User talk:GoodDay

Hello to all fellow Wikipedians. Be assured I'll be as curtious as possible & hope to provide worthy answers to your questions (about wiki edits), I'm looking forward to meeting you. GoodDay 22:40, 17 November 2005 (UTC).

You may be wondering why my archives only start at August 2007. The reason: I didn't archive my pages before that date, I merely deleted them (as I didn't know how to archive). Therefore, if anyone wishes to see material before August 2007? check out this talk-page's 'history'. GoodDay (talk) 19:27, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Ted Kennedy

Not much is being said about the death of Ted Tennedy. It's truly the end of an era now, don't you think?--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 06:17, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

I'm thinking that Joseph P. Kennedy II will run for the seat. In agreement, the Kennedy mystique has passed. GoodDay (talk) 19:46, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

IMO it ended when JFK Jr. went down with his plane. That was a real tragedy as I liked John F. Kennedy Junior and had expected to see him eventually enter the world of politics. He was very handsome and personable.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 05:23, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

IMO, he looked like the Bouvier family. GoodDay (talk) 14:37, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

Absolutely. John Jr. was 100% Jackie, whereas Caroline is 100% JFK. The latter doesn't have her dad's personality, however.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 16:11, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

True, Caroline isn't exactly a great orator. GoodDay (talk) 16:13, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

Uh, no.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 16:14, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

File:Ardents.jpg

Burn, baby, baby burn, Disco Inferno...

I heard that song in a commerical, where King Kong attacks a Disco dance. GoodDay (talk) 19:53, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

Remember that unforgetable scene in Saturday Night Fever with John Travolta strutting down to the dance floor? Ah the tacky, whacky world of the 1970s! Too bad you were too young to appreciate it, GoodDay. Oh, BTW, seeing as you like 1960s music, go over to YouTube and check out The Easybeats singing Friday On My Mind. Fantastic song from a fantastic, legendary decade, the likes of which the world will, sadly, never glimpse again.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 05:33, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

(outdent) I prefer Airplane!'s version of SNF. The 1960's music had alot of Beatles look-a-like groups. GoodDay (talk) 17:20, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

But what an exciting decade. Not only was the music great, but everything was wonderful, fresh, and innovative: films, cars, fashion, furniture, life-style, art, television programmes....I wish I had been older in the 1960s so I could have fully participated in the action that was exploding everywhere.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 05:52, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

One of my fav characters of that decade is Ernest T. Bass. -- GoodDay (talk) 14:05, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

I loved Barnabas Collins as well as Angelique Dupré and Vicky.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 15:59, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

And then there's Star Trek (the original seris). I've watched the Labor Day Star Trek marathon (11 episodes total, remastered). GoodDay (talk) 19:30, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

Don't forget all those wonderful, politically-incorrrect westerns: Gunsmoke, The Virginian, Rifleman, etc. Oh, weren't the 60s just OUTASITE?!!!!--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 13:29, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

"Bonanza". GoodDay (talk) 19:50, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

High Chapparel, The Monroes, Rawhide! "Rollin, rollin, rollin...Rawhide!!!!!"--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 04:29, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Whatever turns you on

GoodDay, there's an interesting discussion on my talk page about lightbulbs. I'd like your opinion on the subject of the EU's absurd proposal to ban them.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 16:00, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

I will stick with my old-fashioned transparent lightbulbs; new frosted bulbs be damned. As they say in the US Navy: "If it ain't broke, don't fix it".--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 05:42, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

I think I'll start something new, oil lamps. GoodDay (talk) 19:04, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Why not use candles? They are so romantic, casting flickering shadows on the walls and bathing one's face in a soft, golden light. I'm having Internet problems due to the storm we had here yesterday. A 12 year-old boy was killed by lightning in Caltanisetta as he was out hunting with his dad.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 06:52, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

Yeah candles are cool (I mean hot). Jeepers, that's quite a tragedy concerning the 12 year-old. GoodDay (talk) 16:17, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

You there?

