Jump to content

Paradox

Listen to this article
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 192.75.48.150 (talk) at 17:41, 23 December 2005 (kill Loeb's paradox, alter Curry's paradox). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

For other senses of this word, see paradox (disambiguation).
Listen to this article
(2 parts, 23 minutes)
Spoken Wikipedia icon
These audio files were created from a revision of this article dated
Error: no date provided
, and do not reflect subsequent edits.
Robert Boyle's self-flowing flask fills itself in this diagram, but perpetual motion machines do not exist.

A paradox is an apparently true statement or group of statements that seems to lead to a contradiction or to a situation that defies intuition. Typically, either the statements in question do not really imply the contradiction, the puzzling result is not really a contradiction, or the premises themselves are not all really true (or, cannot all be true together). The recognition of ambiguities, equivocations, and unstated assumptions underlying known paradoxes has led to significant advances in science, philosophy and mathematics.

The word paradox is often used interchangeably with contradiction; but where a contradiction by definition cannot be true, many paradoxes do allow for resolution, though many remain unresolved or only contentiously resolved (such as Curry's paradox). Still more casually, the term is sometimes used for situations that are merely surprising (albeit in a distinctly "logical" manner) such as the Birthday Paradox. This is also the usage in economics, where a paradox is an unintuitive outcome of economic theory.

The etymology of paradox can be traced back to the early Renaissance. Early forms of the word appeared in the late Latin paradoxum and the related Greek paradoxon. The word is composed of the preposition para which means "against" conjoined to the noun stem doxa, meaning "belief". Compare orthodox (literally, "straight teaching") and heterodox (literally, "different teaching"). The liar paradox and other paradoxes were studied in medieval times under the heading insolubilia.

Common themes in paradoxes include direct and indirect self-reference, infinity, circular definitions, and confusion of levels of reasoning. Paradoxes which are not based on a hidden error generally happen at the fringes of context or language, and require extending the context (or language) to lose their paradox quality.

In moral philosophy, paradox plays a central role in ethics debates. For instance, an ethical admonition to "love thy neighbour" is not just in contrast with, but in contradiction to an armed neighbour actively trying to kill you: if he or she succeeds, you will not be able to love him or her. But to preemptively attack them or restrain them is not usually understood as loving. This might be termed an ethical dilemma. Another example is the conflict between an injunction not to steal and one to care for a family that you cannot afford to feed without stolen money.

Types of paradoxes

W. V. Quine (1962) distinguished between three classes of paradoxes.

  • A veridical paradox produces a result that appears absurd but is demonstrated to be true nevertheless. Thus, the paradox of Frederic's birthday in The Pirates of Penzance establishes the surprising fact that a person may be more than Nine years old on his Ninth birthday. Likewise, Arrow's impossibility theorem involves behaviour of voting systems that is surprising but all too true.
  • A falsidical paradox establishes a result that not only appears false but actually is false; there is a fallacy in the supposed demonstration. The various invalid proofs (e.g. that 1 = 2) are classic examples, generally relying on a hidden division by zero. Another example would be the Horse paradox.
  • A paradox which is in neither class may be an antinomy, which reaches a self-contradictory result by properly applying accepted ways of reasoning. For example, the Grelling-Nelson paradox points out genuine problems in our understanding of the ideas of truth and description.

List of paradoxes

Quine's classification, of course, is useful only once a paradox has a clear resolution. That question is treated on the page for each individual paradox; the following are grouped thematically.

Logical (except mathematical)

  • Paradox of entailment: Inconsistent premises always make an argument valid.
  • Raven paradox (or Hempel's Ravens): Observing a red apple increases the likelihood of all ravens being black.
  • Horse paradox: All horses are the same colour.
  • Unexpected hanging paradox: The day of the hanging will be a surprise, so it cannot happen at all, so it will be a surprise.
  • Russell's paradox: Does the set of all those sets that do not contain themselves contain itself?
  • Barber paradox: The adult male barber who shaves all men who do not shave themselves, and no-one else. (A close relative of Russell's paradox.)
  • Richard's paradox: We appear to be able to use simple English to define a decimal expansion in a way which is self-contradictory.

Semantic paradoxes

These form a well-known (and well-studied) class having in common that any permissible assignment of semantic value (truth, reference) to an expression immediately implies the assignment of a different value.

Vagueness

  • Ship of Theseus/George Washington's axe: When every component of the ship has been replaced at least once, is it still the same ship?
  • Sorites paradox: At what point does a heap stop being a heap as I take away grains of sand? Alternately, at what point does someone become bald?

