Jump to content

User talk:Disneyfreak96

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Disneyfreak96 (talk | contribs) at 00:12, 28 September 2009 (moved User talk:Disneyfreak96/Archive 1 to User talk:Disneyfreak96 over redirect). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Archive
Archive

Archives

[1]

My name is Disneyfreak96


Thriller

The Thriller article is undergoing a copy edit so leave the guy to it to avoid edit conflicts. If you want to do anything lets discuss it at the talk page to leave him more in peace. Realist2 ('Come Speak To Me') 17:36, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You got it! --DizFreak talk Contributions 17:38, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Another issue, not big but still, now that T25 has gone there are no tables anywhere in the article, would a chart position table for the original album be wise or are the prose enough. Realist2 ('Come Speak To Me') 17:48, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think it looks bulky with the chart, but that's JMO.--DizFreak talk Contributions 18:25, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sure no problem, when its sold so many copies world wide chart positions become irrelevant lol. Realist2 ('Come Speak To Me') 18:40, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, i never thought you would support it, i really did take note of your advise all those months ago. OMG, i think i will cry if it becomes FA. Ive worked sooo hard at it. Realist2 ('Come Speak To Me') 19:35, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey someone responded to the Thriller peer review. I resolved their issues swiftly. We still need to decide if we are going to talk about the critical reaction to T25 and whether or not you still feel it necessary to adjust the "Highly published section". Realist2 ('Come Speak To Me') 00:35, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, you voted to support the MJ article going to FA. The article is doing very well, 6 support 2 oppose. However i, and i believe you also, would like to get those who oppose on side. They are requesting additional copy editing which i have started doing. If you could improve the article in any way in this issue, please, please do. Realist2 ('Come Speak To Me') 22:18, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have left comments at the thriller talk page. Cheers. Realist2 ('Come Speak To Me') 12:43, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Responded at talk page, im quick lol. Realist2 ('Come Speak To Me') 20:14, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, ive you want to make final suggestions on the lead, i removed that sentance, then do the copy edit, we are set to go. Its also had a further copy edit from another editer. Realist2 ('Come Speak To Me') 21:15, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I just posted some tips and a review there. I hope my comments help you. --Lenticel (talk) 10:59, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, the first time you posted this it must have gotten lost in my archiving. I have taken what you said seriously. I have added the majority of the links you mentioned on my user page in my "quicklink" section. --DizFreak talk Contributions 00:42, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

He is on the list, and you are very welcome to take him up to FA. Very, very welcome indeed. :)--andreasegde (talk) 10:18, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You could A7 it I suppose, but I can't see it as advertising, blatant or otherwise. --Dweller (talk) 17:29, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism?

Care to comment on why you reverted me as vandalism, when wat I did was clean-up? TRAVELLINGCARIMy storyTell me yours 17:47, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I may have made a mistake. It looked like possible vandalism. This is why you did not get a warning. Will check it out now.DizFreak talk Contributions 18:07, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I'm sure you'll find, as I said, it was not vandalism TRAVELLINGCARIMy storyTell me yours 18:20, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Already have found that to be so. I was just looking to see if the cup of tea template works. Since it is giving me fits, please accept my cup of herbal tea instead for the calming way in which you handled this mistake of mine. DizFreak talk Contributions 18:24, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Cookies!
{{{1}}}


and let's have some cookies to go with our tea :) No worries, it was a first for me -- other than Cluebot reverting one of my first edits. Have a good day TRAVELLINGCARIMy storyTell me yours 18:38, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Disneyfreak96. You have new messages at Toddst1's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

The Beatles Newsletter

Beatles editor, Dendodge, wants to start sending out The Beatles Newsletter again. If you would like to receive it, please leave a message on this page. All the best, --andreasegde (talk) 17:27, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Beatles Day!

Happy Beatles Day! Just a message from the Beatles WikiProject! Have a great day, Disneyfreak96!

...... Densock .. Talk(Dendodge on a public network) 11:41, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Beatles newsletter July 2008

WikiProject The Beatles Newsletter
Issue 013 – July 2008

Beatles News
Project News
  • As you may have seen, the talk page banner changed a bit. It has a couple of bugs (most notably the categorisation problems), but the {{WPBannerMeta}} standardisation was long overdue. Thank you to Dendodge for sorting it.
  • The newsletter's back after a very positive reaction, and thanks are again due to Dendodge.
  • Article adoptions: Heather Mills will be a hot topic next month, as the truth will be referenced.
  • The hottest Project page this month has been The Quarrymen (now a GA). It reveals the most accurate history of their early days, because so many other web pages tell a completely untrue story (one web page said they lost a Carroll Levis competition to a woman who played the spoons :)
Other Project news
Member News
  • New members to the project (since the last issue, which was a long time ago) include a lot of names, which can be found here....
  • Project member news:
Issue of the Month

Apart from the usual vandals, there is an ongoing problem with Wikipedia editors deleting free and fair-use photos because they don't think they are of any value to articles, even though this sometimes leaves articles with no photos at all. These editors do not leave notes on talk pages, so if you see that a photo has vanished, check the talk page and the history log.

