User talk:Tournesol

Welcome to the Wikipedia

Here are some links I thought useful:

Feel free to contact me personally with any questions you might have. Wikipedia:About, Wikipedia:Help desk, and Wikipedia:Village pump are also a place to go for answers to general questions. You can sign your name by typing 4 tildes, like this: ~~~~.

Be Bold!

Sam Spade (talk · contribs) 01:09, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Thanks, I'm fairly used to Wikipedia, but I don't write very much in English, partly because my native language is Swedish and it takes me bloody forever to write in correct English, partly because I find the size of en. a bit overwhelming. Swedish Wikipedia only gets some 3000 contributions (as in edits, not brand new pages) per day and has say forty regulars, so it's more of a "virtual village pub".

Best regards,

Tournesol 11:59, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for the notes on être and éteindre, I did not read the sentence carefully.

Jon Cates

Help with Translation!?

Can you help translate this for me to swedish? Many thanks in advance!

About half of the economically active population is employed in agriculture. Arable land amounts to only one-fourth of the total land area, yet the country meets nearly all its food needs from domestic production. In the mid-1970s, moreover, Albania became selfsufficient in bread grains. Main crops are wheat, corn (maize), sugar beets, cotton, sunflower seeds, tobacco, potatoes, and fruits. Major livestock are sheep, goats, cattle, and pigs.

--Armour 14:12, 22 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, here you go:

Omkring hälften av den yrkesverksamma befolkningen arbetar inom jordbruket. Odlingsbart land utgör blott en fjärdedel av den totala arealen, men trots detta är landet nästintill självförsörjande vad gäller livsmedel. I mitten av 1970-talet blev dessutom Albanien självförsörjande vad beträffar spannmål. De viktigaste grödorna är vete, majs, sockerbetor, bomull, solrosfrön, tobak, potatis och frukt. De viktigaste boskapssorterna är får, getter, nötkreatur och svin.

Best regards,

Tournesol 21:51, 22 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh, it's the Professor Calculus from Sioux Falls, Canada! 68.39.174.238 06:36, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ohoj

Hej Tournesol det är jag Kabom nu är det 12 dagar kvar innan blockeringen av mitt användarkonto upphör tja mitt oinloggade konto släpper 4 dagar efter men går det bra om jag återgår till att redigera 26 oktober? men om ni vill att jag väntar 4 dagar till kan jag leva med det men jag uppskatta att ni ej förlänger blockeringen jag har också lyssnat på Beros varning jag fick på min diskussionssida. Och förresten räknas långyxa som ett sorts stånvapen? det ser ut så enligt bildresultat jag sett. Vad har du och säga?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.67.255.155 (talk • contribs) 16:12, 15 November 2007

Nu får du ta och lyssna!

Jag har ju bett er alla om ursäkt och lärt mig min du tror mig inte och alla gör misstag altt var inte som ni trodde jag kanske klantade mig för några veckor sedan så ni gjorde en höna av en liten fjäder jag har bättrat mig ni måste tro mig jag kan bevisa det om du avblockerar mig. Om du nu förlänger blockeringen av mig nu så varsågod men då blir det du som förlorar på det hela. En månad var lite väl hårt det var ju bara ett litet bråk just sådan blockering borde bara vara egentligen 2-3 veckor så vem är det då som är barnunge här? Jag har lärt mig min läxa men när jag kommer tillbaka kan jag klanta till det ibland och det gör alla. Nu är jag lite irriterad jag vill inte vara elak men nu kämpar jag för min rätt. Det känns som ni behandlar mig som luft. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.67.255.155 (talk) 14:15, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vilken ironi, just "nu får du ta och lyssna" var i allt väsentligt vad många sade flera gånger till dig innan du blockerades. - Tournesol (talk) 13:22, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Messages from blocked Swedish vandal

Note to non-Swedes: I'm an administrator at Swedish Wikipedia. Earlier today, I blocked an IP address who had previously been blocked twice for vandalism in the last month, once by me and once by an other administrator. Since the user responded with a four-letter profanity to my block today, I also write-protected the user's (Swedish) talk page. Unable to continue his vandalism in SVWP, the user has now come to ENWP to harass me further, including the Gestapo reference which should be quite obvious even if you don't read Swedish. - Tournesol (talk) 13:22, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Känner Du Dig tuff nu?

