User talk:WikiDan61

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, then place {{Talkback|your username}} on my talk.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, then place {{Talkback|WikiDan61}} on your talk.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

Please post all new discussions at the END of the page, to allow for easier chronological tracking! Thank you! WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 18:44, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, WikiDan61. You have new messages at 201077FOURTH's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

HERE

Not sure what your point is. Care to clarify? WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 14:49, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Do the math... User:Caribbean_H.Q. + User:Marine 69-71 + User:Mercy11 = One (201077FOURTH (talk) 14:54, 21 September 2010 (UTC))[reply]

If you are claiming that all three users are, in fact, the same person, you are free to open an investigation at WP:Sock puppet investigations. However, since both Caribbean H.Q. and Marine 69-71 are administrators, the accusation seems unlikely. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 15:03, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the detailed. (201077FOURTH (talk) 15:06, 21 September 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Move

i dont get it how is my press releases self made they are not the boot.com is a credible site i am very good friends with the band brother clyde in billy ray cyrus and my artist has done a song with him that was released on universal Fontana--Billboarder22 (talk) 20:36, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

University of the Sacred Heart (Puerto Rico) - -to - - Sagrado Corazón (201077FOURTH (talk) 15:22, 21 September 2010 (UTC))[reply]

I can't concur that this is a good move. If anything, the article might be moved to Universidad del Sagrado Corazón, as that is the university's official name in Spanish, but generally (per WP:MOSNAME, articles on the English Wikipedia should be titled with the name that best reflects the English translation of the foreign name. A redirect from the foreign name can be created. However, since there was already an article at Sagrado Corazón, you don't get to just delete that content for this content. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 15:34, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, you deal with it... I am done with this district... Bad urban planning... A Census Data filled with misinformation... (201077FOURTH (talk) 15:44, 21 September 2010 (UTC))[reply]

I can't speak to the character of the district, having never been there. I can only speak to the policies of Wikipedia, which I am attempting to follow in cleaning up articles about Puerto Rico, and lots of other topics. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 15:46, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well said. (201077FOURTH (talk) 15:49, 21 September 2010 (UTC))[reply]

George M Murray

Hi Dan we have three reliable sources but the article got deleted again. do you know what im doing wrong and what other information i will need in order for my artical to go through?

Thanks

 Susan0713 (talk) 18:49, 21 September 2010 (UTC)Susan[reply]

As of this writing, the George M. Murray, Ph. D. (Scientist) article is still alive and kicking. However, there are no sources listed on the page. If you have sources, please add them. Since the article is proposed for deletion as an unreferenced BLP, you have 10 days to find and add sources. Of course, the article may be proposed for speedy deletion before that if someone determines there is something other than a simple lack of sources wrong with the article. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 18:54, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Dan - I believe we got the references in finally. Thanks for your help!!

Susan0713 (talk) 18:18, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

Hello, WikiDan61. You have new messages at JeremyMcClean's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

9.22

Hello, WikiDan61. You have new messages at Plastic Beach's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

No Conflict of Interest

A colleague posted an entry about me. It was entirely accurate but needed references and citations that she was unable to provide. I added them. I do not see my additions as a conflict of interest, for she wrote the entry. Incidentally, everything that is mentioned in the entry can be verified by consulting my curriculum vita at http://www.nku.edu/~rhode/cv.htm. Do you require additional verification of any facts in the entry? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Robertrhode (talk • contribs) 12:28, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As I have already pointed out on your talk page, your own c.v. is hardly a valid reference. Please see WP:RS. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:30, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Source

I just noticed that a resume is not a reliable source. A curriculum vita is not a resume, but I will not argue the point. What source do you require to verify the Road Roller Assn.'s award of the Silver Jubilee Certificate, which is framed and hanging on the wall behind me while I type this question? I have a letter from the Assn. in my professional dossier. Do I need to FAX the letter? In what way can anyone verify that I have published over two hundred articles, short of listing all of them as shown on my CV, which is many pages long? Perhaps it would prove helpful to know that, at the university where I have been employed for the past thirty years, I have undergone an annual review by the chair of my department to verify that the accomplishments that are listed on my curriculum vita are legitimate. I look forward to your reply. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Robertrhode (talk • contribs) 12:42, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In order to be a valid citation, the information would have had to been published in a publicly available document, such as a magazine, newspaper, etc. The source does not have to be available online, but it does have to be publicly available, such as at a library. A certificate owned by you personally does not qualify. If the association has a website, and that website contains a reference to your award, that would do nicely. Failing that, the reference is probably not valid. As a further note, I do not believe that your biography meets the criteria for inclusion for biographies. While you may be well-known among the community of steam roller enthusiasts, that community is rather small, and notability among that rather small community does not equate to general notability. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:52, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Page

