Jump to content

Talk:Homo floresiensis

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 62.216.120.76 (talk) at 23:51, 12 June 2009 (→‎In its current state...). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Featured articleHomo floresiensis is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on December 24, 2004.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 23, 2004Featured article candidatePromoted
October 23, 2006Featured article reviewKept
March 22, 2009Featured article reviewKept
Current status: Featured article

Template:V0.5

In its current state...

...this article can't be featured. --62.216.120.76 (talk) 18:42, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why not? The article just went through a Featured Article Review three months ago, and the decision was to let it keep its little gold star WP:Featured_article_review/Homo_floresiensis/archive2. Do you have specific comments about why it is not Feature Article worthy? Edhubbard (talk) 23:52, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
There are some problems in the end of the "Discovery" part and there's a lack of images. --62.216.120.76 (talk) 15:26, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This is very good job, though :) --62.216.120.76 (talk) 15:27, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, great. Specific comments, we can work with. Let's work on the problems at the end of the Discovery part. What, specifically, would you like to see added, removed, or clarified? Or, just be bold, and we can come to a consensus together. The lack of images is probably going to be harder to deal with, since of course, to appear here in wikipedia, the images have to be in the public domain, or we have to justify the use of non-free content. When we were doing the FAR, we checked places like Flickr for any available free images. There just aren't that many out there. Edhubbard (talk) 20:02, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Look, I was in hurry when writing that but whatever. After all, it's your problem. You, sir, are just like anyone in the finnish Wikipedia and there they lack manners bad. I declare this conversation over. --62.216.120.76 (talk) 23:51, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]