Jump to content

User talk:Sco1996

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Sco1996 (talk | contribs) at 12:48, 30 September 2010. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

File:User Sco1996(decoration-for-user-page).PNG

Your userpage

Hey, seems you've been having trouble with socks and vandals. I hope you don't mind, but I took the liberty of semi-protecting your userpage. If you watn it unprotected- now or in the future, just say. Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:17, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've blocked your friend! Hopefully that will solve your problems. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:15, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination

I changed the reasoning to "test page" "attack page". It obviously doesn't meet notability standards, it disparages a living person, and as mentioned below, you're publicly identifying an editor. Don't do it again. APK whisper in my ear 07:34, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Outing

Please refrain from outing other members of a Wikimedia Foundation project, even if that member is a vandal. Please see this. Thank you. PoeticVerse (talk) 07:39, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In response to the message you left on my talk page: I can understand how that is a good intention, however we generally don't allow outing at all. PoeticVerse (talk) 12:37, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Nice to see that someone understands my intentions. Sco 1996 | I will respond. 12:36, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Syrthiss (talk) 12:33, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page User:!JAMIEIMAJ!. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:06, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:!JAMIEIMAJ! is definetly not a sockpuppet of Larry jefferson so I removed the notice. However, he still a vandal and should remain blocked. Sco1996 | I will respond. 10:09, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I have actually come back to remove the notice I posted above and apologise, having looked further and realised that the evidence of sockpuppetry was not conclusive, but you have beaten me to it. I have rolled back my own edit to !JAMIEIMAJ!'s user page. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:12, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Apology accepted. Sco1996 | I will respond. 09:57, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SuperTux

Hi, have you read my edit summary? Please reply at Talk:SuperTux. Hekerui (talk) 12:48, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

re Ronald Spelts

OK, I'm sure he does exist then. But "Ronald Spelts" gives zero Google hits. It's somewhat unusual in this day and age for that to happen. Even the most unnoteworthy person -- you, me, anybody -- usually generates some hits.

Unfortunately, I cannot review the article Ronald Spelts because I have lost my administrator rights and thus cannot read or restore the article. If you want the article restored, you should go to the administrator's noticeboard and ask for the case of Ronald Spelts to be reviewed by an admin, noting that the deleting admin is unable to do so. Note that if a reasonable case that Mr Spelts meets our requirements for notability cannot be made, the article is unlikely to be restored. For a person who generates zero Google hits to be an actually notable person would be unique and unprecedented, I guess, but you never know. Herostratus (talk) 02:24, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK, fine. Try the procedure I described above. Herostratus (talk) 14:10, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Larry jefferson

Perhaps you could find a way to persuade whoever that is behind those accounts to stop playing around with Wikipedia? T. Canens (talk) 15:03, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing new

It's just that a sockpuppet wanted to redirect your talkpage abusively, but it's reverted now. Anyway, happy editing! Minimac (talk) 15:49, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Recess seems to be over

Your very special friend has been up to its usual tricks, so I've protected your talk page for a month. If for some reason you wish to have the protection removed, just drop me a note. Favonian (talk) 16:09, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Day1 of Construction.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Day1 of Construction.JPG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 09:05, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sco1996&oldid=387906599"