Jump to content

Death panel

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Hauskalainen (talk | contribs) at 20:45, 6 March 2011 (→‎Reactions and analysis: remove more nonsense... Palin said NOTHING about NICE in the UK... this is pure bollox). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Sarah Palin

"Death panel" is a political term coined in August 2009 on the Facebook page of former Governor of Alaska Sarah Palin. She suggested that health care legislation being debated in the U.S. Congress would create an America "in which my parents or my baby with Down Syndrome will have to stand in front of Obama's 'death panel' so his bureaucrats can decide, based on a subjective judgment of their 'level of productivity in society,' whether they are worthy of health care." There was no such term or explicit provision in the bill.[1] A provision including Medicare payments for voluntary counseling between a doctor and a patient on end-of-life issues and advance directives was the trigger for the 'death panel' concerns. The uproar the phrase inspired was described by TIME and The Washington Post as almost taking down President Obama's health care reform.

Some Republicans initially supported Palin's allegation, while other Republicans criticized the statement. PolitiFact.com called "death panels" the "Lie of the Year";[2] FactCheck.org referred to it as one of their "whoppers" of 2009. The American Dialect Society, a group of English language scholars, reported that "death panel" was their "most outrageous" word for 2009. They defined it as "a supposed committee of doctors and/or bureaucrats who would decide which patients were allowed to receive treatment, ostensibly leaving the rest to die".[3] Palin, in November 2009, said the term should not be taken literally.[4]

Origins

Betsy McCaughey

Prelude

Betsy McCaughey, a Republican political activist who has campaigned against hospital infections came to political prominence after she helped defeat the Clinton health care plan of 1993,[5][6][7] "got the ball rolling" in July and August 2009 when she called the bill "a vicious assault on elderly people" that will "cut your life short".[8] McCaughey was joined in spreading the idea by other pundits and conservative media that had helped defeat the Clinton era legislation, including The Washington Times and The American Spectator.[5][9] In a July 16 radio interview on The Fred Thompson Show, three weeks before Palin's Facebook posting, McCaughey charged that

And one of the most shocking things I found in this bill, and there were many, is on Page 425, where the Congress would make it mandatory—absolutely require—that every five years, people in Medicare have a required counseling session that will tell them how to end their life sooner, how to decline nutrition, how to decline being hydrated, how to go in to hospice care. And by the way, the bill expressly says that if you get sick somewhere in that five-year period—if you get a cancer diagnosis, for example—you have to go through that session again. All to do what’s in society’s best interest or your family’s best interest and cut your life short. These are such sacred issues of life and death. Government should have nothing to do with this.[7]

PolitiFact.com rated her statements as "Pants on Fire" on their "truth-o-meter" scale. They reported that McCaughey incorrectly stated that the bill would require Medicare patients to have counseling sessions and that the government would be trying to interfere with a very personal decision. It described her claim that the sessions would "tell [seniors] how to end their life sooner" was an outright distortion.[10]

Both McCaughey and Palin's remarks about what Palin called an alleged 'death panel' were based on opinions about Ezekiel Emanuel[11][12][13][14][15] and proposed Medicare funding for living wills.[13][14][16] According to The New York Times, McCaughey also falsely claimed that presidential advisor Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel thought that the disabled should not be entitled to medical care, which helped inspire Palin's warnings about "death panels".[17][18][19] Emanuel is in fact an opponent of legalization of doctor-assisted suicide or euthanasia.[20] FactCheck.org said, "We agree that Emanuel’s meaning is being twisted. In one article, he was talking about a philosophical trend, and in another, he was writing about how to make the most ethical choices when forced to choose which patients get organ transplants or vaccines when supplies are limited."[18][21] An article on Time.com said that Emanuel "was only addressing extreme cases like organ donation, where there is an absolute scarcity of resources ... 'My quotes were just being taken out of context.'"[22] The bill did not become law , but if it had the measure would have blocked funds for counseling that presents suicide or assisted suicide as an option. According to Congressman Earl Blumenauer who sponsored the failed bill called references to death panels or euthanasia were "mind-numbing".[23]

Representative John Boehner (Repubican-Ohio), Speaker of the House, was described by The New York Times as a leader in the spreading of unsubstantiated claims that Section 1233 would encourage euthanasia.[9][24] Along with Representative and Republican Policy Committee Chairman Thaddeus McCotter (Michigan), Boehner stated in a July 23 statement that the provision "may start us down a treacherous path toward government-encouraged euthanasia".[9][25] FactCheck.org referred to this as "a stretch" and Representative Earl Blumenauer (Democrat-Oregon) took issue with the claim.[9] On July 28, on the House floor, Representative Virginia Foxx (Republican-North Carolina) said a Republican alternative to the Democratic reform proposals was "pro-life because it will not put seniors in a position of being put to death by their government".[2][26][27] On July 30, Newt Gingrich, who has praised the Gundersen Lutheran Medical Center for its end-of-life practices, told reporters after a speech at Gunderson Lutheran that the House bill had "a bias toward euthanasia for senior citizens and other people".[28][29] Gundersen officials were dismayed after Gingrich was critical of section 1233, which Gundersen helped craft, as Gingrich was satisfied with the end-of-life care his father-in-law received there.[30]

The Washington Post noted on August 1 that

on right-leaning radio programs, religious e-mail lists and Internet blogs, the proposal has been described as 'guiding you in how to die,' 'an ORDER from the Government to end your life,' promoting 'death care' and, in the words of antiabortion leader Randall Terry, an attempt to 'kill Granny.'[25]