From the Editors

It's been a while, but the newsletter's back! After a short discussion on the project talk page, seemingly unanimous consensus to bring it back was reached. This issue, and subsequent ones, will probably be shorter - as we kept running out of things to say before! There's a lot to say this month, purely due to the long absence of a newsletter, but we'll keep it as brief as possible.

In order to get delivery by Denbot sorted, the special delivery interface has been changed slightly - but existing delivery options still stand. Inactive participants who want delivery should place their names on this list.


If you've just joined, add your name to the Participants section of Wikipedia:WikiProject The Beatles. You'll get a mention in the next issue of the Newsletter and get it delivered as desired. Also, please include your own promotions and awards in future issues. Don't be shy!

Lastly, this is your newsletter and you can be involved in the creation of the next issue (Issue 014 – August 2008). Any and all contributions are welcome. Simply let yourself be known to any of the undersigned, or just start editing!

Contributors to this Issue
Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here.

{{../Issue-nav|013}}...... Densock .. Talk(Dendodge on a public network) 12:02, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Are your retired?

I haven't seen you in ages man, are you retired? Please come back. — Realist2 (Speak) 16:47, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]


the The

Yes folks, it’s the The time again. You might like to add your opinion (whatever it may be) on this page.--andreasegde (talk) 15:04, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject The Beatles newsletter issue 16 - November 2008

{{../Issue-nav|016}}

WikiProject The Beatles Newsletter
Issue 016 – November 2008

Beatles News
Project News
  • We now have a barnstar - it can be placed on anybody's talk page using {{subst:Beatles barnstar|Message. ~~~~}}
  • 0 new articles have been listed in the Project Log since 1 October. The project log seems to have been neglected recently, and we request that project members help us to bring it up-to-date.
Member News
Issue of the Month

History of The Beatles has been recreated following the advice given in a peer review of The Beatles. We request your assistance in summarising the History section of The Beatles so they are not just carbon copies of each other.

From the Editor

Please take the time to review some articles (or submit your own) at our internal peer review page. It will help us to improve our articles.


If you've just joined, add your name to the Participants section of Wikipedia:WikiProject The Beatles. You'll get a mention in the next issue of the Newsletter and get it delivered as desired. Also, please include your own promotions and awards in future issues. Don't be shy!

Lastly, this is your newsletter and you can be involved in the creation of the next issue (Issue 017 – December 2008). Any and all contributions are welcome. Simply let yourself be known to any of the undersigned, or just start editing!

Contributors to this Issue
Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here.

{{../Issue-nav|016}} Denbot (talk) 17:37, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Group or band – which one?

We are holding a straw poll (in a very friendly way, of course) to decide if The Beatles should be called a group, or a band. You can add your user signature to one or the other by clicking this link, Group or band – which one?. Thanks.--andreasegde (talk) 23:57, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Hornbook -- a new WP:Law task force for the J.D. curriculum

Hi Disneyfreak96,

I'm asking Wikipedians who are interested in United States legal articles to take a look at WP:Hornbook, the new "JD curriculum task force".

Our mission is to assimilate into Wikipedia all the insights of an American law school education, by reducing hornbooks to footnotes.

  • Over the course of a semester, each subpage will shift its focus to track the unfolding curriculum(s) for classes using that casebook around the country.
  • It will also feature an extensive, hyperlinked "index" or "outline" to that casebook, pointing to pages, headers, or {{anchors}} in Wikipedia (example).
  • Individual law schools can freely adapt our casebook outlines to the idiosyncratic curriculum devised by each individual professor.
  • I'm encouraging law students around the country to create local chapters of the club I'm starting at my own law school, "Student WP:Hornbook Editors". Using WP:Hornbook as our headquarters, we're hoping to create a study group so inclusive that nobody will dare not join.

What you can do now:

1. Add WP:Hornbook to your watchlist, {{User Hornbook}} to your userpage, and ~~~~ to Wikipedia:Hornbook/participants.
2. If you're a law student,
(You don't have to start the club, or even be involved in it; just help direct me to someone who might.)
3. Introduce yourself to me. Law editors on Wikipedia are a scarce commodity. Do knock on my talk page if there's an article you'd like help on.

Regards, Andrew Gradman talk/WP:Hornbook 06:14, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]