OK - jag gjorde fel och har erkänt detta men samtidigt undrar jag om Du känner Dig tuff nu när Du har blockerat mig? Inte heller direkt första gången som Du får kritik för Din "administration" på Wikipedia - se gärna diskussionen med Johanna Senapsfrö.

Du har i mitt tycke en väldigt tråkig, nedlåtande och överspänd attityd. Ungefär som, ja...vad hette de nu igen? Just det: GESTAPO. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.67.88.218 (talk) 12:54, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Översittare

Det finns bara ett ord för såna som Dig: Översittare. Ha det kul i Ditt torftiga som enbart tycks existera på Wikipedia. Men Du sitter väl hemma i en sunkig lägenhet utan några vänner. Sopa. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.67.88.218 (talk) 13:18, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ut ur Wikipedia!

UT MED DIG ÖVERSITTARE!

UT UR WIKIPEDIA!

Ingen Gestapo på Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.67.88.218 (talk) 13:22, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blokerad p.g.a. klotter från att skapa konto.

Hej

Jag eller iaf mitt IP-nummer har blivit blockerat av dig p.g.a. klotter. Kan du vänligen upplysa mig om vari detta klotter bestod samt när blockeringen hävs. Har främst ägnat mig åt att bidra till engelska Wiki men önskar skapa ett svenskt konto också. Vilket jag av för mig okänd anledning nu inte kan (jag kan inte se historik på sådant jag redigerat som icke-inloggad). Om du behöver IP-adress för att kunna svara på detta vänligen upplys mig om hur jag kan delge dig den utan att skriva ut den publikt.

Jag kan som sagt inte bedöma på vilka grunder du bestämde att det var klotter, det vore intressant att få reda på detta för att undvika sådant i framtiden.

Hej,

Om du inte vet vilken adress det är som blivit blockerad och inte vet när blockeringen lades är det svårt för mig att göra något konkret - jag har blockerat hundratals icke-inloggade det senaste halvåret och kan inte gärna avblockera alla för att lösa ett fall. Det enklaste är förmodligen att du skapar ett konto från någon annan dator (som inte är blockerad) för då bör det sedan gå att logga in med det kontot även från den blockerade datorn. Ett alternativ vore att du använde funktionen "E-mail this user" i rutan toolbox till vänster och skickar din IP-adress till mig.

- Tournesol (talk) 05:04, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Explain

Perhaps you would like to explain this edit and this one. You should also explain why you chose to undo my edit without justification or notice. —Dark 05:25, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You mean reverting these exits?

06:49, 19 October 2009 (hist | diff) Gian Biagio Conte ‎ (really?)

06:40, 19 October 2009 (hist | diff) Fredrik Gertten ‎ (no shit.)

Perhaps I was mistaken, but I thought the "men" category was used for being able to search articles and get articles statistics, and your edit messages really? and no shit didn't help much. - Tournesol (talk) 06:18, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"This is a category for concepts related to men and masculinity, not for individual men." as quoted from Category:Men. If you were to add every man on the category...well, it wouldn't work. You can probably tell that I am not a fan of overcat, and I thought the intentions of my edit was obvious. —Dark 07:58, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I would request that you revert the articles back to my revision, unless you have any objections? Thanks. —Dark 10:25, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thanks for explaining the part I had misunderstood. - Tournesol (talk) 15:55, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your name is ... from Tintin?

