User talk:Stevenknowsyoda54

This user has black hair.

Troublemaker

This user has loves vandalism.

This user is an American-Born Persian.

July 2011

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User:SummerPhD. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 19:56, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at User:SummerPhD, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Cut it out! This is not kindergarten. Favonian (talk) 20:15, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've updated the counter, thats all!!!! By the looks of it, you appear to kindergarden. It says specifically to update the counter when you vandalize the page.

OK, I've unblocked you. Now find something useful to do or you'll be blocked again. Favonian (talk) 20:55, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Nelly, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 02:34, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 15:39, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

response

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Stevenknowsyoda54 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Ok, you dont have to unblock before the time expires, But let me ask you this, I'd like multiple opinions, Do you think that was kinda or even extremely funny??? Stevenknowsyoda54 (talk) 15:51, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No. Closedmouth (talk) 15:56, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Does anybody think that [edit] is funny???

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Stevenknowsyoda54 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Does anybody think that [edit] is funny???, if you do, comment under this request for unblocking or 1 person can comment in the review and the rest will comment under it Stevenknowsyoda54 (talk) 03:48, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

No, its not funny Jac16888 ^Talk 04:05, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

profiterole

I am undoing your move. You seem to believe "cream puff" is the most widely used name. I see no indication of this. Rather, it seems your belief hinges on the term that you are familiar with(the current term in the U.S.). You are apparently incorrect about the rest of the world, as the article and cite sources indicates. Please discuss the issue on the article talk page first. Thanks. - SummerPhD (talk) 17:39, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

--John (talk) 16:35, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Stevenknowsyoda54 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

ME!!!!!! WHAT DID I DOO!????!!!!!Stevenknowsyoda54 (talk) 01:23, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=ME!!!!!! WHAT DID I DOO!????!!!!![[User:Stevenknowsyoda54|Stevenknowsyoda54]] ([[User talk:Stevenknowsyoda54#top|talk]]) 01:23, 31 July 2011 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=ME!!!!!! WHAT DID I DOO!????!!!!![[User:Stevenknowsyoda54|Stevenknowsyoda54]] ([[User talk:Stevenknowsyoda54#top|talk]]) 01:23, 31 July 2011 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=ME!!!!!! WHAT DID I DOO!????!!!!![[User:Stevenknowsyoda54|Stevenknowsyoda54]] ([[User talk:Stevenknowsyoda54#top|talk]]) 01:23, 31 July 2011 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}