I happen to be alone in the house this evening, thus nobody is clamouring to use the computer. Where are you lurking, GoodDay? I could do with a bit of your humour at the momemt.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 19:50, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

Howdy, I was away at my cousin's 40th birthday party. Here's a Groucho classic line - "Last night I shot an elephant in my pajamas. How he got into my pajamas, I'll never know". GoodDay (talk) 16:20, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

How vulgar. Or gross as they would say in LA. I'm afraid that isn't my style of humour, GD. Sorry but I prefer satire such as they do on SNL.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 18:51, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

Another Groucho classic: In response to his female waltzing partner's insistants that he get closer: "If I get any closer, I'll be in back of you". PS- I gotta leave for a coupble of hours, I shall return. GoodDay (talk) 18:55, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

Eek a mouse!!!!!!--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 06:41, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Sufferin' Suckatash. GoodDay (talk) 13:25, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Thank You

Ha Ha, thank you for that GoodDay, I had a GoodDay on friday--David (talk) 10:20, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Ravitch

Regarding this edit, I agree with the edit and am not making or requesting any change, because it better represents the situation. However, on a rhetorical point regarding the edit summary - don't you think it remains to be seen?  Frank  |  talk  16:25, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

I thought the situation was settled, that the lieutenant governorship would remain vacant until January 1, 2011. But you're correct, afterall Governor Paterson could chose Ravitch as his running-mate in 2010 & both could win election. GoodDay (talk) 16:28, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

No, I doubt that electoral scenario is realistic. But has the Court of Appeals made its ruling since Friday's hearing? I haven't seen it.  Frank  |  talk  18:11, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

I've not a clue, but it'll likely be against Ravitch. GoodDay (talk) 19:37, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

I'm not sure. Ravitch has a good argument that Sen. Skelos doesn't have standing to bring the challenge in the first place. If that argument is upheld, Cuomo would have to bring an action. -Rrius (talk) 19:53, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

It's time for New York to adopt an amendment to fill such a vacancy. GoodDay (talk) 19:57, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

None of that has anything to do with my original point, which is that whether or not he was ever lt. gov actually remains to be seen. Curious, rhetorical...possibly time-wasting...but I think that's where it actually stands at the moment. We don't know if he was or wasn't or will be or won't be...yet. If they rule the appointment was constitutional, then they will decide as of when. If they rule it wasn't constitutional, then probably he never was lt. gov. History in the making. :-)  Frank  |  talk  01:13, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

My guess is, the Lieutenant Governorship will be ruled 'vacant'. GoodDay (talk) 14:03, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

...or not :-)  Frank  |  talk  20:21, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Is that the final verdict, or does it go to the NY Supreme Court? If the former, does Ravitch's term of office get back-dated? or does he need to be sworn-in (again)? GoodDay (talk) 20:25, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

I would not presume to know if the legal eagles are done, but the New York Court of Appeals is the end of the line for state appeals in NY. The ref says he is now the Lt gov. What happens next...who knows?  Frank  |  talk  20:28, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Why does the story say Court of Appeals is the highest court in NY? It's not. GoodDay (talk) 20:27, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Why do you say that?  Frank  |  talk  20:30, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

I thought the NY Supreme Court was. My blunder. GoodDay (talk) 20:34, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

It is. The Supreme Court includes the Trial Division and the Appellate Division. The Court of Appeals is the court of last result. I'm surprised they went all the way. I thought they'd either say the appointment was invalid or that the senators had no standing. -Rrius (talk) 20:30, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Hmm, I've always thought that all 50 top state courts were called Supreme Courts, oh well, a fella learns something new everday. Well it's official, congratulations Governor Paterson & Lieutenant Governor Ravitch. GoodDay (talk) 20:32, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

A few are exceptions. See Supreme court#United States. -Rrius (talk) 20:42, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

I see. Just curious, is there any legal possibilites for the NY Republicans to take the case to the US Supreme Court? I'm guessing there's not, as the US SC can't make rulings over just 1 state (but can over more then 1 state). GoodDay (talk) 20:45, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

If they could make a case that the ruling is against the US Constitution, yes. My understanding is that would be regardless of the number of states involved; once they make a ruling, it affects all states. However, since the US Constitution leaves powers it doesn't already enumerate to state governments, I think this would be a difficult case to make. And, I'm not an attorney in any way, shape or form.  Frank  |  talk  21:04, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

