it better, feel free to add it, etc. thegreen J Are you green? 21:11, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- Heh... Oh well. thegreen J Are you green? 00:39, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
- I uploaded a new version (same name) that tries to fix some of its predecessor's mistakes. It doesn't look all that much better, but just to let you know... thegreen J Are you green? 03:36, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
Hi Spike,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Hitlermusso2 edit.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on December 6, 2007. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2007-12-06. howcheng {chat} 23:54, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
- FYI, this has been pushed back to December 14 due to concerns about featuring a Hitler image during Hanukkah. howcheng {chat} 18:09, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
 |
Hi Spike,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Mulberry Street NYC c1900 LOC 3g04637u edit.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on December 19, 2007. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2007-12-19. howcheng {chat} 18:08, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Missing image Image:Mulberry Street NYC c1900 LOC 3g04637u.jpg
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Mulberry Street NYC c1900 LOC 3g04637u.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Mulberry Street NYC c1900 LOC 3g04637u.jpg is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Mulberry Street NYC c1900 LOC 3g04637u.jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 12:33, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
 |
Hi Spike,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:John Wilkes Booth wanted poster new.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on December 21, 2007. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2007-12-21. howcheng {chat} 17:54, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Re: Trans-Neptunian Objects
Hey, yes you are right; no consensus essentially. In any case, nominations need at least four or more votes in support, and consensus is usually a two-third majority in support. Hope that helps. -- Chris B • talk 14:14, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
WP Philly
|
You are invited to participate in WikiProject Philadelphia, a project dedicated to developing and improving articles about Philadelphia. We are currently discussing prospects for the project. Your input would be greatly appreciated! You can also add yourself to the list of people to be invited to our next meet-up! |
--evrik (talk) 16:44, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
Philly meetup #5
Please look at Wikipedia:Meetup/Philadelphia 5 and give your input about the next meet-up. Thank you.--evrik (talk) 16:44, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
.jpg) |
Hi Spike,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Frederick Douglass portrait.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on February 1, 2008. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2008-02-01. Just in time to mark the beginning of Black History Month. :) howcheng {chat} 17:44, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi Spike,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Bombers of WW1.ogg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on April 24, 2008. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2008-04-24. howcheng {chat} 22:57, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
Commons image pages
There are two tabs at the top of each commons image page, one that says "en", which links directly to the en image page and there's checkusage which links to http://tools.wikimedia.de/~daniel/WikiSense/CheckUsage.php . MER-C 09:33, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
Various featured picture candidacies
 |
Hi Spike,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Etna eruption seen from the International Space Station.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on February 23, 2008. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2008-02-23. howcheng {chat} 18:11, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
 |
Hi Spike,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Brandenburg Gate Quadriga at Night.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on February 25, 2008. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2008-02-25. howcheng {chat} 22:53, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
 |
Image:Tiled roof in Dubrovnik.jpg
Thank you very much for use my photo Image:Tiled roof in Dubrovnik.jpg in Tile! Keep up good work! Best wishes --Beyond silence 18:03, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
Various featured picture candidacies
 |
Hi Spike,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Arc Triomphe.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on March 6, 2008. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2008-03-06. howcheng {chat} 00:54, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi Spike,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Annie Oakley shooting glass balls, 1894.ogg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on March 7, 2008. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2008-03-07. Note that this will the first time a video is being featured on the Main Page (AFAIK anyway). howcheng {chat} 01:12, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
 |
Hi Spike,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:DTI-sagittal-fibers.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on March 10, 2008. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2008-03-10. howcheng {chat} 01:27, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
Leopard Tortoise FPC
Hi Thanks for your vote and your constructive criticism. I am an amateur and all comments are much welcome. I just wanted to inform you that two users have uploaded edited versions of the image. Would you please see them and perhaps reconsider your vote? Regards, Muhammad Mahdi Karim (talk) 14:49, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
Tortoise FPCC
Hi, Could you please give your opinion on the images here before I nominate for Featured Picture? Thanks, Muhammad Mahdi Karim (talk) 19:45, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
Gibraltar map
I added a new edit to the Gibraltar map. I fixed the spelling in both versions, and the second has been rescaled and the text converted to paths, which should make it render properly. Let me know if this still doesn't work. Jeff Dahl (Talk • contribs) 17:17, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
 |
Hi Spike,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Ireland from space edit.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on March 15, 2008. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2008-03-15. howcheng {chat} 23:48, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Merry Christmas
From Muhammad Mahdi Karim (talk) 10:16, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
If you object to the above message, please remove it, accept my apologies and notify me on my talk page.
