Project Matrix

Page types	Commons	en	de	m	b	simple
User pages	Commons	en	de	m	b	simple
User page histories	Commons	en	de	m	b	simple
User talk pages	Commons	en	de	m	b	simple
User talk page histories	Commons	en	de	m	b	simple
Your Preferences ("Number of edits" includes deleted edits)	Commons	en	de	m	b	simple
Your Watchlists	Commons	en	de	m	b	simple
View and Edit Your Watchlists	Commons	en	de	m	b	simple
Contributions	Commons	en	de	m	b	simple
Contributions & Edits (Luxo's Global user contributions tool; includes deleted edits)	all	all	all	all	all	all
Gallery (Duesentrieb's WikiSense Gallery DuesenTool script)	Commons	en	de	m	b	simple
Project Matrices	Commons	en	de	m	b	simple
History of Project Matrices	Commons	en	de	m	b	simple
Edit Project Matrices	Commons	en	de	m	b	simple

Page last updated 14:08, 18 November 2024 (UTC). Purge the cache of this page if it is out of date.


Wikipedia ads	file info – show another – #202

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Committed identity: 727de6b488652594443d85385a2cfd607fa15b739c8b755390d6621c3199b4d42f7c3877ca6746a6dc536836fcf0b8c96620135523fe88af6d6c2e44e87aa21b is a SHA-512 commitment to this user's real-life identity.

Welcome to my user talk page!

Please do all of the following:

Always link to the text, image, or edit you want to discuss. When linking to an image, use a colon. For example, "[[:Image:Example.jpg]]" produces "Image:Example.jpg".
Don't forget to provide a proper Edit Summary for each and every edit, and a proper signature for each and every post to a talk page or notice board. I may revert edits that do not have such features, rather than respond to them.
Reply to interactive messages at the location of the original topic to not scatter talk all around, fracturing the discussion. I do have nearly all pages I have posted to recently on my Watchlist. If I missed a comment, please use {{Talkback}} to drop me a short reminder with a link here.
Respect my babel boxes.
If you're copying files from another project to Wikimedia Commons, be sure to use the CommonsHelper.
If your text or image is lacking source, license, or permission, fix that instead of asking here what is wrong. There should be a message on your talk page explaining things in detail. Apologies for having to be so clear if this message is not related to the matter you would like to address.
Post here if you want to reach me, or reply to a post below via the edit link above that post.

So long, and thanks for all the fish!

This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot III. Any sections older than 7 days are automatically archived to the Monthly Archive for the month of the last timestamp. Sections with less than two timestamps (that have not been replied to) are not archived.

Current Monthly Archive

(redlinked the first week
or more of each month):

2024/November

Past and near future
Monthly Archives:

Maintenance

Other correspondence

DYNASTY OF HASAN PASHA

Why do you change my research? I have been in contact with this family, looking for a long time

had so much work that, is not fair.

sockpuppets

Hey, I can see why you thought I have more than one account, I only use this one because I lost the password when changing computers, so couldnt accsess the other account, User:Novacool. the reason i stated i have worked under varous names was just that a few years ago i had an account and did some small edits. As im planning only to use this account I really cant see whay the problem is, I put a speedy deletion notice on the Novacool account, not sure what to do next, Any help would be greatly received.

cheers

Novacool88 (talk) 1:03 10 September 2009.

Larry Carberry

Hello.

I'm afraid I am a bit of a novice when it comes to wikipedia contributions. I tried to add my sources for my additional info on the career of Larry Carberry. I don't know why they don't show up on the page. Any helpful suggestions?

In any case, my sources are "The PFA Premier & Football League Players' Records 1946 - 1998" (ed.: Barry J. Hugman; publ.: Queen Anne Press) "News of the World and Empire News Football Annual 1962-63" (ed.: Frank Butler & Malcolm Gunn) and "http://www.neilbrown.newcastlefans.com/

Greetings from Oslo! Odd Jenssen.

Reverting changes on SEIU Local 1 Canada's wiki article

Hello Jeff G. Thank you for your emails explaining why you reverted my changes to the SEIU Local 1 Canada wiki article. I work for SEIU in their communications department and a great deal of information that is being posted is inaccurate.

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Basket of Puppies 19:43, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Specific link to thread. Frank | talk 20:09, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you both for your notifications. Is there any penalty for not following "You must notify any user that you discuss. You may use {{subst:ANI-notice}} to do so." in the header of Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents (as transcluded from Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentsHeader)? — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 02:45, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If there is, I'm not aware of it. By the time things get to ANI, tempers are raw already. Personally, I would such a lapse pass in favor of addressing whatever the underlying issue is (or is perceived to be). Dismissing a complaint (or turning around and penalizing someone) for not following that protocol would not serve the project well, in my opinion; it doesn't address the issue. Plus there are plenty of folks who patrol it and clean up by notifying in these cases. Frank | talk 03:48, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikis Take Manhattan

WHAT Wikis Take Manhattan is a scavenger hunt and free content photography contest aimed at illustrating Wikipedia and StreetsWiki articles covering sites and street features in Manhattan and across the five boroughs of New York City.

