Jump to content

User talk:Erkman27

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Gazimoff (talk | contribs) at 22:42, 3 November 2009 (→Hack Movies: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The Dark Knight

Eric Rob

Colonel Kill Motherfuckers

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Colonel Kill Motherfuckers, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? BlueAzure (talk) 23:42, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The real issue here is trying to convince you guys (the admins) rather than proving the actual validity of the film. But, I'll give it a go. If you will go to the Hack Movies MySpace, you will notice the writer/director/producer Kevin Strange has been interviewed on numerous shows. Also with a google search, you will see Hack Movies, Kevin Strange, and their numerous productions have been purchased, written about, and distributed internationally including dreadcentral.com, faygoluvers.com, and many other top-rated horror venues. Also, collectively the youtube pages for the director and Hack Movies have been viewed hundreds of thousands of times.Erkman27 (talk) 04:03, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Colonel Kill Motherfuckers

I have nominated Colonel Kill Motherfuckers, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colonel Kill Motherfuckers. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Trusilver 20:44, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Future film

Generally, a film that is not yet in production can not have its own article; see WP:CRYSTAL and WP:FILM. Bearian (talk) 15:09, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

By the way ... Welcome!

Hello, Erkman27, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Bearian (talk) 15:09, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]


The article Dead Shit has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 03:57, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Nicholas Hoult. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. DearPrudence (talk) 18:55, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Joe Hammerstone

I have nominated Joe Hammerstone, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Hammerstone. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Trusilver 01:26, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gameheads1.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Gameheads1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. JaGatalk 07:10, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hey, I've left a reply for you over at DragonFly67's talk page. Thanks, Gazimoff 21:30, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the Films Project

Welcome!

Hey, welcome to WikiProject Films! We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of films, awards, festivals, filmmaking, and film characters. If you haven't already, please add {{User WikiProject Films}} to your user page.

A few features that you might find helpful:

  • Most of our important discussions about the project itself and its related articles take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.

There is a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:

  • Want to jump right into editing? The style guidelines show things you should include.
  • Want to assist in some current backlogs within the project? Visit the Announcements template to see how you can help.
  • Want to know how good our articles are? Our assessment department has rated the quality of every film article in Wikipedia. Check it out!

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask another fellow member, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Collectonian

-- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 22:05, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Hack Movies logo.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ZooFari 04:23, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hack Movies

Hi there again Erkman. Just to let you know, I've seen that you asked a question over at Wikiproject Films, and I've moved it into the right place. Hopefully you'll start getting responses to it. Sorry I didn't see your question - if you need to get hold of me head on over to my talk page and I'll usually reply in a day or so. The other thing is that I've had to remove the article from the main encyclopedia (don't worry, it's still in the sandbox) as it's still got a couple of problems:

  • You need to prove why the company is important. It's not enough for it to exist - it's got to be shown that it's notable for something (like the way it does gore etc.). Most of the stuff you've referenced talks about their latest film rather than the company itself. That makes the film notable, but not really the company. There's a whole bunch of info at Wikipedia:Notability (films) and Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) to help get you started.
  • You also need to use good quality sources. You can find more info on this at Wikipedia:Reliable sources. As a rule, forum pages and fansites don't qualify as reliable sources.

You're getting there, and I'm hoping that the film guys will start helping you out now. Just a little more, and you're all set. Any problems, feel free to give me a shout. All the best, Gazimoff 22:42, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Erkman27&oldid=323783230"