User talk:-5-

; Archives
	March 2006 — January 2009; February 2009 — August 2009; August 2009 — September 2010; September 2010 — November 2010;

This user is one of the 400 most active English Wikipedians of all time.

Superman and other edits

Thanks for your continuing edits with some of your articles. It's good to know that someone else cares about quality and supervises annoying IP edits. Cheers. Wildroot (talk) 08:43, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Behind the Voice Actors

I saw that you reverted a guy because you said that "behind the voice actors is user-submitted". Content there is actually not submitted by anyone. There are only a few administrators with the power to add content, and they make sure they get it from the right sources. Just saying. --Shadoman (talk) 14:43, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Spider-Man reboot

Hey -5-, where you've been. There's been a update on the Spider-Man reboot ;). http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/blogs/heat-vision/spider-man-set-parents-villain-56039 − Jhenderson⁷⁷⁷ 15:27, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know you don't have to edit on the userpage, I put it out as a article since it should be filming today. − Jhenderson⁷⁷⁷ 15:55, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not really worried about that too much. Because it's obvious it's going to happen. But I did put it back as a redirection for now. Now it can easily be ready more than it was. − Jhenderson⁷⁷⁷ 16:05, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know you don't have to entirely accurate in linking. Sometimes linking in a redirecting title can be better and simpler because you never know when it can be an article. − Jhenderson⁷⁷⁷ 17:24, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I understand because I used to feel that way but I got over it. Besides the redirections are of good use for stuff like that. That's why they are created. − Jhenderson⁷⁷⁷ 17:28, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am just curious. I have no idea what you are doing or did in contributions such as this. − Jhenderson⁷⁷⁷ 19:51, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh ok then. − Jhenderson⁷⁷⁷ 23:21, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help with the reboot. I have nominated it on the DYK. So fingers crossed. − Jhenderson⁷⁷⁷ 01:59, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Spider-Man reboot 2

Yeah, but it was confirmed months ago Rhys Ifans would play the Lizard. Look it up on IMBd or something. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.61.180.182 (talk) 19:40, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.movieline.com/2010/10/5-villains-that-would-be-cooler-than-the-lizard-in-spider-man-reboot.php Ha! There! Irrefutable proof! Rhys Ifans is officially the Lizard! 96.61.180.182 (talk) 03:21, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

bias?

Why do you keep removing a legitimate review from Spiderman 3? Are you biased? Do you not like it because it's not favorable? Why won't you leave it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.69.112.250 (talk) 05:07, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reply.

Ok then you don't have to tell me. I know you know what's your doing and trust your judgement. − Jhenderson⁷⁷⁷ 18:53, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's rare for Superhero Hype! to be the original source of reporting. They a lot of times get information they already heard. − Jhenderson⁷⁷⁷ 19:18, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Dark Knight rises

On that redirection page, it might be a good idea to request semi-protection if it's mostly just IP editors that are the problem. What do you think? − Jhenderson⁷⁷⁷ 19:44, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's taking care of. Don't even try to edit on it because you can't. − Jhenderson⁷⁷⁷ 21:28, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Untitled Spider-Man Reboot

On 15 December 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Untitled Spider-Man Reboot, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Sony plans to develop a Spider-Man reboot starring Andrew Garfield (pictured) as Spider-Man that will be released in 2011 in 3-D? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 18:04, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Spider-Man reboot

This discussion is all yours now. Good luck! − Jhenderson⁷⁷⁷ 18:11, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

71.163.224.4

I would appreciate it if you can review 71.163.224.4 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)'s edits. I reverted all of the "top" edits that he/she made on the assumption that a vandal's edits are generally unreliable and therefore should not be trusted, but I'd like you to look over them to see if you think that some of my reverts should themselves be reverted. I have no knowledge in the field. --Nlu (talk) 05:00, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Avengers: Earth's Mightiest Heroes

Just wanted to let you know that I agree with your to the article. I didn't care for the previous layout either.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 13:09, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas!

Click this gift to see what your Christmas gift is. − Santa^Claus 00:35, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Young Justice schedule

So was I right in my edit summary that Futon blew it, and the pilot is re-airing over those first two weeks in January? The link to that source isn't working on my end (why I rejected it as unsourced), but I've seen you editing on Batman B&B so I know you're not arbitrary...if it is, I may have to petition to unprotect the page. Only fair. KnownAlias contact 10:37, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind...Google Chrome wouldn't load it with the www. When I loaded the link without it, I got through. KnownAlias contact 10:44, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the protection is for a week, which seems a long time for good information. I'm-a gonna pull it. KnownAlias contact 10:47, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]