Jump to content

Space and survival

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by James Doehring (talk | contribs) at 22:40, 18 November 2010 (→‎See also). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Space and survival is the relationship between outer space and the long-term survival of the human species and civilization. It is based on the observation that space colonization and space science would prevent many human extinction scenarios. A related observation is the limited time and resources thought by some to be available for the colonization of space.

Uses of space colonization

Extinction can be prevented by improving the physical barrier or increasing the mean distance between people and the potential extinction event. For example, people may survive imminent explosions by being in a bunker or evacuating. Pandemics are controlled by putting exposed people in quarantine and moving healthy people away. Our lineage, genus Homo, has reduced from several species co-existing on Earth to just one — all but our own going extinct before the end of the last Ice age. This illustrates that our species is not immune to planetary disaster and that our survival may be better assured if we proceed with the colonization of space.

Barrier

Life support systems that enable people to live in space may also allow them to survive hazardous events. For example, an infectious disease or biological weapon that transmits through the air could not infect a person in a closed life support system, as an internal supply of air and a physical barrier would exist between the person and the affected environment.

Location and distance

Expanding the living area of the human species increases the mean distance between humans and any hazardous event. People closest to the event are most likely to be killed or injured; people furthest from the event are most likely to survive.

Multiple locations

Increasing the number of places where humans live also helps to prevent extinction. For example, if a massive impact event occurred on Earth without warning, the human species could possibly become extinct; its art, culture and technology would be lost. However, if humans had previously colonized locations outside Earth, the opportunities for the survival and recovery of the species would be greater.

Opportunities for space colonization

Space colonies do not currently exist. It can be said, however, that humans have had a continuous space presence since 2000 due to the International Space Station. There is concern that the human species may lose its organized societies or its technological knowledge, use up resources or even become extinct before it colonizes space.

The author Sylvia Engdahl wrote about the "Critical Stage", a period of time when a civilization has both the technology to expand into space and the technology to destroy itself. Engdahl states that the human civilization is at a Critical Stage, but that the funding for space exploration and colonization is minuscule compared to the funding for weapons of mass destruction and military forces.

NBC News space analyst James Oberg commented that "It's just a matter of waiting until we get some kind of cosmic 9/11 that will make everyone say 'why didn't we see this before,' and then we'll have enough money to afford these programs."[1]

Uses of space science

The observation and study of space protects Earth, as space hazards can be seen in advance and, if they are discovered early enough, acted against.

Near-Earth objects

Near-Earth Objects (NEOs) are asteroids, comets and large meteoroids that come close to or collide with Earth. Spaceguard is the collective name for some of the efforts to discover and study NEOs; however these efforts are not highly funded.[citation needed]

Objections

Creating a backup colony in space would be a very costly method of ensuring human survival in the event of catastrophe, and it's likely that other ways of creating an independent colony could be more cost efficient. While extinctions occur on the order of tens of millions of years, major damage to the structure of the Earth itself is likely on the order of billions of years. As a result, an independent surface colony, or an oceanic or sub-terrestrial colony may be a cheaper way to obtain a similar but less robust result.[citation needed]

Also, a space colony could conceivably revolt and pursue its own independent self-interests. In terrestrial civilizations, this occurs on the order of every 10 to 100 years. Even a loyal colony may decide that it would be against its economic or political interests to aid a troubled Earth, or to recolonize Earth.[citation needed]

The survivability and sustainability of a colony could potentially be less than the survivability and sustainability of the Earth population, especially during a colony's infancy. Creating colonies that can reliably withstand the rigors of space and unpredictable extraterrestrial environments for thousands of years may be very expensive. The creation of a colony that not only survives, but also grows to a scale where it can support programs to create its own new colonies is a far more difficult and expensive task.[citation needed]

References

See also

Further reading

External links