First use

On August 7, in her first online statement after resigning from Alaska's governorship,[31] Palin coined the term on her Facebook page[32][33] stating:

The Democrats promise that a government health care system will reduce the cost of health care, but as the economist Thomas Sowell has pointed out, government health care will not reduce the cost; it will simply refuse to pay the cost. And who will suffer the most when they ration care? The sick, the elderly, and the disabled, of course. The America I know and love is not one in which my parents or my baby with Down Syndrome will have to stand in front of Obama's 'death panel' so his bureaucrats can decide, based on a subjective judgment of their 'level of productivity in society,' whether they are worthy of health care. Such a system is downright evil.[7][34]

Spread during 2009

According to a study by Brendan Nyhan published in The Forum of Berkeley Electronic Press, during the period of July 16 through August 14, what he called the "'death panel' myth" was spread by

A BBC article interpreted conservative blogger Michelle Malkin's August comments as "explicitly re-affirming" Palin's assertion that "Obama wanted to create a 'death panel' to decide whether the elderly or disabled are 'worthy of health care'".[35] The St. Petersburg Times said Newt Gingrich's August 9 statement on This Week backed Palin.[36] He told George Stephanopoulos that "the bill's 1000 pages"[37] and it "has all sorts of panels. You're asking us to trust turning power over to the government, when there clearly are people in America who believe in establishing euthanasia, including selective standards".[38][36] Uwe Reinhardt, a health economist at Princeton, proposed that Gingrich should correct Palin, McCaughtey, and other pundids, by clarifying that the policy was far removed from 'death panels' or an intent to shorten life, as Gingrich had previously made the economic case for the expanded use of advance directives.[39]

Chuck Grassley

At an August 12 town hall meeting, Chuck Grassley, the senior Republican on the Senate Finance Committee said people

have every right to fear. You shouldn't have counseling at the end of life; you ought to have counseling 20 years before you're going to die. You ought to plan these things out. And I don't have any problem with things like living wills, but they ought to be done within the family. We should not have a government program that determines you're going to pull the plug on Grandma.[2]

At night on August 12, Palin posted to Facebook a note entitled "Concerning the 'Death Panels'" where she stood by her debunked claim and charged that "the elderly and ailing would be coerced into accepting minimal end-of-life care to reduce health care costs".[40] Palin also wrote on Facebook that it was misleading for President Obama to say the sessions were entirely voluntary; PolitiFact.com ruled that assertion false, writing that the sessions were voluntary.[41] Mostly, the death panel myth was spread by "conservative outlets on cable news, talk radio, and the internet".[7]

Legislation

Rep. Earl Blumenauer, sponsor of a similar provision[42]

When asked exactly what part of the proposed legislation[43] mandated death panels, Palin's spokesperson pointed to H.R. 3200, section 1233 Advance Care Planning Consultation.[16][41] The provision would have allowed physicians to receive payment from Medicare for voluntary counseling with patients regarding end-of-life issues so that personal preferences for care when the time comes would be known so that doctors and relatives would not have to make decisions about care on their behalf. The counseling would cover topics such as making living wills, enabling a close relative or a trusted friend to make health care decisions, hospice as an option for the terminally ill, and information about pain medications for chronic discomfort. The sessions would have been covered by Medicare every five years or more frequently for patients who became gravely ill.[42] The provision was inserted in the bill by Democratic lawmakers at the behest of La Crosse Wisconsin hospitals, including Gundersen Lutheran, that created a pioneering community program to get people who were not critically ill, to think about and choose the treatments they would want at the end of life.[44][30] Before H.R. 3200, Representative Earl Blumenauer (Democrat-Oregon) had submitted single purpose legislation in April 2009 with Republican cosponsors—Charles Boustany (Louisiana), a cardiovascular surgeon, Patrick Tiberi (Ohio), and Geoff Davis (Kentucky)—that similarly provided for Medicare payments to doctors for end-of-life counseling with patients.[45][30][46] In 1991 the Patient Self-Determination Act was enacted which required health care providers, including hospitals, hospices, and nursing homes to provide information about advance directives to admitted patients.[47][48]

Consultation payments were removed from the Senate version of the bill[49] while remaining in the House version until November 2009, when they passed, but they did not pass in the final bill.[24] On December 25, 2010, The New York Times reported that effective January 1, a new Medicare regulation had been added for consultations during annual "wellness visits," instead of at 5 year intervals as the bill originally mandated.[24] Instead, on January 4, the The New York Times reported the payments would be struck from the regulations.[50]

Uses

A death panel sign with a Nazi reference at a Rep. Carol Shea-Porter town hall meeting

Health law and bioethics expert George J. Annas wrote that "the national discussion on death planning the president had hoped for focused instead on death denial. Make believe 'death panels' that would 'pull the plug on grandma' were used as a rhetorical device to block any rational discussion of either death generally, or end of life care in particular".[51] Brent J. Pawlecki, a corporate medical director, said the phrases death panels and "killing Grandma" were "used to fuel the flames of fear and opposition".[52][53] Former Newsweek editor Jon Meacham said it was "a lie crafted to foment opposition to the president's push for reform".[54] According to The Economist, the phrase was used as an "outrageous allegation" to confront politicians at town hall meetings during the August 2009 congressional recess.[55] According to The New York Times, the term became a standard slogan among many conservatives opposed to the Obama administration’s health care overhaul.[33] Health economist Uwe Reinhardt said that it is possible to slightly bend the U.S. health care cost curve down through a lower volume of health care services "by more widespread use of living wills—an idea once actively promoted by Newt Gingrich. But those ideas were met in the past year by dark allusions to 'rationing', to Nazi-style death panels and to 'killing Granny'".[56] Reinhardt said lowering health care costs require lowering health care incomes, and those reforms always end up being a political third rail.