You don't say on your page ... is your name taken from the Tintin character? Regards, Piano non troppo (talk) 01:19, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't quite remember how I came to pick that user name, but I was living in France when I created my account (some five or six years ago) and I vaguely remember reading the word tournesol (which just means sunflower in French) on something, possibly a bottle of sunflower cooking oil in the kitchen or some sort of crackers or snack bar with sunflower seeds. I did know that it was also the name for the professor in Tintin, but that was more of a side-effect. - Tournesol (talk) 16:27, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Tournesol! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 500 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Georg Riedel - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Nikolay Brusentsov - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 23:49, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Small Axe

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Small Axe. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Burnin' (The Wailers album). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Burnin' (The Wailers album) - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Thanks, TTGL | Talk to me! 19:41, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for notifying me, I clicked "Save page" a bit early when I only wanted to preview the page. I think the song has been covered by enough other artists to be notable, but let's keep that to the article talk page. - Tournesol (talk) 20:01, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Tournesol!

You may recognise my name, but don't block me. You recently blocked the Swedish account of Fågelfors-Glen, which was for the better, really that account should be deleted. You see, the Fågelfors-Glen of swedish Wikipedia is a totally free login name, everybody can use it. Due to this the user Fågelfors-Glen in swedish is a total con. Please contact me as soon aspossible so we can discuss the matter // --Fågelfors-Glen (talk) 11:04, 17 February 2010 (UTC) P.S Leave a message here User talk: Fågelfors-Glen [reply]

I don't have the possibility to delete accounts at SVWP, but I suppose the bureaucrats there could, or at least re-name the account to some random string. But what do you mean by the Fågelfors-Glen of swedish Wikipedia is a totally free login name, everybody can use it? Doesn't the account have a password? Or did you let a computer remember the password so that anybody using that computer can access the account? - Tournesol (talk) 11:09, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the case: the school uses something called "clients". These then connect to the school server, where it can be used as a computer. They thereby save the password for everybody, since we're all at the same IP. / / Fågelfors-Glen (talk) 12:56, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion pages and archiving on enwp

Hi Tournesol

Since you've asked Björn Bergman a few times to not delete old message but archiving them instead I would just like to point out that this is wikipedia in English not Swedish and the rules about these things are different. Here a user can delete the contents (after a reasonable ammount of time) instead of moving them into an archive if he/she so chooses. GameOn (talk) 07:11, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, if Björn removes any more messages (after a reasonable amount of time) I will bear this in mind. - Tournesol (talk) 08:54, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SJ AB

Hello, Tournesol! You did a little mistake, when I wrote an information about that SJ AB's headquarters are in Stockholm, you undid my edits. The headquarters are in Stockholm, you can look here. BjörnBergman 12:53, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing this out, I didn't realize the "location" argument was displayed as "Headquarter location" in the template. - Tournesol (talk) 11:33, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Olof Palme

Hi, Tournesol! You did a mistake. You undid my edits in Olof Palme when I changed his death date. He died on 28 February, not on 1 March, look here. BjörnBergman 18:54, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but it appears you are wrong. He was pronounced dead six minutes past midnight, i.e. on March 1, you can read all about it in the SVWP article, although Wikipedia isn't a very good source in Wikipedia articles. - Tournesol (talk) 17:09, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Juan SaltSinker

Only blocked on en because of my block. I don't know if it is possible to do a system wide block. meta would be the place for this I suspect. [1] can list the url for a system wide spam stop. The COIBOT has already reported at that place. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:12, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have found it at meta:Steward requests/Global#Requests for global (un)lock and (un)hiding. http://toolserver.org/~luxo/contributions/contributions.php?user=Juan+SaltSinker&lang= gives all contributions. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:26, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, evidetly it wasn't as bad as I feared when I had checked the contributions from this account in four languages (Swedish, English, French and Spanish) and found spam in every single one of them. I thought he had been spamming if not all then at least tens of language versions of Wikipedia. - Tournesol (talk) 05:44, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock me now

I am being really, really serious now. Please unblock me now (Heymid) on the Swedish Wikipedia! My block has even spread over on Oskar Trollunge (alias "Alasdair") blog at http://hogerwiki.blogspot.com/. You can read his blog post there on Saturday, May 29 2010, the day I got blocked from Swedish Wikipedia. You can read it shortly here. That blog post proves that he really wanted me to become blocked. He even states that I am a sockpuppet ("marionett" on Swedish) to Mannen av börd, Loka Lök and Perolinka!