There's no obvious federal question here. It is a New York court's interpretation of New York's constitution and statutes. -Rrius (talk) 21:16, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Well the NY Democrats won this fight & its appears the Massachusettes Democrats about to win theirs. GoodDay (talk) 22:02, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

I wouldn't be surprised to see the New York law changed, though. I'm not sure New York Democrats really like the decision, either, but they'll take it since it protects them against just one Democrat defecting. Now that they have a Democrat in place as Lt. Gov., why not change it. -Rrius (talk) 22:07, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Indeed, as the same scenerio could a occur under a Republican Governor. It's likely the State Constitution will be eventually amended, to call for Senate approval of future LTG appointments. GoodDay (talk) 22:22, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Especially when Paterson's numbers are so bad and he shows no signs of dropping out. This guy really needs to be made United States Ambassador to the Federated States of Micronesia. I kind of feel sorry for New Yorkers. -Rrius (talk) 23:53, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Alot can happen in 14-months, Paterson might end up being elected. GoodDay (talk) 22:16, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

Sure, but is it worth the effort to anyone but him? Is it good for anyone but Rudy Giuliani if he stays in? -Rrius (talk) 23:00, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

NY Democrats might be solidly behind Paterson by mid-2010. Picture it, a Paterson-Cuomo ticket. GoodDay (talk) 23:03, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

Mass. Senate

It looks like the Mass. Representatives have settled on one of their number, after all. Capuano is the only one still in it. -Rrius (talk) 16:45, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Hmm, I wonder who'll run for the Republican nomination? GoodDay (talk) 18:55, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Layton

Why don't the NDP extract some concessions from the Conservatives and then say, "we are supporting the Tories because a Conservative minority government is better than a Conservative majority government. We believe the result of an election forced by the Liberals would be another Conservative minority or a Conservative majority, making an election either pointless or disastrous." The Liberals are having some fun at the NDP's expense, and the media are painting them as calculating hypocrites. Saying something like that would be striking back at the Libs, and might change the media narrative from "NDP are calculating hypocrites" back to "why now?" Am I missing something, or are the Canadian parties of the left just fond of pain? -Rrius (talk) 17:13, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

I'm not sure as to what the New Democrats are up to. They've no hope of becoming the government or the opposition. I reckon that Layton is still smarting from last January's 'no go' on the coalition idea. GoodDay (talk) 19:01, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Thanks to the BQ, the Conservatives will survive this Friday. GoodDay (talk) 20:54, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

That is a surprise. Depending on when exactly the October Opposition Day is, Harper that could keep Harper alive long enough for another Senate appointment. If it ends up looking like he is going to lose the motion, do you think he'll advise the GG to appoint eight additional senators? -Rrius (talk) 22:26, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

If there's vacancies in the Senate by that time, yep, he'll request further appointments. GoodDay (talk) 15:25, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Currently, the seat count is 52-Liberals, 46-Conservatives, 4-Independants, 2-Progressive Conservatives & 1-Independant Liberal. GoodDay (talk) 15:34, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

I meant using the Section 26 of the Constitution Act to appoint eight supernumerary senators (two from each region). He could appoint four instead, but why not go all the way. -Rrius (talk) 15:43, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Stuffing the Senate to maximum 113? I'd be quite surprised if Harper took that route, although I'd get a chuckle out of it (if only to hear a Liberal uproar). GoodDay (talk) 15:46, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

I guess the problem would be timing. He might be reluctant to do it right before an election, and he might not be able to do it under the caretaker convention after a dissolution. Do you know whether Senate vacancies can be filled during a caretaker period? -Rrius (talk) 16:57, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

I believe he can recommend Senate appointments anytime, as long as he's Prime Minister; though I'm not certain. GoodDay (talk) 17:07, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

I'm sure he has the power, but by convention ministers don't do anything major during an election, right? Speaking of elections and Senate appointments, Layton announced they will prop up Harper for the coming weeks and perhaps through the autumn. -Rrius (talk) 20:48, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Yep, now it's time for the Liberals to kick & scream. As for appointments during election campaigns, yeah it's consider 'bad taste' to do so. GoodDay (talk) 20:49, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Three O'Clock High