Rationing

Main article: Healthcare rationing in the United States

Uwe Reinhardt, a professor of economics at Princeton, after listening to President Obama being asked about how health care would be rationed under his plan wrote

"One must wonder where people worried about 'rationing' health care have been in the last 20 years. Could they possibly be unaware that the United States health system has rationed health care in spades for many years, on the economist’s definition of rationing, and that President Obama and Congress are now desperately seeking to reduce or eliminate that form of rationing?[57]

Michael F. Cannon of the Cato Institute wrote that "[p]aying doctors to help seniors sort out their preferences for end-of-life care is consumer-directed rationing, not bureaucratic rationing".[58] The Christian Science Monitor reported that some Republicans used the term as a "jumping-off point" to discuss government rationing of health care services, while some liberal groups applied the term to private health insurance companies.[59] Newt Gingrich, a Republican, said that while technically, the proposed legislation (H.R. 3200) did not provide for government rationing of health care, he alleged the legislation was "all but certain to lead to rationing".[60]

Brendan Nyhan, a health care policy analyst at the University of Michigan, wrote that although "efforts to reduce growth in health care costs under Obama’s plan might lead to more restrictive rationing than already occurs under the current health care system", Palin's statement as a whole was unjustified and false.[7] Nyhan also sees attempts to label institutions which deny "coverage at a system level for specific treatments or drugs" as attempts to move the goalposts of the debate as Palin's language required that a 'death panel' "would determine whether individual patients receive care based on their 'level of productivity in society'" which "was—and remains—false".[61]

Nyhan said that false claims with no actual basis in legislation such as the 'death panel' myth are especially insidious precisely because they cannot be addressed in the bill itself."[7]

Reactions and analysis

Health economist James C. Robinson said the "debate over so called death panels" showed how willing the public was "to believe the worst about perceived governmental interference with individual choices".[62] Historian Jill Lepore characterized 'death panels' as a reborn "conspiracy theory" that is believed by a minority of the U.S. population after Roe v. Wade and the Karen Ann Quinlan case—that the federal government is conspiring to kill off its weakest members. Of the reform effort, Lepore said it was an "unwelcome reminder of a dreaded truth: death comes to us all"; of the uproar, Lepore said it rallied a party base against death, making "for a creepy sort of populism. But if harnessing the fear of death for political gain is a grotesque tactic, it may also be a savvy one". Lepore noted that after the story spread, when Obama was left saying he was not in favor of death panels, it was an example of being "catastrophically outmaneuvered".[63] Political scientist James Morone said that despite Democrats denying the charge and focusing on the facts, the term played a role in their loss of control over the public debate because they did not address the "underlying fears of big government". Morone called the death panel arguments "pungent, memorable, simple, and effective".[64] Journalist Paul Waldman of The American Prospect, characterized the charge as a consequential policy lie, a falsehood that is not as condemned in media as an inconsequential personal lie.[65]

Gail Wilensky, a health adviser to President George H.W. Bush and John McCain who has overseen Medicare and Medicaid, said the charge was untrue and upsetting.[2][66] She said "[t]here are serious questions that are associated with policy aspects of the health care reform bills that we're seeing ... And there's frustration because so much of the discussion is around issues like the death panels and Zeke Emanuel that I think are red herrings at best".[66] Susan Dentzer, editor of Health Affairs, said Congress' approval of $1.1 billion for comparative effectiveness research in the 2009 stimulus contributed to fear the research would "lead to government rationing" which "fueled the 'death panels' fury of summer 2009".[67]

Physicians

The Ethics Committee and Taskforce on the Cost of Cancer Care of the American Society of Clinical Oncology said in a statement that the issue of funding discussions with patients had been "unfortunately politicized".

Currently, our system highly incentivizes delivery of cancer-directed interventions (chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and so on) over conversations that are critical to establishing a patient’s goals and preferences and providing individualized care. Efforts to compensate oncologists and others for delivering this important aspect of cancer care were unfortunately politicized in the recent health care reform debates, but these efforts had at their core a critical patient-centered societal interest and should be revisited.[68]

Geriatric psychiatrist Paul Kettl wrote

I wish we had death panels. I don’t mean that I’m in favor of some appointed group of erudite experts gathering to decide who lives or dies in a process controlled by the government, but rather the death panels that were originally proposed. I’m in favor of periodic discussions about advance directives that Medicare would pay for as medical visits.[69]

Kettl said his experience in a geriatric unit showed end-of-life discussions and reimbursements were "desperately needed" as these hour long conversations are "ignored in the crush of medication and disease management".[69] Kettl noted that the attention-catching phrase death panels became "a lightning rod for objections to a series of ideas about health care besides" end-of-life discussions, and that somehow, "the concept of physicians being paid for time to talk with patients and their families about advance directives ... generated into the fear of decisions about life and death being controlled by the government".[69] Kettl wrote that

Emotions and health care go together. That makes them an easy and consistent target for the media and for grandstanding commentators. We can expect more good medical ideas to be destroyed by sound bytes and needless concerns that will be exaggerated. It makes for good television, but bad medicine.[69]

Dr. Benjamin W. Corn, a cancer specialist, said the death panels controversy showed Americans were uneasy discussing topics related to the dying process and he argued that certain issues, such as whether experimental therapies should be reimbursed, the possible expansion of hospices, restoring dignity to the process of dying, and guidelines for physician assisted suicide, need to be addressed directly.[32] Dr. David Casarett, a physician who teaches palliative care at the University of Pennsylvania, responded to the 'death panels' and euthanisia charge by saying

I'm still mystified. I really can't begin to figure out where this language is coming from. It bears really no resemblance to what's in the provision of the health-care reform bill. What's in the health-care reform bill is in general, text that I think most Americans and certainly all of my patients would support.

