User talk:Snowolf
Snowolf's talk page | |
---|---|
|
The Signpost: 7 February 2011
- News and notes: New General Counsel hired; reuse of Google Art Project debated; GLAM newsletter started; news in brief
- WikiProject report: Stargazing aboard WikiProject Spaceflight
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Open cases: Shakespeare authorship – Longevity; Motions on Date delinking, Eastern European mailing list
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
User:Snowolf/LO2
User:Snowolf/LO2 is showing up in a lot of article space categories.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 09:07, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 14 February 2011
- News and notes: Foundation report; gender statistics; DMCA takedowns; brief news
- In the news: Wikipedia wrongly blamed for Super Bowl gaffe; "digital natives" naive about Wikipedia; brief news
- WikiProject report: Articles for Creation
- Features and admins: RFAs and active admins—concerns expressed over the continuing drought
- Arbitration report: Proposed decisions in Shakespeare and Longevity; two new cases; motions passed, and more
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Added template for SuggestBot
Hi,
Thanks for being one of SuggestBot's users! I hope you have found the bot's suggestions useful.
We are in the process of switching from our previous list-based signup process to using templates and userboxes, and I have therefore added the appropriate template to your user talk page. You should receive the first set of suggestions within a day, and since we'll be automating SuggestBot you will from then on continue to receive them regularly at the desired frequency.
We now also have a userbox that you can use to let others know you're using SuggestBot, and if you don't want to clutter your user talk page the bot can post to a sub-page in your userspace. More information about the userbox and usage of the template is available on User:SuggestBot/Getting Recommendations Regularly.
If there are any questions, please don't hesitate to get in touch with me on my user talk page. Thanks again, Nettrom (talk) 21:04, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
speedy deletion
You have not explained why Robert Pitcairn (antiquary) fails WP:N criteria, please do that or restore the article. Robert Pitcairn (antiquary) has a notice in the DNB, as noted in the references, they are notable. cygnis insignis 13:45, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
That is how they are noted in the Dictionary of National Biography, which was in the article. Restore the article and nominate it for deletion, it makes the assertion of notability and is not a valid candidate for speedy deletion. cygnis insignis 14:04, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
- The DNB editor thinks he is notable as an antiquary! the article showed that and so does the abstract, your opinion of this is irrelevant. You seem to indicate he probably is notable, so you know it will pass through AfD, but take the discussion there instead if you want to waste more time on this. cygnis insignis 14:19, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 20:01, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
Reversion
? Did you read my edit summary, or the linked article? The article is engaging in WP:SYNTHESIS. 86.26.60.18 (talk) 02:08, 19 February 2011 (UTC)