I remember having seen that film back in 1988. It was funny. Strange, I had been thinking about that film a few days ago.....--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 18:04, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

Jeepers, Revell sure gave me the cold chills. GoodDay (talk) 18:08, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

He didn't like it when anyone touched him!--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 14:30, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

Apparently, he was a virgin. GoodDay (talk) 14:32, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

I'm not surprised to hear that!!!!!--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 14:36, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

Jumpers, Mitchell certainly attracted the women. GoodDay (talk) 14:38, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

Remember the girl who wanted to bond with him? LOL.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 14:57, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

Wowsers, was I peeved about that; I waited for the sex scenes & then she chickened out. Even Jerry was confused. GoodDay (talk) 15:02, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

It's normal, GoodDay for women to back out in the eleventh hour.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 15:35, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

From a selfish male-PoV, it's cruel. GoodDay (talk) 15:37, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

It's a woman's perogative to change her mind. Females usually back out due to it being the wrong time of the month (ovulation), or more likely to something the guy did or said which turned her off. Such as farting, having a hideous organ, or talking about a sexy ex-girlfriend.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 15:42, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

Jeepers, the ovulation & farting is understandable. GoodDay (talk) 15:49, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

So are the other two things I mentioned.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 15:52, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

I suppose a gal doesn't like a piano in the bed-room (just kidding). As for the ex-stuff? I thought gals luved competition. GoodDay (talk) 15:56, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

If a guy mentions another girl at the crucial moment of impact it indicates that he's thinking of her not the woman he's about to have it off with; therefore it stands to reason that the guy is just using her to get his rocks off and not because he really, truly fancies her. No woman likes to be a substitute for another.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 04:32, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

'Tis true, that's why I'm a 1-gal guy. I just can't devide or pretent my emotions. GoodDay (talk) 15:08, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

Bad things happen to those who fail to draw the line. I also opt for monogamy as it's by far the safest and sanest route to take.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 12:05, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

The potential for VD, is a good motivator for monogamy (not to mention AIDS). GoodDay (talk) 17:44, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

And paternity suits. What goes with a maternity dress? Answer: A paternity suit LOL.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 14:08, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

He he, now that's a knee slapper. GoodDay (talk) 14:09, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

Why thank you, I just made it up.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 14:11, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

Talkpage salts

Note that even if Micks talkpage is protected he is still able to request unblock by emailing an admin to request it. I would much prefer he moderate his language though and have a dialogue with me. I have his page on my watchlist because he made a off color comment at WMC page. I in turn had that in my watchlist as I do several Admin so when a user is out of line I can easily take it to an admin. You seem to be on good terms with him. Try and get him to understand that he only person he is hurting now is himself. If he can moderate his opinions to fit within our guidlines of civility and personal attacks hey glad to have him here. If he can't though it makes it a doubly stressfull environment for others and makes our site look like squabbling little kids. We're all adults we should act like it when we speak here. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 17:23, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

I reckon he feels wronged (by the blocking) and ganged up on. I'm not certain I can change his views on that. You are correct though, in that the colorful language creates a unconfortable enviroment there (for some). I'm not certain he'd like being 'sorta mentored' by myself or anyone. GoodDay (talk) 17:30, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

I'll request he tone down the colorful language though, for the rest of yas. GoodDay (talk) 17:35, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

I would like to help in anyway I can. Please let me know if I can. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 17:37, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

Okie Dokie. GoodDay (talk) 17:40, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

More great 1980s films

GoodDay, do you remember these great 1980s films such as Ferris Beuller's Day Off, Lady Beware, Mona Lisa, and Toxic Avenger?--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 13:39, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

I've only seen FBDO. Giggle giggle, imagine being in Ben Stein's class? "Beuller?, Beuller?, Beuller?...". GoodDay (talk) 13:41, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

I am fairly sure that you'd enjoy the other 3 films. Check them out.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 13:53, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

What spooked me was learning that Leatherface, Norman Bates & Buffalo Bill were all based on a real person. -- GoodDay (talk) 13:59, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Oh, remember King of Comedy? Brilliant that was.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 13:54, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Starring Jerry Lewis? GoodDay (talk) 13:55, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Yes and Robert De Niro.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 13:57, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