The text of the bill really talks about giving patients and families the information they need to make the right choices. It's about giving patients an idea of what their options are. And it's giving patients and families a chance to talk about these things. So patients, families and physicians are all on the same page.

Really, these sorts of discussions are about autonomy. They're about freedom. They're about independence. They're about having a say in your own health care. They're about values that are about as American as anything else I can think of.

And so, to see this debate framing it in terms of some of the terms you mentioned before—death panels and euthanasia—is really both odd and frankly, startling to me that it's gone that far.[70][71]

Dr. Atul Gawande, a surgeon who writes about medical topics, told NPR that end of life conversations in the health reform bill "got mutated into" being described as death panels.[72] Dr. C. Porter Storey Jr. thinks the term represents "fear that there ... is not enough money to do everything for everybody and that some mechanical, governmental method will be used to determine how much of our scarce health care resources will be applied to their situation".[73]

Politicians

U.S. Senator Lisa Murkowski (Republican-Alaska) told a crowd in Anchorage in August 2009, "It does us no good to incite fear in people by saying that there's these end-of-life provisions, these death panels". She added, "There is no reason to gin up fear in the American public by saying things that are not included in the bill".[74]

In a July 2010 National Public Radio segment entitled "The Politics Of Anger", U.S. Representative Bob Inglis, (Republican-South Carolina) said, "I think it's never a good strategy to travel on misinformation. Talking about death panels when there are no death panels is a disservice to the country and, long-term, to the conservative movement."[75]

U.S. Representative Earl Blumenauer (Democrat-Oregon) thought the "'death panels' episode" showed that the news media amplified misinformation and extreme behavior instead of simply reporting the facts, contributing to the persistence of the falsehood.[76] The New York Times reported an email sent in November 2010 by Blumenauer to supporters of consultation payments for "end-of-life planning", warning them that "This regulation could be modified or reversed, especially if Republican leaders try to use this small provision to perpetuate the 'death panel' myth... We would ask that you not broadcast this accomplishment out to any of your lists, even if they are 'supporters'— e-mails can too easily be forwarded".[24]

Palin's responses

In a September 2009 speech in Hong Kong, Palin said the term was "intended to sound a warning about the rationing that is sure to follow if big government tries to simultaneously increase health care coverage while also claiming to decrease costs".[77] In November 2009 Palin said that Obama was "incorrect" and "disingenuous" when he called the death panel charge "a lie, plain and simple".[78] In the National Review she said

[t]o me, while reading that section of the bill, it became so evident that there would be a panel of bureaucrats who would decide on levels of health care, decide on those who are worthy or not worthy of receiving some government-controlled coverage ... Since health care would have to be rationed if it were promised to everyone, it would therefore lead to harm for many individuals not able to receive the government care. That leads, of course, to death.[2][4]

She explained that the term should not be taken literally, likening it to when President Ronald Reagan called the Soviet Union, the "Evil Empire".[4] "He got his point across. He got people thinking and researching what he was talking about. It was quite effective. Same thing with the 'death panels.' I would characterize them like that again, in a heartbeat", she said.[4] Media Matters stated that "Palin's claim of 'death panels' comprised of bureaucrats deciding who is 'worthy of health care' is simply false, regardless of whether she meant it literally or figuratively".[79] In October 2010, Palin defended her use of the term in a Newsmax.com interview. Palin said she

spoke a lot about the rationing of care that was going to be a part of Obamacare, and, you know, I was about laughed out of town for bringing to light what I call death panels, because there's going to be faceless bureaucrats who will—based on cost analysis and some subjective idea on somebody's level of productivity in life—somebody is going to call the shots as to whether your loved one will be able to receive health care or not. To me, death panel. I called it like I saw it, and people didn't like it.[80]

Palin used the term in a joke while speaking at the 2009 Gridiron Club dinner, saying "It is good to be here and in front of this audience of leading journalists and intellectuals. Or, as I call it, a death panel."[81][82]

Impact

Political

About a week after the coining of the term, consultation payments were removed from the Senate version of the bill by the Senate Finance Committee.[49] TIME wrote that "a single phrase—'death panels'—nearly derailed health care reform".[83] The Washington Post wrote that "President Obama's health-care initiative was nearly consumed by the furor" over the end-of-life care provision that would allow physician reimbursement for counseling.[30]

Johnathan Oberlander, a professor of health policy, said "[t]he administration ... was seemingly unprepared for the intense opposition and fury that erupted during town-hall meetings in the summer of 2009. The Democrats' focus group–tested mantra of 'quality, affordable health care' was drowned out by Republicans' false warnings of 'death panels' and a 'government takeover'".[84][85] Morone said the White House was not able to offer a "persuasive narrative to counter the Tea Party percussion", and "struggled to recapture public attention", contributing to Scott Brown's election.[64]

By mid-August 2009, the Pew Research Center reported that 86% of Americans had heard of the "death panels" charge.[7] Out of those who had heard the charge, 30% of people thought it was true while 20% did not know.[7] For Republicans, 47% thought it was true while 23% did not know.[7] In September 2010, six months after the passage of the Affordable Care Act, a BBC article stated that among the "sticky charges" that had stuck against the bill was the false charge of "government 'death panels' deciding who can get what sort of care".[86]