LAST YEAR'S EVENT

Wikipedia:Wikipedia Takes Manhattan/Fall 2008 (a description of the results, and the uploading party)
Commons:Wikis Take Manhattan (our cool team galleries)
Streetfilms: Wikis Take Manhattan (our awesome video)

WINNINGS? The first prize winning team members will get Eye-Fi Share cards, which automatically upload photos from your camera to your computer and to sites like Flickr. And there will also be cool prizes for other top scorers.

WHEN The hunt will take place Saturday, October 10th from 1:00pm to 6:30pm, followed by prizes and celebration.

WHO All Wikipedians and non-Wikipedians are invited to participate in team of up to three (no special knowledge is required at all, just a digital camera and a love of the city). Bring a friend (or two)!

REGISTER The proper place to register your team is here. It's also perfectly possible to register on the day of when you get there, but it will be slightly easier for us if you register beforehand.

WHERE Participants can begin the hunt from either of two locations: one at Columbia University (at the sundial on college walk) and one at The Open Planning Project's fantastic new event space nestled between Chinatown and SoHo. Everyone will end at The Open Planning Project:

Wikis Take Manhattan page at The Open Planning Project

148 Lafayette Street

between Grand & Howard Streets

FOR UPDATES

Please watchlist Wikipedia:Wikipedia Takes Manhattan. This will have a posting if the event is delayed due to weather or other exigency.

Thanks,

Pharos

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:12, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

206.162.189.235

What do you do for living —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.162.189.235 (talk) 02:49, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your question. I prefer not to answer it at this time. Why do you ask, Pat? — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 13:58, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you have any verifiable information to add from reliable sources about LBJ's alleged involvement in JFK's assassination, please add it to article section Kennedy assassination conspiracy theories#Lyndon_Johnson_conspiracy, not to article Lyndon B. Johnson. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 14:27, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Elisha Harris

If you're wondering what happened, I temporarily deleted the article to remove the edit that you noticed. That particular editor overwrote an existing article, so it wasn't deleted as an attack page. Just reverted and the revisions deleted while I get it oversighted. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:29, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, sorry I didn't have time to look into salvagability. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 07:31, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. =) It's all taken care of. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:34, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009

Thank you for making a report on Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, it appears that the editor you reported may not have engaged in vandalism, or the user was not sufficiently or appropriately warned. Please note there is a difference between vandalism and unhelpful or misguided edits made in good faith. If the user continues to vandalise after a recent final warning, please re-report it. Thank you! Steven Zhang ^{The clock is ticking....} 08:56, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

We've tried, he doesn't listen. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 09:01, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Still isn't really vandalism, is it? The place to go is →that a way. Steven Zhang ^{The clock is ticking....} 09:03, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

IMHO, it's spam, which is vandalism. Hence AIV. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 09:05, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's a conflict of interest, which is not vandalism, and does not belong at AIV. It either belongs at COIN or ANI. Steven Zhang ^{The clock is ticking....} 09:08, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please contribute to the discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard#Devesh_Dabas. Thanks. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 09:27, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AIV

Hi, Jeff. I left a message regarding non-admin declining of an AIV report at Steven's talk page. I'm letting you know since you expressed a concern about it at AIV. Thanks. :) kmccoy (talk) 09:45, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I've been following that discussion and per Crafty's request there I've left a note on your user talk page. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 10:01, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jeff,

I want to apologise if my comments have come across as somewhat abrasive (now I sound like an oven cleaner :) but I am just concerned that a modus operandi is developing among RC patrollers, where new editors who make poor edits, but in good faith, are reverted repeatedly and labelled vandals. It's nothing personal. Just remember that we were all new once, and more often than not are simply unaware of our policies, rather than deliberately breaking them. The cluebat is a tool used to educate, not to beat users into submission. Editor retention is hard, and problematic editors can always be blocked later. We aim to teach first, remind second, and if needed, teach lessons. I hope you understand. Steven Zhang ^{The clock is ticking....} 10:37, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

---

Jeff

The significant other of Robert Peters has created a shrine to Peters on the Peters wikipage. I have known Billy Collins for several years and he doesn't name and hasn't named Peters as an influence. Peters's SO, Paul Trachtenberg, differs, because he thinks Peters was spun of solid gold. Trachtenberg has come up with ONE article about Peters. Although I think it sad that Peters and his boy Trachenterberg feel their only hope is to hitch their wagon on the Collins star, I will work to refute them in the coming days, coming up with numerous citations on who Collins's influence was. (Had it been Peters, why did it take Collins more than twenty years to find his voice and write poetry that was finally publishable?) In the end, Peters is going to look like a benign presence, a failure. But if only Trachtenberg had let it go. I predict that Peters's wikipage will go the way of the spotted horny toad.