Sockpuppet? That is not true. You can easily confirm this, by requesting an IP-koll/look. I don't even have the same IP adress (and maybe not even the same IP range) as those accounts and adresses. Do you know Alasdair's real username on the Swedish Wikipedia? Could you contact him and say that he should not be blogging like that about me, although I don't know if anyone actually visits the blog, since if public users and people have either discovered the blog site or not yet.

A whole bunch of people have also called me a troll! You can check out WP:KAW on Swedish Wikipedia for proof. And, as I said earlier, none of these theories/rumours are true. Heymid (talk) 16:35, 31 May 2010 (UTC) [reply]

Also, I have always been a constructive user on Swedish Wikipedia. Everyone thinks and believes that I am a sock puppet and a troll, but that is not true. It is false. So please unblock me and give me a final chance, because everyone has misunderstood me, totally!

~~Also, check out my contributions at English Wikipedia. They are all (most of them, at least) constructive.~~

And finally, I think that the blogger (Oskar Trollunge, also called "Alasdair") should also be permanently blocked from editing on Swedish Wikipedia, if he is acting like that against a constructive user and person. Such kind of behaviors outside Wikipedia is definitely against the rules for Wikipedia, outside Wikipedia. Heymid (talk) 16:39, 31 May 2010 (UTC) [reply]

~~Forget it. Goodbye. - Tournesol (talk) 19:42, 31 May 2010 (UTC)~~[reply]

Private information + other things

1. See User talk:HJ Mitchell#Request at SVWP. You mentioned "Asperger's syndrome". You are absolutely correct. I am actually suffering from that. It is not as easy to live with that (it's hard to explain in English). I also believe that BB has a similiar diagnose, maybe like AS (that I have) or maybe ADHD (remember, I am just speculating at the moment). Know, what I am wondering, is: Where have I mentioned "Asperger's syndrome", or have you managed to figure it out or is it just speculation?

~~2. See my latest reply at User_talk:HJ Mitchell#Request at SVWP.~~

3. I chose to contact HJ Mitchell, because I searched around the "administrators" group and found him to be a reliable and active administrator, and has blocked users and IP-adresses many times (see his log for blocking). That's why I chose him.

4. Could you launch a new separate investigation on SV:WP:KAW and come to a definite decision, regarding my block, if it either will be time limited (bad at English due to young age) or still permanent? Also, it maybe would be better if you keep the whole investigation at a separate page of it's own, like "SV:WP:Kommentarer av administreringen av Wikipedia/Heymid"?

~~5. Finally, I will come with more information on Swedish Wikipedia regarding my block later this week. Heymid (talk) 20:06, 14 June 2010 (UTC)~~ [reply]

~~Forget it. Goodbye. - Tournesol (talk) 06:05, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]~~

~~Are you a troll? Heymid (talk) 10:11, 15 June 2010 (UTC)~~[reply]

ACN & Direct Selling News

I respectfully disagree with your statement regarding your recent edits to the ACN article that "this "Direct Selling News" magazine doesn't appear to be very noteworthy."

Direct Selling News is the foremost authority on the direct sales/network marketing industry. Companies profiled or featured in the publication regularly point to it as a mark of credibility, and the magazine is held in incredibly high esteem. Recently featured companies include companies such as Nu Skin, Primerica, and Herbalife. Inclusion in the Global 100 is the direct sales-specific equivalent of the Inc. 500. Just because its circulation may be relatively small compared to a Wired or Inc. type of publication, or you may personally be unfamiliar with the the publication, does not negate its validity within the direct selling community.