Professional

In the wake of the 'death panel' controversy, Atul Gawande, a physician who writes on health care topics for The New Yorker, was asked to refrain from writing about palliative care by physicians who were concerned the article might be manipulated to create another political controversy—and as a result, hurt their profession.[87][88]

Bishop et al. were fearful of how their publication on CPR/DNR would be received by the medical and bioethics communities. They were concerned because in "the era of rhetoric centered on fictional 'death panels'" their paper addressed "the quest for immortality implicit in US culture, a culture of 'life-at-all costs' that medical technology has advanced". Bishop et al. interpreted cautioning comments from their peers as a suggestion "that land mines of 'death panels' await us".[89]

Lie and word of the year

PolitiFact.com gave Palin's term its highest rating—"Pants on Fire!"—on August 10[90] and on December 19 it was named "Lie of the Year" for 2009.[2][91][92] "Death panel" was named the most outrageous word of 2009 by the American Dialect Society.[93] The definition was given as "A supposed committee of doctors and/or bureaucrats who would decide which patients were allowed to receive treatment, ostensibly leaving the rest to die".[3][93] FactCheck named the death panels falsehood as one of the "whoppers" of 2009.[94]

Post-Summer 2009 uses of term

Arizona restrictions on Medicaid coverage

When it became known in 2010 that Arizona had passed legislation restricting Medicaid recipients access to funding for life saving transplant operations, some of which had already been approved. Some in the media were quick to label the politicians denying care "a death panel" pinning the blame on the Republican governor Jan Brewer and the state's legislature.[95] The legislation was in support of a budget that had been planned before the passing of the Affordable Care Act 2010.[96] Arizona is not the only State to have cut Medicaid coverage but none other had gone so far as cutting transplant access, which are considered optional under federal law.[97]

IPAB

Main article: Independent Payment Advisory Board

While the term originally targeted a end-of-life care provision, Palin later applied the term to the IPAB.[98] After the National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform released its recommendation to strengthen the IPAB, she charged in the Wall Street Journal that the board was "'death panel'-like".[99] FactCheck.org found her characterization of the board wrong on three counts.[100] Representative Phil Roe (Republican-Tennessee), who has twice sponsored bills to eliminate the IPAB, said he would associate the term with the IPAB.[98] Roe was described by the The Washington Post as "a kindred soul by the medical industry" in part for his legislative efforts against the IPAB and a "magnet during the last election for more than $90,000 in contributions from medical professionals from across the country".[101][102]

Other mentions

In October 2010, The Philadelphia Inquirer highlighted the term in its "The Week in Words" article[103] after Barney Frank said the only death panels created by congressional Democrats were for troubled financial institutions under the authority of the Dodd–Frank Bill.[104]

In November 2010, Paul Krugman said that no death panels would be needed to control Medicare and Medicaid costs "through consideration of medical effectiveness and, at some point, how much we’re willing to spend for extreme care".[105]

Examples with similarities

When dialysis, a medical technology that performs the critical function of the kidney, was a new and expensive treatment in the U.S., most private insurers would not pay for the service.[106] At one U.S. hospital, before the treatment was guaranteed through Medicare, a community—not government—panel, rationed the new technology based on several factors, one being perceived social worth.[106] Doctors did not want to make the decisions as to which patients got the life-saving treatment, so community members made the decisions.[107] ProPublica referred to the panel as a death panel, which was dubbed a "God Committee" by contemporaries.[106] The hospital's panel, at Scribner's medical center, "sparked one of the earliest national debates over the right to care and put pressure on the government to step in."[106]

A Foreign Policy article compared what they said was Palin's false death panel charge to three global health care policies. They each received a "death panel factor", or a score out of 100. Physician-assisted suicide programs in Switzerland, Luxembourg, Belgium, the Netherlands, and the U.S. state of Oregon garnered a 30. The Texas Futile Care Law received a 25. It "gives patients the right to dictate the kind of end-of-life care they would like to receive. But the law contains a provision allowing a hospital committee to arbitrate disputes between families and physicians. The boards can end life support for patients if the care is determined to be 'futile'".[108] Britain's NICE, "which sets standards for its National Health Service by evaluating medications and approving those found to be cost-effective" received a rating of 15. "Patients seeking care not paid for by the government are left with the choice of paying out-of-pocket or foregoing the treatment (as in the United States, if an insurer refuses a claim)".[108]Additional private insurance can be purchased to pay for cancer drugs not covered by the NHS.[109] Private health care providers and private insurance is available as an alternative to the NHS.

