Jump to content

User talk:Closedmouth

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Mikey-is-lost (talk | contribs) at 14:04, 22 August 2009. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Angel Heartz

Can I please have a copy of the stated page? My sister got on this account and I want to see what she has done. Thanks Eurovision 2009 and 2010Sasha SonSakis Rouvas 16:01, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know which page you're talking about. A link would be nice. --Closedmouth (talk) 15:53, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

To be honest, I would think it would be obvious, thats why it says Angel Heartz at the top. Angel Heartz is the page. Eurovision 2009 and 2010Sasha SonSakis Rouvas 19:15, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Angel Heartz never existed. --Closedmouth (talk) 13:15, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

http://pastebin.com/m43eee9a --Closedmouth (talk) 13:48, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

thanks

thanks for taking care of my pages for me

You're welcome. --Closedmouth (talk) 15:53, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dramaonly

Hi, Closedmouth! You are invited to participate in the Great Wikipedia Dramaonly, an effort to end arguments and discussions, and fight vandalism! It is intended to stop discussions from interfering everyone's work in the article namespace. Please sign up here! Kayau Wuthering Heights VANITY FAIR paradise lost 10:39, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 00:17, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't have anything to do. --Closedmouth (talk) 13:40, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Herald Sun

what relevance does the opinion of john pilger on andrew bolt have to do with the herald sun page? surely it would be more appropriate on andrew bolts page? --121.220.78.249 (talk) 09:46, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I couldn't find anything constructive about this edit. --Closedmouth (talk) 13:39, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Paint It Black

Hi Closdemouth, thanks for trying to fix the mess that User:Das Ansehnlisch caused. However, the page is currently at Paint It Black when the correct title is Paint It, Black. Please can you arrange this move, as it won't let me. --JD554 (talk) 16:33, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I didn't realise there was a comma. --Closedmouth (talk) 07:20, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Roy Gordon Lawrence

[Dodgy content blanked by Calton (talk · contribs)]

As you can see this is not a made up article put based on historical facts.

Shall I send you the front pages of the Ottawa Sun with the pictures and articles as proof?

Help me out here - who do I appeal to to have the page restored - at leats for a couple of weeks so we can fix any problems you say exist. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.229.226.130 (talk) 12:03, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As you've been name-checked there, you may wish to check out both User:Levinstein/Roy Gordon Lawrence and User talk:Levinstein, possibly deleted by the time you read this. --Calton | Talk 13:57, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, this is getting a bit ridiculous. --Closedmouth (talk) 13:58, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

So why are you protecting a notorious predatory pedophile? There are plenty of pages about infamous priests - so why remove the one about the baptist pedophile? It was documented! What is your motive? The page will be put back up I assure you. B.L. Italic text —Preceding unsigned comment added by Levinstein (talk • contribs) 17:40, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 17 August 2009

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 01:33, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Paint, It Black

Please do not move pages to nonsensical titles. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to learn more about moving pages, please see the guidelines on this subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Radiopathy •talk• 05:53, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. --Closedmouth (talk) 08:03, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Need your assistance

Hi. I'd like your assistance with this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/J0-r3L

Thank you. --   GameShowKid – talk – evidence   07:23, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I don't do SPI. --Closedmouth (talk) 08:13, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Finite Well figures

I have reloaded these with - I hope - suitable copyright statements (they are my own work). Annafitzgerald (talk) 13:09, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that looks fine. --Closedmouth (talk) 13:14, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Midget Cum Mustache

I don't understand how you can validate deleting my page on the band "Midget Cum Mustache" because they are insignificant? They have a huge cult following in the Arkansas punk scene and have pretty much started a new sub-genre in the area. I think this is entirely based on one user's opinion on what is important and what isn't. I wasn't through editing their wiki yet. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Roncore.pfts (talk • contribs) 14:41, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, they don't appear to be notable in any sense of the word. --Closedmouth (talk) 13:51, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

UserNewerapestcontrol

Hi. I was wondering if could ask about your block of this user. They didn't appear to have edited yet, so I wasn't sure why you hardblocked them. Thanks! TNXMan 14:08, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ugh, let's just say my reading comprehension is failing me. --Closedmouth (talk) 02:32, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blademaster (Transformers)

Hi Closedmouth! :) Can you explain to me why you disagreed with the proposed deletion of Blademaster (Transformers)? Did you find reliable sources? Regards, Theleftorium 15:02, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The prod was contested here, and was subsequently restored incorrectly. --Closedmouth (talk) 02:36, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I'm sorry, I thought you were the one who contested it first. I'll take it to AfD. :) Theleftorium 14:07, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Autoreviewer status

Thanks for that, I appreciate it. Jrcla2 talk 03:52, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FkpCascais

Many thanx, I feel very flattered by your compliment, but I feel I could do even better. I didn´t wanted to bother you but, can I ask you, what exactly means the autoreviewing right? Best regards. Filip FkpCascais (talk) 04:01, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Great, many, many thanx again! FkpCascais (talk) 04:15, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding this edit

It seems rather strange that you added {{unreferenced}} to the article, since there were two online references provided in the references section. --Paul_012 (talk) 14:20, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, missed those. Should be {{blpsources}} then. --Closedmouth (talk) 14:24, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

autoreviewer

Forgive my ignorance but what's an autoreviewer? Thelmadatter (talk) 20:27, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

List of atheists (science and technology)

Hello Closedmouth. Would you mind unprotecting this article? There is consensus to move this and the other sublists, changing "atheists" in the titles to "nontheists." I believe this might calm the Einstein controversy. If not, maybe reprotection after the move would be in order. Please let me know. Thanks! Nick Graves (talk) 02:47, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's okay, I didn't move-protect it. Also the protection expires today, so...whatever. --Closedmouth (talk) 03:17, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:70.48.196.191

Per past instances of short term blocks (blocks under 1 week in length) being ineffective against preventing repeated vandalism by the individual who vandalizes articles regarding Haim Saban, I am requesting that you extend the block on 70.48.196.191 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) to at least two weeks in length, as this length was previously effective in forcing this long term vandal to change his IP following the two-week long block on 64.228.128.39 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log). Disabling talk page editing will also be effective in preventing further abuse from this IP, as he has clearly shown that he will blank warnings and the talk page with his screed.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 04:28, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]


FUCKER CUNTO I WILL EDIT ALL I LIKE

HAAAAHAAAAHAAAHAAA !!!!

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Closedmouth&oldid=309425828"