I therefore strongly object to your deletion and request it immediately be reinstated. Virgil06 (talk) 21:14, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I, too, am wondering just what you think the problem with Direct Selling News is, why you think it isn't noteworthy enough to include in the article. But cCan we continue this discussion now in the ACN Inc discussion pages? Mike (talk) 03:16, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly, but to put it short, the Virgil06 account (which, since its creation in 2007 had made two edits by Thursday morning) had created the article about Direct Selling News less than half an hour ago and no other articles were, at least at that time, linking to DSN, which made me judge the section a fairly obvious case of WP:UNDUE. But I could of course be wrong. - Tournesol (talk) 19:41, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your job?

Is it your job to watch my edits here on English Wikipedia?
How can you see my edits on English Wikipedia, just when I request a tool? /Hey Mid (contributions) 18:20, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've wasted enough time on you at Swedish Wikipedia. - Tournesol (talk) 19:35, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, so now it is time for you to waste time on me at English Wikipedia instead. Great idea! /Hey Mid (contributions) 20:06, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, the waste of time was assuming good faith at SVWP. Preventing you from getting access to tools that would allow you to waste other people's time more efficiently is damage prevention. - Tournesol (talk) 07:43, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just because you are underestimating me, doesn't mean you should prevent me from getting access to tools. My life on Swedish Wikipedia has affected English Wikipedia, which I find it unacceptible. And I can thank you for that. You are rather a Troll than a Wikipedian. /Hey Mid (contributions) 08:45, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

But it's better if I waste your time, rather than if you waste my time. /Hey Mid (contributions) 08:52, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have been improving myself on English Wikipedia, so please read the above. /Hey Mid (contributions) 08:58, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. decltype (talk) 10:02, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for notifying me, I believe you already wrap things up pretty well. - Tournesol (talk) 11:33, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You can't ask the administrators to consider blocking me on EnWp (English Wikipedia), just because I removed unnecessary questions started by myself. Please do like me: Ignore attacking me and instead continue to focus on your job on SvWp (Swedish Wikipedia) and EnWp. Thanks.

BTW: I like you. /Hey Mid (contributions) 16:00, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

I just wanted to say sorry for my attacking on you. I didn't realize it wasn't a good idea to request unblock on SvWp at EnWp. However, I have now realized I am stuck in the situation I am currently in. Thanks. /Hey Mid (contributions) 17:04, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Heymid case

Did you know Heymid filed a case on Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Edit_warring_in_user_talk_page about the conflict about having his information on your talk page.

Just as a suggestion to diffuse the issue, why don't you archive the threads between you an Heymid. The stuff will be there but not in plain sight. see Help:Archiving a talk page. Arnoutf (talk) 16:18, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, I didn't know that, but thanks for letting me know. Aren't you supposed to notify any user that you discuss in that page? Oh well, perhaps Heymid doesn't know how to read text in bold type in bright info boxes, or perhaps he thought that must notify wasn't to be interpreted literally.

Thanks for your suggestion, but I think trying to "defuse" the situation would be fruitless, since Heymid is a troll. As you may have already read elsewhere, he was blocked a few months ago at SVWP, and now he's pretending to be 13 years old in order to get sympathy, squeezing as much as he can out of WP:AGF and benefit-of-doubt while wasting as much editor and admin time as possible by asking people to fix things for him, by nominating himself for reviewer and rollback permissions (and trying to remove criticism related to these nominations), by acting as if he were an ENWP admin, by badgering SVWP admins as ENWP etc etc ad nauseam. - Tournesol (talk) 16:56, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tournesol, I have the simplest answer in the world: I am currently being in meta discussions, and doing so is not appreciated by anyone at all. If I just move on to only editing articles in the mainspace, there will be no problems. /Hey Mid (contributions) 17:47, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

General message

Hi, Tournesol! This is just a general message you don't have to reply to, but it would be greatly appreciated if you do.