They were hilarious. GoodDay (talk) 13:59, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

And so was Sandra Bernhardt. Especially when she did her Tina Turner impersonation on the table.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 14:01, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

I can't remember that. What I remember is De Niro stalking Lewis. GoodDay (talk) 14:03, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

It was while Lewis (Jerry Langford) was being held prisoner and she swept all the dishes onto the floor, jumped up on the table and pretended she was Tina Turner.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 14:10, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Sorta remember. GoodDay (talk) 14:12, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Time for my tea and cinnamon toast. See ya later.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 14:14, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Okie Dokie. GoodDay (talk) 14:15, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Ah....that was lovely. I had a nice cuppa Earl Grey and hot, buttered cinnamon toast.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 14:45, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

(outdent) Earl Grey, hot. Picard's fav. GoodDay (talk) 14:47, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Nothing like a good cup of boiling hot tea. When I lived in Ireland, I'd drink at least 7 cups a day.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 16:44, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

I've often consider coffee & tea as being 'dry water'. GoodDay (talk) 16:49, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaat?--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 18:02, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Honestly, I've no taste for the stuff. GoodDay (talk) 18:08, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

You don't know what you're missing. Oh well to each his own. At least you're probably a hell of a lot more mellow than I am!--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 18:12, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Mellow Yellow? GoodDay (talk) 18:14, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

I'm just mad about saffron....--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 18:16, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Is saffron the spice of life? GoodDay (talk) 18:19, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Poor Donovan. His career couldn't go beyond 1969. Too flower-child for the 70s.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 18:26, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Yep, the flower mood seemed to end with the Manson family crimes. The times were somewhat more synical after that. GoodDay (talk) 19:48, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, the flower-wearing, love-making mood died with the Martin Luther King and Robert Kennedy assassinations in 1968 and was sepulted forever following the Manson murders and Altamont. The period of 1968-1971 is often referred to as the Easy Rider era. The mood was definitely heavier then. Nixon was president, Kent State happened, the Vietnam War showed no signs of ending, Brian Jones, Janis Joplin, Jimi Hendrix, Jim Morrison all died. I remember it well.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 05:01, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

Oh well, the 1970's weren't all bad (All In The Family, M*A*S*H). GoodDay (talk) 20:19, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

I have lots of fond memories of the 1970s, mainly musical as I didn't watch much television then. I remember glam rock-David Bowie, T Rex, Roxy Music, Gary Glitter, The Sweet, etc. And the clothes were fabulous. Check out the red dress I'm wearing in the photo on my talk page. A pity the fashions got so ugly in the middle of the decade.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 06:24, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

(outdent) Creedance Clearwater Revival was my '70's fav. GoodDay (talk) 17:46, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

Red Dress? I'm not sure I've seen that photo. GoodDay (talk) 17:49, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

It's here: User talk: Jeanne boleyn. God, I wish I were that young again. Sweet 16. Although I really don't look so sweet in that photo lol.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 06:52, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

It looks pink & you were & are sweet looking. GoodDay (talk) 13:22, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

That's 1974 photography for you. I've got the dress still and it's definitely red- a bright fire-engine red crepe with silver glitter. There's a Starman waiting in the sky..... Do you want to hear something corny, I used to call my boyfriend Starman back in 1974 and '75!!!--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 14:06, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

Starman? Giggle, giggle. GoodDay (talk) 14:08, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

You can see his photo at the bottom of my user page.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 14:10, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

Is he wearing sunglasses? GoodDay (talk) 14:18, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, I thought he was so cool at the time; one of the coolest in our High School, in fact.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 14:20, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

Any images of the guy ya married? GoodDay (talk) 14:21, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

Jeanne Boleyn in middle, with her 1st husband, who's the dark-haired guy in jeans

|:Yep. My first husband. I really prefer to forget that I have a current husband.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 14:27, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

Is he the father of your children? GoodDay (talk) 14:28, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

Yes my two eldest sons, who live in Dublin. Oh dear, I'm getting dragged into an edit war.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 14:48, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

