User talk:Ttonyb1

---

GHRockerCustoms Request for Speedy Deletion

May I ask why my page has been put up for deletion? I feel that the content that this site provides is equally important as say a Guitar Hero page. It details to users that there are opportunities to better the experience of the users, which the Site that my page is about clearly does. The Guitar Hero page details how to get songs to enhance a users' experience, and so does mine. My site shows how to better the experience of a Tap Tap Revenge User. Please consider removing my site from speedy deletion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by GHRockerTaps09 (talk • contribs) 01:49, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

As stated in the tag, "This page may meet Wikipedia’s criteria for speedy deletion as an article about a web site, blog, web forum, webcomic, podcast, browser game, or similar web content that does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject. See CSD A7." Simply put, the article fails to meet the notability criteria in WP:WEB. ttonyb (talk) 01:52, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Is there anything I can do to prevent it from deletion? I feel that it does show importance to the users of the Tap Tap Revenge community, and should remain live. —Preceding unsigned comment added by GHRockerTaps09 (talk • contribs) 01:56, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Yes, provide evidence it meets WP:WEB. ttonyb (talk) 01:58, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Well I can't seem to find anything in there, but I still feel that it does show some sign of significance and importance. I have nothing left to prove. —Preceding unsigned comment added by GHRockerTaps09 (talk • contribs) 02:02, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Unfortunately, "real-world" notability does not equal Wikipedia based notability. Without establishing Wikipedia notability, it will most likely be deleted. ttonyb (talk) 02:05, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

TRIPHIBIAN GUARD

SUBJECT: OBJECTION TO PROPOSED DELETTION OF "TRIPHIBIAN GUARD" ARTICLE. THE TITTLE SHOULD BE: "TRIPHIBIAN GUARD" NOT TRIPHIAN GUARD IT IS AS RELEVANT AS THE NEAREST COMPETITOR WHICH IS "PERSHING RIFLES". THERE WERE ONLY TWO SUCH ROTC COMPETITIVE AND FRATERNAL ROTC ORGANIZATIONS ON SOUTH ORGANGE CAMPUS AT THAT TIME. THE REMOVAL OF TRIPHIBIAN GUARD WOULD BE UNFAIR IF YOU ALLOW THE PERSHING RIFLES TO REMAIN. THE ARTICLE HAS BEEN IMPROVED AND EDITED FOR ANY POSSIBLE OFFENSIVE CONTENT. IT WILL BE DIFFICULT TO GET FURTHER REFERENCES FROM SETON HALL ARCHIVES BUT I NEED TIME TO DO THAT WITH MY CURRENT BUSY SCHEDULE. BUT I WILL. DENNIS A. SOMMESE —Preceding unsigned comment added by SOMMMESE (talk • contribs) 16:34, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Answered on article talk page. ttonyb (talk) 00:44, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Football's Next Star

Hi someone has being messing with the Football's Next Star next star article writing You Mom and was of the contestants and other stuff that takes from the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gerardmurphy1983 (talk • contribs) 22:20, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Take a look at the article Wikipedia:Vandalism. It is a good guide concerning how to handle vandalism. If you have any questions, please let me know. ttonyb (talk) 00:47, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Tying Tiffany

Hello Ttonyb1. can you please explane me what is is wrong with the page for tying tiffany? sorry but it's my first article.. [1] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Discodada (talk • contribs) 05:24, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

The article is a close copy of her myspace page. ttonyb (talk) 00:54, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of The Kiki Twins

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is The Kiki Twins. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Kiki Twins. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:16, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

National Beer Day

Your ref formatting removes any information about what paper said it and when. I liked my refs because they gave some context. I have nothing against fancy ref templates, but please make them identify the paper and the article title and date, rather than just putting in a link. Your ref 3 just looks like HTML spew. Take a look at Template:Cite news. They have examples of news stories cited to the paper, the author, and the story title, and not just a lot of meaningless HTML about some abstract service where the convenience link is found. The convenience link is not the reference; the original newspaper publication is. Thanks. Edison (talk) 03:05, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

I do not disagree, I started the exercise to remove the embedded link in the ref. (e.g., [1], [2], [3], etc.) I have been running back and forth with other things and have not had a chance to fix item #4. ttonyb (talk) 03:14, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

I made ref 1 into a "cite news" rather than the original form, and strongly encourage you to make the others into similar cite news in=stead of the present cite web, if you can find the time. Thanks. I can hardly wait until New Beer's Eve and National Beer Day. Edison (talk) 05:24, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

I took your advice and I look forward to it as well. My best to you... ttonyb (talk) 17:49, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Scene queen

Can you give me a response and insight on the discussion for deletion for this entry? I appreciate it. --Joe Ryder, eBusiness coach and web visionary (Vancouver, WA) (talk) 03:59, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Comment added to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scene queen. ttonyb (talk) 18:09, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Golf Association of Philadelphia Page Deletion

I'd like to create a page for the Golf Association of Philadelphia, but it's been tagged for speedy deletion because of copyright infringement. I'm a representative of the organization, and I want to create a GAP page on Wikipedia. It will be unbiased and strictly factual. It will be simply for reference, as Wikipedia is a great vehicle for obtaining information. What do I need to do to prevent it from being deleted?