 |
Hi Spike,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Theodore Rooseveltnewtry.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on July 1, 2008. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2008-07-01. howcheng {chat} 04:25, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
 |
Hi Spike,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:PalmercarpenterA.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on May 23, 2008. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2008-05-23. howcheng {chat} 16:45, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
Curse of the Billy Goat
I think a specific curse is funnier than merely listing all known curses. It's the same reason Buttered cat paradox is linked to rather than Category:Paradoxes. It might make sense to link to sports-related curses in the summary, however. Feezo (Talk) 05:47, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
 |
Hi Spike,
I've nominated this for delisting at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Image:MESSENGER first photo of unseen side of mercury.jpg to be replaced by a larger version which is also in color. Regards, howcheng {chat} 22:36, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
Govende
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Govende, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Govende. Jfire (talk) 04:14, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Hey, would you be interested in nominating this on Commons too? I like the shot and it has encyclopedic value. And - don't know how to say this exactly - there's an IP over there that's tried to nominate several close-up photos of female genitalia in the last week. As a heterosexual female I'd like a fair share of fun. ;) Cheers, DurovaCharge! 22:23, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Govende
I have nominated Govende, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Govende. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Jfire (talk) 15:58, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
 |
Hi Spike,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:NGC4676.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on June 27, 2008. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2008-06-27. howcheng {chat} 00:12, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
Your Images
|
The Photographer's Barnstar | |
| For nominating |
- True, but you seem to have nominated several images, so you deserve it :) - Milk's Favorite Cookie 21:37, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
FPC Again
Hi, Sorry to bother you once more, but since you took the time to help me choose a candidate for FPC from my tortoise pictures, I would like to request you to please vote for the picture here. Thanks again for your help.
Regards, Muhammad(talk) 17:16, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
Immortal Game
Hi, I just realized that you had taken the Immortal Game image to FPC. I stopped editing with that account and switched to one with my name... I will take a look at the comments and see what I can do to modify the image so that it might pass, however I really don't have any experience with picture editing beyond stringing individual frames together. HansHermans (talk) 05:06, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks!
Beautiful holiday idea you had. Cheers! DurovaCharge! 05:33, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
 |
Hi Spike,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Malcolm X NYWTS 2a.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on July 29, 2008. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2008-07-29. howcheng {chat} 17:39, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
I've re-upped a newer version here: Image:Andrew johnson2.png
let me know what you think. JaakobouChalk Talk 14:00, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
Copyright
Since you're a lawyer, would you mind weighing in on this? Thegreenj 22:33, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
April Fool's Day DYK
|
On 1 April, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article How does one patch KDE2 under FreeBSD?, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Thank you for your part contributing to the successful event! --Royalbroil 13:23, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
- The "Ben Affleck" article appeared in the first April Fool's group. The second and final group is up now. Royalbroil 18:22, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Sultana image
I uploaded a version to Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Sultana (steamboat) that is just below the 1000px threshold if you'd like to comment again. MrPrada (talk) 23:56, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Thank you
Thank you very much for your comment regarding one of my pictures. Though the result is hundred percent oppose, I learned many issues related to photography from your and others comments. Since I am a novice in the filed of photography, I am still in my learning phase and would like to receive tips from you. I hope you won't mind if I request you in future to guide me through your comments regarding my pictures. Cheers. -- Niaz(Talk • Contribs) 14:17, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
 |
Hi Spike,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:KatrinaNewOrleansFlooded edit2.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on August 29, 2008. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2008-08-29. howcheng {chat} 16:46, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
Andrew Johnson
Heyo, I cleaned up the Andrew Johnson image a little while back (uploaded over the previous file) and I was wondering if you'd be interested in renominating for FPC (See [1]). I'm thinking that the image needs smaller previews also, since the full size is a bit overwhelming and the background is a little messy, his face is ultra-clean though. JaakobouChalk Talk 10:12, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
Someone listed your image for deletion on Commons because it "infringes copyrighted sculpture by Claes Oldenburg." You may want to say something on the talk page there. --EvaK (talk) 10:35, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
Hi, whilst going through the Commons deleting images of Cloud Gate as the result of a deletion discussion there, I came across this image that you uploaded. Is it OK with you if I delete this image too, or would you prefer it to go through a deletion request? The reason that the Commons images were deleted is that the copyright of the sculpture belongs to the artist, and unfortunately in the US the freedom of panorama laws do not provide an exemption for sculptures in public places (as is true in other countries). Thanks, —Jeremy (talk) 14:58, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
- OK. Thanks, —Jeremy (talk) 22:48, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
sumo print
How did you know that Image:Somagahana Fuchiemon restored.jpg is Kunisada? Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:44, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
 |
Image:05-04-06 0723.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:05-04-06 0723.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. rootology (C)(T) 17:08, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
Image:05-04-06 0717.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:05-04-06 0717.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. rootology (C)(T) 17:13, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
Image:05-04-06 0721.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:05-04-06 0721.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. rootology (C)(T) 19:22, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
Image:05-04-06 0720.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:05-04-06 0720.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. rootology (C)(T) 19:25, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
Image:05-04-06 0718.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:05-04-06 0718.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. rootology (C)(T) 19:27, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
Image:05-04-06 0722.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:05-04-06 0722.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. rootology (C)(T) 19:31, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
