User talk:VS6507

April 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Encyclopedia Britannica Eleventh Edition, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gaelen S. (talk • contribs) 08:30, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Talk:Spore (2008 video game) has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. ~ Butros (Talk) 12:14, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Ivana Kurcmanović has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 22:43, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Ivana Kuzmanović

A tag has been placed on Ivana Kuzmanović requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 23:16, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Ivana Kuzmanović, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Tad Lincoln (talk) 23:20, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ivana Kuzmanović

The article was deleted because it did not indicate how the subject was notable by Wikipedia standards. ... discospinster _talk 13:47, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Workingterrier1.jpg

Hi I did not delete the picture you nominated, because firstly it is still used on these pages:

Jack Russell Terrier
Working terrier

and the comments on the commons do not match, in particular the person creating the picture is inconsistent Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:57, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Angela Tiger.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Angela Tiger.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free image with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria.

If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the image can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{non-free fair use in|article name that the image is used in}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the image. If the image has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. APK (If You Wanna) 09:33, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Sookie_(TB).jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Sookie_(TB).jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? PhilKnight (talk) 10:48, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Aleksa Lukic

Please help translate a short part of Tan Son Nhat International Airport into Serbian Wikipedia. Thank you for your help. If you need any help in translating Serbian topics into Vietnamese, I will be ready to do.Genghiskhan (talk) 04:14, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of ConQUIZtador

A tag has been placed on ConQUIZtador requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Eeekster (talk) 21:39, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Extensive type of agriculture

Is this the same thing as extensive farming? Kansan (talk) 20:22, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Page renaming

I have restored the two pages, Extensive farming and Intensive farming to their original names. These terms are in common use, changing the article titles is controversial, and requires more justification than an edit summary. If you wish to proceed with the renaming, please discuss your justifications for the move on each of the article talk pages, and hold off on the move until a consensus is reached on the talk pages. Dialectric (talk) 17:16, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks Aleksa Lukic (talk) 17:18, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

IMH belgrade

looks as if it's patrolled now Jimfbleak - talk to me? 18:42, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Patrolling

I think you just do it Jimfbleak - talk to me? 12:52, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gingrich

Did you read my edit summary? The information I removed is irrelevant to his biography and is also weasel words, "some commentators say..." Thanks, Kaisershatner (talk) 14:10, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Industrial ceramic

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Industrial ceramic. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Ceramic engineering. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Ceramic engineering - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Teapotgeorge^Talk 11:39, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Scarlett GI Joe

User Doctorfacts is just going to keep on editing that[pagehttp://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Scarlett_%28G.I._Joe%29&action=historysubmit&diff=361869501&oldid=361868893]

and Duke's page[1] no matter what anyone says. The only answer to this is to block the page or to block that user. NamelessConsular (talk) 11:42, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]