An edit war? remain calm. GoodDay (talk) 14:50, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

An editor is removing genealogical info from my articles. Do you realise how much time it took me to obtain all of that information. I'm getting really annoyed.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 14:54, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

Ya gotta be careful, he might throw the 'ownership' accusation at ya. Recommend seeking a compromise with him, if possible. GoodDay (talk) 15:13, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

He is a prime example of why so many editors are leaving or spending less time editing. I ain't goin' nowehere, but to say I'm pissed off is putting it mildly. The Alianore de Lovayne article has been classed as within the scope for biography on the talk page.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 02:27, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

That the thing about Wikipedia, there's all kinds of editors with differing views, temperments etc. GoodDay (talk) 15:10, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Stating the obvious

Today I read something hilarious in a genealogy blog. Someone had posted some info about Sybil Corbet, mistress of Henry I of England. She lived from 1077 to 1157. The person thought it was neccessary to add that she was no longer alive. I never would have guessed she was dead.........Would you?--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 15:13, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

If she's still alive, she better put on alot of make-up. GoodDay (talk) 17:47, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

Ok I shall now make a full confession. I am Sybil Corbet!!!! I have been walking the earth for 900 years and honestly, you really don't want to see me without makeup. My naked 900 year old face in all its ancient, medieval glory has become a lethal weapon. This is why my friends often call me Medusa.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 07:04, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

Currently, my brown hair is long & I've a mustache & beard. As a result alot of people in my area are calling me Jesus Christ (how they know what Jesus actually looks like? I don't know). If I'm JC, that make me over 2,000 yrs-old. GoodDay (talk) 13:24, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

He obviously looked like the Wikipedia editor known as GoodDay. Maybe you should tell people you are Jesus. A bit of adoration never hurt anyone, eh?--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 14:01, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

I did suggest to Sarah777, that'd I'd accept the role of a benign absolute administrator. Imagine, an athiest with religious ambitions. GoodDay (talk) 14:04, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

Imagine an athiest Jesus Christ hee hee hee!--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 14:09, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

I've many strange thoughts. GoodDay (talk) 14:15, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

Thank you

GoodDay, I wish to thank you for your support over on the Alianore de Lovayne talk page. It was very gentlemanly of you to offer your support. Thanks again. I really like the fact that although you are a staunch republican and I'm a committed monarchist, we can still have a good working relationship at Wikipedia. Religion and politics (both man-made inventions) should never be allowed to stand in the way of friendship.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 04:01, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

You're always welcomed. 'Tis a pleasure always to collaborate with you, as great minds think alike. GoodDay (talk) 15:12, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Great minds? Who? Where? Jack forbes (talk) 16:15, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

For starters, myself, Jeanne & you. GoodDay (talk) 16:19, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Ah! If your going to include me in the great minds category then of course, I agree with you 100%. Jack forbes (talk) 16:23, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

A fav saying: Those who think they know everything, are only annoying those of us who do. GoodDay (talk) 16:27, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Yep. That's why I pretend to know nothing. Keeps them on their toes. Jack forbes (talk) 16:30, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Giggle, giggle. GoodDay (talk) 16:32, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Just noticed the thread above. Hello, Jesus. Have you got any miracle cures for my flu? Go on, it would only be a minor miracle. Jack forbes (talk) 16:36, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, one must heal thyself. I wanted to be a doctor, but I didn't have the patients. GoodDay (talk) 16:40, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

I wanted to be a patient, but I've got no doctor. Don't they realise I'm suffering? Ah well, I'll drag myself across the floor and get myself another lemsip. I'm not one to feel sorry for myself. "grumble, moan" Jack forbes (talk) 16:48, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

I asked a doctor to help me out & he said 'which way did you come in?' GoodDay (talk) 17:20, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Roads.

Roads are geography. Thanks. Tfz 18:41, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

I don't like pointing fingers but that editor can engage in disruption. She and BW got an editor blocked the other day. Tfz 18:46, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

The British road should be changed to (Great Britain). GoodDay (talk) 18:43, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

That would be a good idea. It might start WW3, not me .) Tfz 18:48, 26 September 2009 (UTC)