!!!

Your message

Could you please check your warning? I've properly cited the addition in a previous edit. The edit you're referring to is merely a correction of the header. Thank you. 99.152.115.143 (talk) 04:22, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The cited addition to Hinsdale Central High School is from a primary source, Hinsdale Central ListServ. Please only use verifiable references from reliable secondary sources. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 04:35, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

But since it is published by an official organization, one would assume that it could be used as a verifiable source? Also, if I find secondary sources, would it be ok to add that content again? 99.152.115.143 (talk) 04:37, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It could be used to verify quotes, but analysis of the changes in strictness between last year and this year should be left to secondary sources, otherwise they are original research. I have withdrawn my warning. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 04:39, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I'll remove the stricter reference. 99.152.115.143 (talk) 04:41, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 04:45, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest? What article would that be referring to? 99.152.115.143 (talk) 04:48, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly the one referenced above - it appears you may oppose the stricter policies, as I would if I were a student there. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 04:51, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of PROD from Christ School (North Carolina)

Hello Jeff G., this is an automated message from SDPatrolBot to inform you the PROD template you added to Christ School (North Carolina) has been removed. It was removed by TerriersFan with the following edit summary '(rm Prod - by long standing convention high schools are notable. I understand the nominator's concerns but the way forward is for him to clean it up and source it and not for deletiom)'. Please consider discussing your concerns with TerriersFan before pursuing deletion further yourself. If you still think the article should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may want to send the article to AfD for community discussion. Thank you, SDPatrolBot (talk) 20:14, 8 October 2009 (UTC) (Learn how to opt out of these messages) 20:14, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war message

About the message you left on my talk page, it is not an edit war, I was attempting to revert the vandalism in the "High Five" section. I am new to wikipedia so I apologize if I did something wrong. Just FYI. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.59.117.98 (talk) 12:56, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notable?

Hi Jeff, Not sure if it was intentional or not hence I didn't re-revert, but is this really notable for the article? Cheers ^Khukri 13:00, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm off to watch the video. I didn't intend to revert you, I thought I was just deleting the CNN ref. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 13:04, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

not a problem at all ;) though someone else has come in and reverted it now. Enjoy is funny. ^Khukri 13:06, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your input is welcome at Talk:LCROSS#High-Five_Incident_and_Controversy. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 13:13, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jeff, stop reversing the score on the Miami Dolphins 2009 Season, they did not score 20 points.

http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/2009092713/2009/REG3/dolphins@chargers

Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.113.11.106 (talk) 06:06, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Manchurian Edits

One almost has to admire this individual's tenacity. Ginsengbomb (talk) 06:05, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps the orange bar is malfunctioning? — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 06:06, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It’s not malfuntioning. He’s just ignoring it. Also, if both of you had been adding warnings to his page, instead of just Jeff, he would have been at {{Uw-vandalism4im}} much earlier, and then he could have been reported to WP:AIV and been blocked. As it is, I see that Huggle (HG) filed a report on your behalf, Jeff, at WP:AIV, so he will soon be blocked. But, you can go to there and add some text showing how egregious his behavior has been and perhaps the blocking admin will hit him with a heavy block. Anyway, I added {{3RR}} to his talk page because he is clearly edit warring. But, he’s doing even worse. He’s reverting your reverts elsewhere too Jeff. Also, since he keeps having the template changed on him, he’s gone and created a new one, {{Manchu History}}, which he is now applying to pages where the other Manchurian templates had been. Take a look at his contribs and you’ll see what I mean. Wow! I have never seen anyone behave like this. You had it right Ginsengbomb: tenacious! — Spike Toronto 06:21, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, Ginsengbomb should have been warning him too. OTOH, he hasn't edited in ten whole minutes! :) — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 06:28, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

His edits have created such a mess on so many articles, that when HG puts them on my screen I don’t know what to do. If I revert, what reason do I choose from the pulldown menus? Sheesh! We may have to rely on the regular editors of these wikiarticles to see the changes in their watchlists and then go and revert themselves. I am at a bit of a loss. However, I had a guy blocked the other day, where the admin then went through the fellow’s contribs and reverted each of his edits, if they had not already been reverted. But, he was an admin and doesn’t have to give a reason that could get him reviewed if it’s not correct, and that chap hadn’t made nearly as many destructive edits as this fellow. <sigh> — Spike Toronto 06:33, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot believe the backlog at WP:AIV! You reported that Altaicmania fellow two hours ago … That’s very unusual. — Spike Toronto 07:30, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

...used to eliminated csd tagged pages. Been a while since I did the tagging, so I guess I'm relearning the ropes :) 71.153.241.132 (talk) 07:43, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Apology accepted, warning removed. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 13:30, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the Welcome to Wikipedia!