See also

References

  1. ^ Ezra Klein (August 10, 2009). "Is the Government Going to Euthanize your Grandmother? An Interview With Sen. Johnny Isakson". The Washington Post. Retrieved 12 November 2010.
  2. ^ a b c d e f "PolitiFact's Lie of the Year: 'Death panels'". Politifact.com. December 19, 2009. Retrieved November 19, 2010.
  3. ^ a b "'Tweet' 2009 Word of the Year, 'Google' Word of the Decade, as voted by American Dialect Society" (PDF). American Dialect Society. January 8, 2010. Retrieved October 8, 2010.
  4. ^ a b c d Lowry, Rich (November 17, 2009). "The Rogue, on the Record". National Review.
  5. ^ a b Jim Rutenberg and Jackie Calmes (August 13, 2010). "False 'Death Panel' Rumor Has Some Familiar Roots". The New York Times.
  6. ^ Dwyer, Jim (August 25, 2009). "Distortions on Health Bill, Homegrown". The New York Times. Retrieved 21 November 2010.
  7. ^ a b c d e f g h i j Brendan Nyhan (2010). "Why the "Death Panel" Myth Wouldn't Die: Misinformation in the Health Care Reform Debate" (PDF). The Forum. 8 (1). Berkeley Electronic Press. doi:10.2202/1540-8884.1354.
  8. ^ David Saltonstall (August 13, 2009). "Ex-pol goes for the jugular. Former Lt. Gov. McCaughey leads 'death panel' charge". New York Daily News. p. 5.
  9. ^ a b c d Jess Henig, with Lori Robertson (July 29, 2010). "False Euthanasia Claims". FactCheck.org.
  10. ^ McCaughey claims end-of-life counseling will be required for Medicare patients Politifact.com, July 23rd, 2009
  11. ^ New York Post, Betsy McCaughey, Deadly Doctors
  12. ^ Palin, Sarah (August 7, 2009). "Statement on the Current Health Care Debate". Facebook. Retrieved 2009-08-25.
  13. ^ a b Palin, Sarah (August 12, 2009). "Concerning the "Death Panels"". Facebook. Retrieved 2009-08-25.
  14. ^ a b Sarah Palin, September 8, 2009, Facebook, Written Testimony Submitted to the New York State Senate Aging Committee
  15. ^ The Atlantic, Marc Ambinder, August 11, 2009, Zeke Emanuel, The Death Panels, And Illogic In Politics
  16. ^ a b Tapper, Jake (August 7, 2009). "Palin Paints Picture of 'Obama Death Panel' Giving Thumbs Down to Trig". abcnews.com. ABC News. Archived from the original on February 5, 2011. Retrieved 21 November 2010.
  17. ^ Jim Rutenberg (September 4, 2009). "Resurfacing, a Critic Stirs Up Debate Over Health Care". The New York Times.
  18. ^ a b FactCheck.org, ‘Deadly Doctor’?
  19. ^ The new York Times, August 25, 2009, Distortions on Health Bill, Homegrown
  20. ^ Ezekiel Emanuel, March 1997, The Atlantic, Who's Right to Die?
  21. ^ FactCheck.org, False Euthanasia Claims
  22. ^ Michael Scherer, TIME, August 12, 2009, Ezekiel Emanuel, Obama's 'Deadly Doctor,' Strikes Back, Ezekiel Emanuel, Obama's 'Deadly Doctor,' Strikes Back
  23. ^ Matthew Daly, August 14, 2009, The Chicago Tribune, AP story, Palin stands by 'death panel claim
  24. ^ a b c d Robert Pear (December 25, 2010). "Obama Returns to End-of-Life Plan That Caused Stir". The New York Times.
  25. ^ a b Ceci Connolly (August 1, 2009). "Talk Radio Campaign Frightening Seniors; Provision for End-of-Life Counseling Is Described by Right as 'Death Care'". The Washington Post. p. A.1.
  26. ^ Kim Underwood and Richard Craver (August 13, 2009). "Advance-directives section fueling concern and, officials say, misunderstanding". McClatchy - Tribune Business News.
  27. ^ Tim Dickinson (October 1, 2009). "The Lie Machine". Rolling Stone (1088): 45–9.
  28. ^ Richard Mial (August 13, 2009). "La Crosse Tribune, Wis., Richard Mial column: Richard Mial: A momentary lapse in necessary skepticism". McClatchy - Tribune Business News.
  29. ^ Newt Gingrich (July 2, 2009). "Health Care Rx: Across the Country, Some Systems Are Getting It Right". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on February 5, 2011.
  30. ^ a b c d Alec MacGillis (4 September 2009). "In Wisconsin, A Pioneering Program; The Unwitting Birthplace of the 'Death Panel' Myth". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on February 18, 2011.
  31. ^ Ian Urbina (August 8, 2009). "Angry protesters disrupt forums about health care across nation". The Virginian-Pilot. p. A.7.
  32. ^ a b Corn BW (2009). "Ending end-of-life phobia — a prescription for enlightened health care reform". N. Engl. J. Med. 361 (27): e63. doi:10.1056/NEJMp0909740. PMID 20018960. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  33. ^ a b Mark Leibovich (September 12, 2010). "The Wish for a Conservative Dream Duo". The New York Times.
  34. ^ "Death panel, end-of-life become hot topics in U.S. health care reform debate". Xinhua News Agency. August 13, 2009.
  35. ^ "Bloggers debate British healthcare". BBC News. 12 August 2009. Retrieved 15 October 2010.
  36. ^ a b Angie Drobnic Holan (August 11, 2009). "No 'death panel' in health care bill: Sarah Palin says Obama's health reform lets bureaucrats decide who gets care. Not so". St. Petersburg Times.
  37. ^ "Death Panels". The Colbert Report. Comedy Central. August 10, 2009. Retrieved February 5, 2011.
  38. ^ Howard Kurtz (August 24, 2009). "Journalists, Left Out of The Debate; Few Americans Seem to Hear Health Care Facts". The Washington Post. p. C.1.
  39. ^ Uwe Reinhardt (August 17, 2009). "End-of-Life Care: Addendum". The New York Times. Retrieved February 22, 2011.
  40. ^ "Palin stands by 'death panel' claim". USA Today. Associated Press. August 8, 2009. Archived from the original on February 8, 2011. Retrieved February 8, 2010.