Mathematical and statistical

File:Monty-hall.png
The Monty Hall paradox: which door do you choose?
  • Apportionment paradox: Some systems of apportioning representation can have unintuitive results
  • Arrow's paradox/Voting paradox You can't have all the attributes of an ideal voting system at once.
  • Will Rogers phenomenon: the mathematical concept of an average, whether defined as the mean or median, leads to apparently paradoxical results - for example, it is possible that moving an entry from Wikipedia to Wiktionary would increase the average entry length on both sites
  • Benford's law: In lists of numbers from many real-life sources of data, the leading digit 1 occurs much more often than the others.
  • Berkson's paradox
  • Bertrand's paradox (probability): Different common-sense definitions of randomness give quite different results.
  • Birthday paradox: What is the chance that two people in a room have the same birthday?
  • Borel's paradox: Conditional probability density functions are not invariant under coordinate transformations.
  • Elevator paradox: Elevators can seem to be mostly going in one direction, as if they were being manufactured in the middle of the building and being disassembled on the roof and basement.
  • Hodgson's paradox: the ratio of two Gaussian random variables has neither mean nor variance.
  • Monty Hall problem: An unintuitive consequence of conditional probability.
  • Simpson's paradox: An association in sub-populations may be reversed in the population. It appears that two sets of data separately support a certain hypothesis, but, when considered together, they support the opposite hypothesis.
  • Sleeping beauty paradox: One half or one third? news://rec.puzzles cannot agree on a probability.
  • Statistical paradox: It is quite possible to draw wrong conclusions from correlation. For example, towns with a larger number of churches generally have a higher crime rate — because both result from higher population. A professional organisation once found that economists with a Ph.D. actually had a lower average salary than those with a BS — but this was found to be due to the fact that those with a Ph.D. worked in academia, where salaries are generally lower. This is also called a spurious relationship.
  • Low birth weight paradox: Low birth weight babies have a higher mortality rate, babies of smoking mothers have lower average birth weight, babies of smoking mothers have a higher mortality rate, but low birth weight babies of smoking mothers have a lower mortality rate than other low birth weight babies.
  • Two-envelope paradox: Given two envelopes, one of which contains twice as much money as the other, the benefit seems always to lie in switching from one to the other, and never sticking with your original choice.

Infinity

Geometry and topology

  • Banach-Tarski paradox: Cut a ball into 5 pieces, re-assemble the pieces to get two balls, both of equal size to the first.
  • Gabriel's Horn or Torricelli's trumpet: A simple object with finite volume but infinite surface area. Also, the Mandelbrot set and various other fractals have finite area, but infinite perimeter (in fact, there are no two distinct points on the border of the Mandelbrot set that can be reached from one another by moving a finite distance along the border, which also implies that in a sense you go no further if you walk "the wrong way" around the set to reach a nearby point).
  • Hausdorff paradox: There exists a countable subset C of the sphere S such that S\C is equidecomposable with two copies of itself.
  • Smale's paradox: A sphere can, topologically, be turned inside out.

Psychological, action, and practical reason

  • Abilene paradox: People can make decisions based not on what they actually want to do, but on what they think that other people want to do, with the result that everybody decides to do something that nobody really wants to do, but only what they thought that everybody else wanted to do.
  • Buridan's ass: How can a rational choice be made between two outcomes of equal value?
  • Control paradox: Man can never be free of control, for to be free of control is to be controlled by oneself.
  • Paradox of hedonism: When one pursues happiness itself, one is miserable; but, when one pursues something else, one achieves happiness.
  • Newcomb's paradox: How do you play a game against an omniscient opponent?
  • Kavka's toxin puzzle: Can one intend to drink the deadly toxin, if the intention is the only thing needed to get the reward?
  • Hypocritical paradox: I hate hypocrites, but one thing I hate even more is intolerant hypocrites.

Physical

Philosophy

  • Fermi paradox: If there are many other sentient species in the Universe, then where are they? Shouldn't their presence be obvious?
  • Grandfather paradox: You travel back in time and kill your grandfather before he meets your grandmother which precludes your own conception and, therefore, you couldn't go back in time and kill your grandfather.
  • Liberal paradox
  • Mere addition paradox: Is a large population living barely tolerable lives better than a small happy population?
  • Nihilist paradox: If truth does not exist, the statement "truth does not exist" is a truth, thereby proving itself incorrect.
  • Omnipotence paradox: Can an omnipotent being create a rock too heavy to lift? Can an irresistible force move an unmovable object?
  • Paradox of hedonism: in seeking pleasure, one does not find happiness.
  • Predestination paradox: A man travels back in time and impregnates his great-great-grandmother. The result is a line of offspring and descendants, including the man's parent(s) and the man himself. Therefore, unless he makes the time-travel trip at all, he will never exist.
  • Epicurean paradox, or Problem of evil: The existence of evil is incompatible with the existence of an omnipotent and caring God.
  • Moore's paradox: "It's raining but I don't believe that it is."
  • Zeno's paradoxes: "You will never reach point B from point A as you must always get half-way there, and half of the half, and half of that half, and so on..."

Economics

References

  • Quine, W. V. (1962). "Paradox". Scientific American, April 1962, pp. 84–96.
  • Clarke, Michael (2002). Paradoxes from A to Z. London: Routledge.

See also

External links