That was real nice of you. It's been at least two years since someone welcomed me to Wikipedia. I was actually restoring something that had been deleted, not deleting anything. I put it back into the section where it had been previously, then decided i liked it better in another section. You caught me in the 15 seconds while i was moving the text. So, thanks for the warning, and thanks for being such a diligent preservationist. No offense taken. Cordially, cat 64.142.90.33 (talk) 08:05, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. And thanks for luckymojo. :) — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 15:07, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Help needed

Hi jeff, today all day along there has been vandalising attempts on the following 3 wiki pages,

The users "Barakabless", "Agarbatti", "Vinter-light" have following the same pattern of deleting large chunks of text and references. This leads me to suspect that they are the same person.

I need help to stop these vandalising attempt. Please tell me how can to stop these users from such attempts. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mehrrunissa (talk • contribs) 13:24, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

One of them has also accused you of vandalism. Please discuss the changes on the relevant talk pages Talk:Naxalite, Talk:Communist Party of India (Maoist), and Talk:Salwa Judum. Thanks. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 13:28, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please check this history page of salwa judum, the user Barakabless even deleted the revision done by XLinkBot

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Salwa_Judum&action=history Barakabless (talk | contribs) (20,956 bytes) (Undid revision 319222653 by XLinkBot

Ramapant vandalism is being done on that page. please help. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mehrrunissa (talk • contribs) 13:49, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop reverting and start discussing on the pages I mentioned above. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 14:08, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I done so, please check this page. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Salwa_Judum --Mehrrunissa (talk) 14:14, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done, I added a section there. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 14:15, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jeff : Permission needed to revert

Jeff since now it's clear that the vandalising was done by one user and his sock puppets, i request your permission to add the text and references that were deleted from the "Naxalite" and "Naxalite Maoist Insurgency" "Communist Party of India (Maoist)" wiki pages by barakabless, agarbatti and vinter-light.

Please allow me to revert them back to their original state which had a neutral POV and also these pages need protection from future vandalising attempts. So need your advise on future course of action. . --Mehrrunissa (talk) 04:49, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Theoretical physics and 3RR

The reversions I've made on this page are intended to remove blatant vandalism. The IP 74.225.200.250 is repeatedly adding the name of a fictional character to the list of theoretical physicsists--right above the comment that says "Please don't add fictional characters to this list". I believe the 3RR is not intended to apply to blatant vandalism. NewEnglandYankee (talk) 00:22, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I feel I have to warn both sides in what appears to be an edit war. I would have reverted my warning of you, but you did so already. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 00:26, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem; I can see how it would look that way. NewEnglandYankee (talk) 00:28, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, 74.225.200.250 (talk · contribs) has been blocked. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 00:29, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

celebrity sex tape link sextape.com

I am not sure why this link keeps going away as you can find nice porn site links everywhere on wiki as long as they are relivent. I finally found a site that had them all and wanted to share the site with the public. But if yall feel different oh well not my problemo, I saw them already LOL ;) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ilovesexyvideos (talk • contribs) 00:23, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

operation totalize

hi. this is no vandalism. its exactly the same like in other articles. when u dont know the exact casualties u take the participating units and take the most accurate casualtie figures. this is the method for GERMAN! casualties so it sould be the same for allied. please read the casualties section of "battle of verrieres ridge" . german casualties for this 6 day battle are unknown so we have to list the casualties for the whole normandy campaign . u can go to my talk page and read what cam wrote .... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.192.127.100 (talk) 00:39, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

can u take your warning back please? i did nothing wrong —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.192.127.100 (talk) 00:47, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I can, but I choose not to, as your edit was unsourced. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 01:07, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Henney

Please explain your revert? What is the problem. Did i vandalize something? 97.124.252.13 (talk) 03:12, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A person cannot be a ctor, and I was relying on Alansohn's judgement. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 03:14, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok that was a accidental typo. I fixed that one. Thanks. 97.124.252.13 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 03:20, 12 October 2009 (UTC).[reply]

New message

You accidentally sent that message to me. The edit change was marked as being done by JTRH. Bob.--76.238.4.168 (talk) 03:12, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No accident. "Please continue adding trivia to the article" was not written by Sottolacqua, there is no "seven hundred revert rule", and there was no Wikipedia in 1974. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 03:17, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Jeff G.

Top Links