  41. ^ a b Robert Farley (August 13, 2009). "Palin claims Obama misled when he said end-of-life counseling is voluntary". St. Petersburg Times.
  42. ^ a b Kim Underwood, Richard Craver (August 13, 2009). "Seeing through the myths of a health-care overhaul". Winston-Salem Journal. Associated Press. p. A.1.
  43. ^ America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009 (PDF) Library of Congress. Retrieved 19 November 2010.
  44. ^ "Intrepid Reporter Faces, Survives 'Death Panel'". NPR's Heath Blogs. National Public Radio. November 16, 2010. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |name= ignored (help)
  45. ^ Kathy Keily and Mimi Hall (August 18, 2009). "End-of-life counseling started with bipartisan support". USA Today. p. A.4.
  46. ^ Michelle Goldberg (August 4, 2009). "The Health-Care Lie Machine". The Daily Beast. Retrieved December 28, 2010.
  47. ^ Clinton Thomas (August 30, 2009). "Four small words, so much controversy". St. Joseph News-Press.
  48. ^ Catherine Godbey (August 30, 2009). "Death panels or end-of-life care? Hospice of the Valley weighs in on issue". The Decatur Daily. Retrieved February 18, 2011.
  49. ^ a b "Senate committee scraps healthcare provision that gave rise to 'death panel' claims; Though the claims are widely discredited, the Senate Finance Committee is withdrawing from its bill the inclusion of advance care planning consultations, calling them too confusing". Los Angeles Times. August 14, 2009. {{cite news}}: Cite uses deprecated parameter |authors= (help)
  50. ^ Robert Pear (January 4, 2011). "U.S. Alters Rule on Paying for End-of-Life Planning". The New York Times.
  51. ^ George J. Annas (2010). Worst case bioethics: death, disaster, and public health. Oxford University Press. p. 14. ISBN 019539173X.
  52. ^ J. Brent Pawlecki (2010). "End of life: a workplace issue". Health Aff (Millwood). 29 (1): 141–6. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0481. PMID 20048373.
  53. ^ "Insight Forums: Dr. Brent J. Pawlecki". Retrieved October 20, 2010.
  54. ^ Jon Meacham (September 12, 2009). "I Was a Teenage Death Panelist". Newsweek. 154 (12): 8.
  55. ^ "United States: Friend or foe?; The politics of health reform". The Economist. 392 (8644): 24. August 15, 2009.
  56. ^ Uwe Reinhardt (September 24, 2010). "The Perennial Quest to Lower Health Care Spending". The New York Times. Archived from the original on February 6, 2011. Retrieved February 6, 2011.
  57. ^ Reinhardt, Uwe E. (July 3, 2009). "'Rationing' Health Care: What Does It Mean?". The New York Times.
  58. ^ Michael F. Cannon (August 19, 2009). "Sorry Folks, Sarah Palin Is (Partly) Right". The Detroit Free Press. reprinted by the Cato Institute. Retrieved December 7, 2010.
  59. ^ Peter Grier (August 21, 2009). "'Death panel' controversy remains very much alive; Even some conservatives call the issue bogus. Meanwhile, the healthcare debate shifts to 'rationing.'". Christian Science Monitor.
  60. ^ Newt Gingrich (August 16, 2009). "Healthcare rationing: Real scary; Concerns about government bureaucracies gaining oversight of your treatment are not misplaced. We need reforms, but the answer is not central planning". Los Angeles Times.
  61. ^ Brendan Nyhan. Continuing efforts to justify false "death panels" claim August 17, 2010. Accessed January 15, 2011.
  62. ^ Robinson JC (2010). "Comparative effectiveness research: from clinical information to economic incentives". Health Aff (Millwood). 29 (10): 1788–95. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0605. PMID 20921477. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  63. ^ Jill Lepore (November 30, 2009). "The Politics of Death". The New Yorker. 85 (39): 60–7.
  64. ^ a b James A. Morone (2010). "Presidents and health reform: from Franklin D. Roosevelt to Barack Obama". Health Aff (Millwood). 29 (6): 1096–100. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0420. PMID 20530336. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  65. ^ "Political Lies and the Press". On the Media. October 15, 2010. NPR. WNYC.
  66. ^ a b Jim Rutenberg, Gardiner Harris (September 2, 2009). "Conservatives See Need for Serious Health Debate". The New York Times.
  67. ^ Susan Dentzer (2010). "Comparative Effectiveness: Coherent Health Care At Last?". Health Aff (Millwood). 29 (10): 1756. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0900. PMID 20921471. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  68. ^ Peppercorn JM, Smith TJ, Helft PR; et al. (2011). "American Society of Clinical Oncology Statement: Toward Individualized Care for Patients With Advanced Cancer". J Clin Oncol. doi:10.1200/JCO.2010.33.1744. PMID 21263086. {{cite journal}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |author= (help); Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  69. ^ a b c d Kettl P (2010). "One Vote for Death Panels". JAMA. 303 (13): 1234–5. doi:10.1001/jama.2010.376. PMID 20371773. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  70. ^ "Doctor On End-Of-Life Care" (Interview). All Things Considered. August 18, 2009. NPR.
  71. ^ David Jonathan Casarett: Description of Bioethics Expertise University of Pennsylvania Center of Bioethics. Retrieved November 19, 2010.
