User talk:Erkman27

The Dark Knight

Eric Rob

Colonel Kill Motherfuckers

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Colonel Kill Motherfuckers, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? BlueAzure (talk) 23:42, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The real issue here is trying to convince you guys (the admins) rather than proving the actual validity of the film. But, I'll give it a go. If you will go to the Hack Movies MySpace, you will notice the writer/director/producer Kevin Strange has been interviewed on numerous shows. Also with a google search, you will see Hack Movies, Kevin Strange, and their numerous productions have been purchased, written about, and distributed internationally including dreadcentral.com, faygoluvers.com, and many other top-rated horror venues. Also, collectively the youtube pages for the director and Hack Movies have been viewed hundreds of thousands of times.Erkman27 (talk) 04:03, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Colonel Kill Motherfuckers

I have nominated Colonel Kill Motherfuckers, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colonel Kill Motherfuckers. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Trusilver 20:44, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Future film

Generally, a film that is not yet in production can not have its own article; see WP:CRYSTAL and WP:FILM. Bearian (talk) 15:09, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

By the way ... Welcome!

Hello, Erkman27, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Bearian (talk) 15:09, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article Dead Shit has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 03:57, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Nicholas Hoult. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. DearPrudence (talk) 18:55, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Joe Hammerstone

I have nominated Joe Hammerstone, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Hammerstone. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Trusilver 01:26, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gameheads1.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Gameheads1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. JaGa^talk 07:10, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hey, I've left a reply for you over at DragonFly67's talk page. Thanks, Gazi moff 21:30, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the Films Project

Welcome!

Hey, welcome to WikiProject Films! We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of films, awards, festivals, filmmaking, and film characters. If you haven't already, please add {{User WikiProject Films}} to your user page.

A few features that you might find helpful:

Most of our important discussions about the project itself and its related articles take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.

The project has a monthly newsletter. The newsletter for September has been published. October's issue is currently in production; it will be delivered as a link, but several other formats are available.

There is a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:

Want to jump right into editing? The style guidelines show things you should include.
Want to assist in some current backlogs within the project? Visit the Announcements template to see how you can help.
Want to know how good our articles are? Our assessment department has rated the quality of every film article in Wikipedia. Check it out!

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask another fellow member, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Collectonian

-- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 22:05, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Hack Movies logo.gif

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Hack Movies logo.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Zoo Fari 04:23, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hack Movies

Hi there again Erkman. Just to let you know, I've seen that you asked a question over at Wikiproject Films, and I've moved it into the right place. Hopefully you'll start getting responses to it. Sorry I didn't see your question - if you need to get hold of me head on over to my talk page and I'll usually reply in a day or so. The other thing is that I've had to remove the article from the main encyclopedia (don't worry, it's still in the sandbox) as it's still got a couple of problems:

You need to prove why the company is important. It's not enough for it to exist - it's got to be shown that it's notable for something (like the way it does gore etc.). Most of the stuff you've referenced talks about their latest film rather than the company itself. That makes the film notable, but not really the company. There's a whole bunch of info at Wikipedia:Notability (films) and Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) to help get you started.
You also need to use good quality sources. You can find more info on this at Wikipedia:Reliable sources. As a rule, forum pages and fansites don't qualify as reliable sources.

You're getting there, and I'm hoping that the film guys will start helping you out now. Just a little more, and you're all set. Any problems, feel free to give me a shout. All the best, Gazi moff 22:42, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've just noticed the request at Wikiproject Films. I can't help directly, as I don't know anything about the subject, but have you tried horror magazines or something similar? They seem to be the most likely to have covered the subject and they should count as reliable sources. Small and new companies are a problem as they have rarely been noticed enough to get any press. Specialist media of some kind appears to be the most likely to pick up on them first. To follow on from Gazimoff's advice, I find that once you have good sources the notability is a lot easier to establish. - AdamBMorgan (talk) 21:47, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FILMS October Newsletter

The October 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. The newsletter includes details on the current membership roll call to readd your name from the inactive list to the active list. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 05:58, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Hack Movies

A tag has been placed on Hack Movies, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 07:37, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of CockHammer

The article CockHammer has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Film fails to meet criteria of Wikipedia:Notability (films).

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 07:41, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Hack Movies

I have nominated Hack Movies, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hack Movies. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 08:03, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Amy Fedora

The article Amy Fedora has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article lacks Attribution to Verify WP:BIO or WP:BLP notability criteria.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — 138.88.125.101 (talk) 11:04, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Haunting Kira

The article Haunting Kira has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Film does not meet notability requirements. See: WP:NOTFILM.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — 138.88.125.101 (talk) 19:22, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FILMS' Tag & Assess Drive and Roll Call

The project's Tag & Assess drive has begun. We will be assessing over 50,000 articles during the drive and we need your help! 200-article ranges can be adopted and completed at any pace. A variety of awards are available based on the number of articles assessed. Please help review whatever you are comfortable with, and if you have any questions, leave a message on the talk page of the drive. In addition, please add your name to the active member list if you have not already. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:02, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Haunting Kira poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Haunting Kira poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:09, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Monsterpiece Theatre Volume 1

I have nominated Monsterpiece Theatre Volume 1, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monsterpiece Theatre Volume 1. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Trusilver 18:21, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:SisterMary.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:SisterMary.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:00, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Erkman27/Hack Movies