Thank you for explaining that being an internationally recognized authority on the history and literature of North American agricultural steam engines and steamrollers is not noteworthy. I respectfully request that the page that my colleague posted be deleted immediately. Kindest regards. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Robertrhode (talk • contribs) 12:58, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You can make such a request by nominating the article for deletion. Know that this is my opinion only, and my not be shared by other members of the Wikipedia community. You are free to seek other opinions on the matter. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 13:24, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

move my article from english wikipedia to latvian wikipedia.

Hi! I wrote (by mistake) my latvian article "Komandas psiholoģija" here in english wikipedia and i would like to move it to latvian wikipedia, but i just do not know how to do it. :) Maybe you can help me?! Thanks!

I don't know that there is a mechanism to move an article between Wikipedias. I would suggest you place the {{helpme}} template on your own talk page followed by the same question, and an administrator will come along to help you. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 17:12, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I just solve this problem by deleting my article from english page and after that copying it to latvian.--Ilzitek (talk) 17:28, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re:John

I suggest you both, User:Jonas Bronx and User:WikiDan61, bring up the situation with a more experienced admin. such as User:Mindspillage since my real life obligations have contributed to my limited time here for now. Take care. Tony the Marine (talk) 20:11, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why u do not want to be an admin

You know a lot about the policy, so therefore you would be a strong administrator candidate. I would prbly vote for you, except sometimes you are rude to other users. So if i have to give you some constructive criticism, I would say try not to be so rude to users who are not as smart as you, but for the most part you would be a good admin so I would vote for you unless you do some things to mess up.--Bad edits r dumb (talk) 21:09, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks but no thanks. My reasons for not wanting the bit are my own concern. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 21:12, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ok. if you would like me to nominate you, pls let me know. JUST KIDDING!!!! u should have someone nominate u who has a good reputation and lots of experience because if Bad edits r dumb nominated you everyone would be like WUT???????--Bad edits r dumb (talk) 21:16, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, WikiDan61. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ernandes Dias Luz.
Message added 12:25, 23 September 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saskatchewan Roughriders all time records and statistics

You write: "These are lists of records within the individual teams, which records are not necessarily notable. Whereas there are articles such as New York Yankees award winners and league leaders, these articles highlight the league-wide accomplishments of the team's players, not the team-specific records. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 19:57, 23 September 2010 (UTC)"

Hmmm ... maybe you'd like to delete all these articles:

Category:Major League Baseball team records

or these ones:

Category:National Hockey League statistical records

You're sort of a jerk, right? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tigercat222 (talk • contribs)

You did notice that I withdrew the nomination, did you not? At first glance, such material did not appear notable, but as I looked at other articles in the same category I realized that I was in the minority with that view. I'm sorry I forgot to post a notice on your talk page that the nomination had been withdrawn. And please remember not to make personal attacks.WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 11:18, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That was not a personal attack. It is my opinion based on empirical observation. Perhaps you can take time to research and analyze an item or entry before unilaterally decide that it should be deleted. Giving this topic even a brief amount of consideration and comparative analysis would have led you to your finally conclusion, without the bother and discourtesy of the threatened deletions. To wit: it would have been the nice and responsible thing to do. Which is why I think you are a ... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tigercat222 (talk • contribs)

USLS1 - Talkback 1,000,000,001

Hello, WikiDan61. You have new messages at USLS1's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

USLS1 - Talkback 1,000,000,000

Always remember to keep all categories tagged Example: Category:Aguadilla, Puerto Rico

I believe such overcategorization is inappropriate. This has been discussed on WT:WikiProject Puerto Rico. You might want to join the conversation there. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 14:22, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

USLS1 - Talkback 999,999,999

You can use Borinquen (Caguas) as practice. (USLS1 (talk) 14:26, 24 September 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Practice for what?? WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 14:29, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

To get your account suspended for Wikihounding. (USLS1 (talk) 14:48, 24 September 2010 (UTC))[reply]

It's not WP:Stalker#Wikihounding to find someone with a history of poor articles and attempt to clean up those articles. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 15:02, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. I might suggest that you are the wikihound for edits such as this, where you injected yourself into an article that I had tagged, but which is completely outside of the field of interest that your other edits would indicate. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 15:04, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Querella 9-24-2010