Gap Golf (talk) 15:10, 4 February 2010 (UTC)Tony, Golf Association of Philadelphia

Not sure why deletion

check out my note on the page, but also check out Lucidera and QlikTech International wiki pages. Nearly identical in structure. Just want parity and fairness in presentation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bradleypeters (talk • contribs) 20:01, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Addressed in article page changes. ttonyb (talk) 16:14, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Lauri Kytömaa speedy

Hi, in this talk page edit, you say that a speedy delete was placed on Lauri Kytömaa [2], yet that didn't actually happen. I was going to raise other issues with the article, but a delete might be best. Regards, Piano non troppo (talk) 16:04, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Actually it was removed by the author of the article in [3]. I have replaced it. Thanks for the heads up. ttonyb (talk) 16:12, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Koffee Kate's

What can i do to add more info to Koffee Kate's as they have no website for me to check. i am not contesting the speedy deletion im just trying to see if i can make it better.WiteinkρεβῼTalk/Stalk 02:53, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

Nevermind it was already deleted.WiteinkρεβῼTalk/Stalk 02:56, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

For future reference, you might want to look at WP:COMPANY. ttonyb (talk) 02:59, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks I'll do that.WiteinkρεβῼTalk/Stalk 03:00, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

I have also left you a Welcome message on your talk page. It contains some very useful links. If you have any questions, please let me know. ttonyb (talk) 03:02, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for helping me. i tried getting help from halfshadow but he doesnt like me.WiteinkρεβῼTalk/Stalk 03:12, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

He/she may just be a bit busy. My best to you... ttonyb (talk) 03:14, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

he told me to stop writing on his page.WiteinkρεβῼTalk/Stalk 03:15, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

If you did nothing to deserve it, I would not worry about it. ttonyb (talk) 03:19, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

Josh Sanders

Josh Sanders (deletion): The newly posted article for "Josh Sanders" is 100% accurate and I encourage you to take a second look. CMJ is the college music journal which charts american radio stations weekly. Smile Thru This was not just a local Milwaukee, WI indie band... they had a major national following, national radio airplay and toured nationally extensively. Everything in this article and wikipedia page is 100% accurate. Thank you so much for reconsiderating deleting this page. Not alot of people make it out of Portage, WI and Josh Sanders was one of them. It was be great to list him on the Portage, WI wikipedia page. Thank you! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Staytheyear (talk • contribs) 05:31, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

The page has already been deleted as a result of it being an article recreated after deletion that resulted from a prior AfD discussion. ttonyb (talk)

Josh Sanders deletion

This page should not have been deleted! All information was correct and accurate. Please check again. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Staytheyear (talk • contribs) 05:37, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

I will repeat this for you again, the page has already been deleted as a result of it being an article recreated after deletion that resulted from a prior AfD discussion. I suggest you refrain from adding articles that have been deleted as a result of AfD discussions. ttonyb (talk) 05:40, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for your revert of vandalism on my user talk page.--BaronLarf 05:57, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

My pleasure, sorry you had to be a victim of a childish act. My best to you... ttonyb (talk) 06:04, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

Clinton engine

I was overwhelmed with the huge amount of explanation as to why work of mine was deleted. The problem with "too much information" is whereas it may be an attempt to look intelligent, the underlying reality is it is just plain rude. I am not a genius at Wikipedia, (I doubt if many are given the volumes of cut-and-pasted information they are given to read). In my career of 34 years in IT we knew better then to treat clients, people, etc... like that. If you want to be be more successful in whatever you do, don't overload people with tons of text, it's futile. Make it as they say: "short and sweet". You will probably get less shout letters too. Don't bother thanking me for the free advice,(I used to get paid big dollars for it before the financial fallout). I just thought you were a nice guy who would listen beyond the "cut and paste". If I can get a clear definition on how to resubmit my content, I will. Let us consider evolving, it helps everyone, and we need more then ever now! Jack Hallaran — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hallaran (talk • contribs)

<sigh>I will ignore your unwelcome rant and rave that verges on your being uncivil and simply equate the diatribe with your frustration of having an article deleted.</sigh>

First of all, I did not delete your article, I only nominated it for deletion. My nomination was reviewed by an admin and the nomination was apparently deemed as valid, hence the deletion. If you had taken a quick breath and read the notice before sending me a message – please do not leave messages on user pages, please use the talk page instead. – you would have seen the statement, "This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article."

The explanation was shorter than your rant and seems to make perfect sense. I suggest you click on the link (once more here it is) and review it to see if you understand the explanation. If you are still perplexed I am willing to answer any reasonable questions you might have concerning how to avoid deletion. ttonyb (talk) 19:31, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

February 2010

"Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Trusteer, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you...."

I created the page and was in the middle of adding extra information when this obnoxious banner appeared. It would be far more beneficial for you to be adding content to articles instead of defacing them with warning messages. dila (talk) 22:54, 6 February 2010 (UTC)