User:Erkman27/Hack Movies, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Erkman27/Hack Movies and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Erkman27/Hack Movies during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Peacock (talk) 17:56, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Billy Baxter b.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Billy Baxter b.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Eeekster (talk) 22:36, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Billy Baxter b.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Billy Baxter b.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 23:13, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Billy 'Silver Dollar' Baxter

Your addition to Billy 'Silver Dollar' Baxter has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. ttonyb (talk) 01:07, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Billy 'Silver Dollar' Baxter, you may be blocked from editing. Stop adding copyrighted material to articles. You continued addition of this material will result in your be banned from editing or creating articles. ttonyb (talk) 01:28, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Billy 'Silver Dollar' Baxter, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Once more I ask that you stop adding copyrighted material to Wikipedia articles. Your continued addition of such material will get you banned from editing and creating articles. I suggest you read the section above entitled Billy 'Silver Dollar' Baxter for more information. ttonyb (talk) 01:49, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Do you really wish to be banned? What is it you do not understand about not being able to use copyrighted material in Wikipedia? ttonyb (talk) 02:13, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

02:23, 3 May 2011 (UTC)Erkman27 (talk)I actually have no idea what you're talking about. If you are the one that keeps removing the updates to the page, I'll tell you once again TO LEAVE IT ALONE. I won't "ask" again. The information I have used to create this article has been provided by Billy and Billy's son. Neither of them know how to edit Wiki and they don't have time to figure it out except what help I provide them. As I mentioned, Billy's son Jack will be creating a profile and making further edits. Meanwhile, DO NOT TOUCH THE ARTICLE.

I suggest you read WP:OWN. Yes, I am making the changes to the article, you are adding copyrighted material to the article. This is in violation of Wikipedia guidelines and US copyright laws. The other changes I have been making are so the article meets the Wikipedia Manual of Style. I am trying to help you get this article up to speed, not negatively impact it. ttonyb (talk) 02:27, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Erkman27 (talk) 02:33, 3 May 2011 (UTC)Jack is brand new to editing Wiki. I have given him all I can to be able to edit, verify, and manage the article. When he begins doing so, please do not so swiftly post alerts on the page. Allow him to make his way through it and help him. This article is being used in conjunction with press and media coverage for Billy's executive producing Love Stalker so it is imperative that the article is visible and does not have alerts on it. Thank you for understanding.[reply]

Unfortunately, Wikipedia is not for promotion of any sort. ttonyb (talk) 02:40, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Erkman27 (talk) 02:48, 3 May 2011 (UTC)It is becoming increasingly difficult to field your replies with words that do not border on hostile. So please forgive me as I'm trying my best to be tactful here. I am not talking about promoting Wiki. I am talking about maintaining and updating an article on someone who has worked in the film industry for many, many years and is more than notable in any sense. He produced and helped market a legion of Hollywood projects as well as having friendships and business associations with the biggest and most notable on the planet. All I'm asking is that you help Jack to update the page to meet yours and Wiki guidelines.[reply]

First of all, let me make this very clear, I am not being hostile nor is my intent to be hostile. Please assume good faith in all my replies. If you notice, in spite of your initial hostile reply, I refused to reply negatively and if anything have bent over backwards to communicate with you. I assume that this will be the last assumption of hostility.

Now to the point, I was referring to the use of Wikipedia as a tool to promote any entity. If an article can be provided that meets Wikipedia criteria for notability using reliable source then it will survive any review by editors such as myself. I have no issue helping anyone create article, but it can be difficult when one is following Wikipedia guidelines and the edits are reversed without comment as to why. (This is the purpose of communicating on user's talk pages and in the edit summary. I look forward to the changes in the article and helping provide any guidance that I can. ttonyb (talk) 03:03, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is not in any way, shape or form possibly discernible considered "vandalism". This seems more like, at worst, a case of conflict of interest editing and edit warring if anything else. Ttonyb1, could you please phrase your words more carefully so as not to bite the newcomers as they come? :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 02:55, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

TeleComNasSprVen, thank you for interjecting yourself into this conversation. I would suggest you review my attempts to converse with Erkman27 and review the comments on my talk page before you go any further. Additionally, I suggest you review WP:VANDTYPES paying particular attention to the section entitled Copyrighted material, repeated uploading of before you once more incorrectly indicate, that uploading or using material on Wikipedia in ways which violate Wikipedia's copyright policies after having been warned is not vandalism. Also, if you wish to continue this conversation, please move it to my talk page in order to spare Erkman27 having to put up with this. My best to you . ttonyb (talk) 03:45, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Billy Baxter article

Thank you for trying to improve that article. However, in doing so, you've breached a few wikipedia policies that might result in a routine block of your account. It appears that you do not understand why your edits are being reverted, which is a good starting point to resolve the conflict. Until then, please avoid editing the article. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 03:49, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of Nicky, Ricky, Dicky & Dawn episodes, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Amaury (talk) 05:13, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Erik12.jpg

The file File:Erik12.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Erik A Williams1.jpg

The file File:Erik A Williams1.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Erik A Williams1.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Erik A Williams1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 14:20, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Erik A Williams2.jpg

The file File:Erik A Williams2.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Uploaded for Erik A Williams. No other use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 15:44, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]