My suggestion is that you both (User talk:USLS1 and User:WikiDan61) state your case and seek a solution with the Arbitration Committee here: Dispute resolution requests since I am not a member of said committee. Tony the Marine (talk) 19:11, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

re:

I think you need to open a SPI case, I will post supporting the case, but if USLS1 keep making edits like this, you need to bring it up to WP:ANI so the account can be block. --Jmundo (talk) 00:25, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AN/I Notice

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. It's located here: [1] Thank you. ROBERTMFROMLI ^TALK/_CNTRB 02:35, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Response

Take me off this list here and please abstain from writing ludicrous statements on my wall. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Merrytimes (talk • contribs) 17:08, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There is a section on the SPI page where you are free to make any statements you care to in your own defense. I stand by the list; if you care to refute the accusation, please do so. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 17:11, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Again

Please stop writing senseless comments and reverting edits on my wall. (Merrytimes (talk) 17:38, 27 September 2010 (UTC))[reply]

My edits are not senseless. I am trying to help you properly respond to the SPI case against you. USLS1 (talk · contribs) has no business removing my comments from your talk page, unless you and he (she) are one and the same person (which is the problem the SPI is trying to address). You are free to remove my comments from your talk page; other users are not. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 17:42, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Again (2nd Time)

Please stop reverting edits on my wall. (Merrytimes (talk) 18:09, 27 September 2010 (UTC))[reply]

I did not revert your last edit on your talk page. You had removed my talkback notice, and I placed a new talkback notice. However, I will respect your wishes and refrain from contacting you on your talk page unless your edits require further communication. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 18:14, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Final Note

No you. I exhort you not to write bias vapid-communications or perform abusive methods of Persecution in my TALK page for your own personal amusement. (Merrytimes (talk) 18:41, 27 September 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Nobody Cares

Stop wanting yourself from being noticed. Nobody really cares about your influence over wikipedia under your so hundreds of accounts, your twenty ish administrator accounts and your thousands of fake written articles under your lame named puppet accounts. Nobody really cares. Buy yes, stop interfering with the Puerto Rico Project for your own amusement or tryings to define the real identity of its common contributors or administrators. (Merrytimes (talk) 19:30, 27 September 2010 (UTC))[reply]

I don't have hundreds of accounts. I have one. And with that one account, I strive to keep Wikipedia a place where people can come and find meaningful and true information. If that means I butt heads with people whose goals are otherwise, than so be it. My involvement in Wikipedia:WikiProject Puerto Rico has been solely in cleaning up poorly created articles. If Merrytimes (talk · contribs) thinks that is interference, he should remember that he does not own the articles. If Merrytimes is unhappy that I have accused him of sock puppetry, he has the right to defend himself at the appropriate venue, or to simply ignore the matter and let the reviewing administrators make the decision. However, his vandalism since the accusation was made speaks for itself. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 19:45, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Stop Using my Talk Page

For your own amusement. Use your sandbox or Microsoft Word to keep experimenting on how to talk to yourself. (Merrytimes (talk) 20:32, 27 September 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Loooser (Merrytimes (talk) 20:35, 27 September 2010 (UTC))[reply]

I'll stop posting vandalism warnings on your user page when you stop vandalizing. And please don't engage in personal attacks. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 20:38, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Miaaw.com

Speedy deletion nomination of Spécial:Contributions/Fraddk

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Fraddk (talk) 22:13, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

I posted this about Miaaw.com, and it was not a test, should I understand it needs more development?

thanks for help and/or advices

Fraddk

The point is moot now as your article has 1) been moved to your user space and 2) blanked, but I will try to explain to you why I tagged the page as I did. The name of the page was inappropriate: it should have been created at Miaaw.com, not at [[::Spécial:Contributions/Fraddk]]. There is a page titled Special:Contributions/Fraddk that will list all of the contributions you have made since creating your account; replacing the word "Special" with "Spécial" causes confusion. Since your article name appeared confusing, I had two options:

Move the article to the proper address or
Tag the article for deletion

I would have chosen the first option except, as has been pointed out by another editor when he blanked the page, it consisted of nothing but promotional language for the group involved. Wikipedia is not here to promote any given entity. So the only option left was to tag the article for deletion. Since the article was created at an obviously incorrect location, I assumed that you were testing the system (it was your first contribution), so I marked it as a test page. Sorry for any confusion. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:38, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]