  72. ^ "Dr. Atul Gawande: Make End Of Life More Humane" (Interview). Fresh Air. NPR. July, 29 2010. Retrieved November 19, 2010. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  73. ^ Meier DE, Casarett DJ, von Gunten CF, Smith WJ, Storey CP (2010). "Palliative medicine: politics and policy" (PDF). J Palliat Med. 13 (2): 141–6. doi:10.1089/jpm.2010.9852. PMID 20043709. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  74. ^ Lisa Demer (August 12, 2009). "Murkowski: Don't tell lies about health bill; Some things in the legislation are already bad enough, she says at civic center". Anchorage Daily News. p. A.1.
  75. ^ "The Politics Of Anger". NPR. July 18, 2010.
  76. ^ Earl Blumenauer (November 14, 2009). "My Near Death Panel Experience". The New York Times.
  77. ^ Alex Frangos and Tatiana Lau (September 23, 2009). "Excerpts of Sarah Palin's Speech to Investors in Hong Kong". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved December 16, 2010.
  78. ^ Goldberg, Alan B.; Thomson, Katie N. (November 16, 2009). "Sarah Palin: I Want to Play a Major Role in National Politics, 'If People Will Have Me' Former Alaska Gov. Tells Barbara Walters President Obama is "Incorrect" and "Disingenuous" on "Death Panels"". ABC News. Retrieved December 20, 2009.
  79. ^ Eric Schroeck Taranto Offers Up Weak Defense Of Palin's "Death Panel" Lie Media Matters February 3, 2011.
  80. ^ Chris Good (October 12, 2010). "Sarah Palin Is Back on the Death Panels". The Atlantic. Retrieved November 21, 2010.
  81. ^ Van Susteren, Greta (December 6, 2009). "GOV PALIN: "GOING FUNNY" (ROGUE?)". Fox News. Retrieved December 14, 2010.
  82. ^ Andrew Clark (December 6, 2009). "It's the way she tells them: Sarah Palin jokes with journalists". The Guardian. London. Retrieved October 15, 2010.
  83. ^ Michael Scherer (March 4, 2010). "The White House Scrambles to Tame the News Cyclone". TIME. Retrieved November 21, 2010.
  84. ^ Jonathan Oberlander (2010). "Long time coming: why health reform finally passed". Health Aff (Millwood). 29 (6): 1112–6. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0447. PMID 20530339. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  85. ^ "Jonathan Oberlander — Dept. of Social Medicine". University of North Carolina School of Medicine. Retrieved November 4, 2010.
  86. ^ Katie Connolly (September 22, 2010). "Why healthcare reform has been a tough sell". BBC News. Retrieved November 24, 2010.
  87. ^ Atul Gawande (August 2, 2010). "Letting Go: What should medicine do when it can't save your life?". The New Yorker.
  88. ^ "New Studies in Palliative Care". The Diane Rehm Show. August 24, 2010. 21 minutes in. NPR. {{cite episode}}: Unknown parameter |serieslink= ignored (|series-link= suggested) (help)
  89. ^ Bishop JP, Brothers KB, Perry JE, Ahmad A (2010). "Finite knowledge/finite power: 'death panels' and the limits of medicine". Am J Bioeth. 10 (1): W7–9. doi:10.1080/15265160903493070. PMID 20077324. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  90. ^ "Sarah Palin falsely claims Barack Obama runs a 'death panel'". PolitiFact.com. August 10, 2009. Retrieved November 19, 2010.
  91. ^ Susan Davis (December 22, 2009). "Palin's 'Death Panels' Charge Named 'Lie of the Year'". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved August 5, 2010.
  92. ^ "The Year In Lies". All Things Considered. NPR. December 18, 2009. Retrieved November 19, 2010.
  93. ^ a b Charles E. Carson (2010). "Among the new words". American Speech. 85 (3). American Dialect Society: 352–65. doi:10.1215/00031283-2010-020.
  94. ^ FactCheck.org (December 30, 2009). "The Whoppers of 2009". The York Dispatch.
  95. ^ Partial transcript of "Countdown with Keith Olbermann" November 19th, 2010
  96. ^ Yes, Gov. Brewer, Arizona does have a death panel Arizona Republic December 9, 2010
  97. ^ Lacey, Marc (December 2, 2010). "Arizona Cuts Financing for Transplant Patients". The New York Times.
  98. ^ a b Suzy Khimm (January 27, 2011). "It's Alive! GOPers Resurrect 'Death Panels'". Mother Jones. Retrieved February 8, 2011.
  99. ^ Palin, Sarah, Why I Support the Ryan Roadmap, Wall Street Journal, December 10, 2010.
  100. ^ Eugene Kiely, Dangelo Gore and Viveca Novak (December 23, 2010). "Let the distortions begin; A sneak preview of what to expect as 2012 comes into focus". FactCheck.org. Retrieved January 13, 2011.
  101. ^ R. Jeffery Smith Health-related money continues to flow to members of Congress The Washington Post. February 6, 2011.
  102. ^ Dr. Roe Introduces Legislation to Eliminate the Independent Payment Advisory Board: HR 452 – The Medicare Decisions Accountability Act Press Release. January 26, 2011.
  103. ^ "The Week in Words: Death panels; muddling along; happy to retire at 60". The Philadelphia Inquirer. October 31, 2010. Retrieved November 4, 2010.
  104. ^ Christopher Condon (October 25, 2010). "Frank Says 'Death Panels' Await Failing Banks Under Law Bearing His Name". Bloomberg. Retrieved November 4, 2010.
  105. ^ Paul Krugman (November 17, 2010). "Death Panels and Sales Taxes". The New York Times.
  106. ^ a b c d Robin Fields (November 9, 2010). "In Dialysis, Life-Saving Care at Great Risk and Cost". ProPublica. Retrieved January 13, 2011.
  107. ^ Dialysis: An Experiment In Universal Health Care Fresh Air (NPR). November 9, 2010.
  108. ^ a b Aditi Nangia and Michael Wilkerson, "Foreign Policy: The Truth About Death Panels", NPR, September 10, 2009.
  109. ^ Simon, Emma (November 4, 2008). "Victory for cancer patients as NHS ban on 'top-up' drugs is lifted". The Daily Telegraph. London.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Death_panel&oldid=417485029"