I know what I have done at SVWP, and I have done many things wrong there. And yes, I have been trolling a few times. The problem was I didn't even think about a permanent block. I simply thought that if you were contributing constructively (no vandalism), you are welcome. But, I should've read sv:Wikipedia:Det är ingen rättighet att redigera på Wikipedia (English: Editing at Wikipedia is not a permission). If I had thought about my behavior at SVWP, I would probably have "skärpt mig" (pulled myself together?) and really shown who I really am.

I am a normal user, but I just want you to know I am completely aware of my behavior at SVWP, which caused my permanent block. But please, please leave me alone from ENWP now. I know I am welcomed back to SVWP in a little less than three years. I have been behaving better here during the last month or so, and I have completely stopped engaging myself in WP:SPI and reporting you at WP:AN/WP:ANI, but please focus on more constructive things than just mentoring and preventing me from getting tools at ENWP. I currently do not feel I need a mentorship from you. (Sure, if I am trolling somewhere at ENWP, feel free to revert it.)

Best regards, /Hey Mid (contributions) 12:31, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please see my answers in the section Your job? above. - Tournesol (talk) 12:48, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Trust is one thing, how people change is a different thing. What I mean is that we have to move on with our lives. I have completely stopped trolling now, and I don't understand why I would abuse the tools. Like I said above, I do not believe you are acting correctly when hunting me on ENWP, then I would never get those tools, even 3 years later. Just because you are the Swedish administrator who blocked me at SVWP, doesn't mean you have the rights to stalk me at ENWP, in order to prevent me from getting good things. I have my own, good adventure at ENWP, but it is annoying when seeing you destroy my adventure here at ENWP. Thank you for your time. /Hey Mid (contributions) 13:00, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Seeing this less than 24 hours after you begged to be unblocked and promised immediately move on to only edit articles pretty much proves my point. Thank you. - Tournesol (talk) 17:52, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Tournesol, I'm afraid I've blocked you for 48 hours because you won't leave Heymid alone. Heymid was blocked for harassing you in August and you're now doing almost exactly the same to him as he did to you. Please leave him alone. If he's in the wrong, he doesn't need you popping up at every venue to tell him so and, if he is, I will deal with it as I have in the past. Please take this time to disengage with Heymid as he has tried to do with you. You may of course appeal this block if you feel it's unjust by adding the template {{unblock|reason for unblocking}} below this message. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:06, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wow.

In the last month (and excepting my message this afternoon), I have on one (1) occasion interacted with Heymid. I told him that instead of just removing information that has a clear, explicit source, it would be better to explain why in the talk page for the concerned article, then wait for others so get a chance to respond.

During October, Heymid was blocked a third or fourth time for, well, doing what he always has and probably always will since he gets away with it. He appealed this block, the appeal was denied, then he appealed again, promising pretty much the same stuff he had promised when trying to have previous blocks lifted. I wrote nothing when he was blocked, nothing when he first appealed, nothing when the first appeal was denied, nothing when he appealed again and nothing when he was unblocked. Yet you feel that I'm popping up at every venue, and when I did write a single message at somebody else's talk page, you immediately blocked me, without any warning, without any message in my talk page.

I'm not sure if this is funny or sad or both. What I do know, however, is that I have absolutely no intent to appeal the block, so you might just as well remove my talk page access as well. - Tournesol (talk) 19:59, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tournesol, I think you're missing something here. Yes, it is true that you had been interacting with me only one time the last month before being blocked now. Also, I do realize that you have avoided commenting the other times (except now at TFOWR's talk page). However – do you have to engage in me at all? Do you have an obsession to comment on me? I did, however, accept your comment at my talk page here. However, most of your comments at me seem to focus on disparaging me. And the October 2010 cases are not the only ones – see 1, 2 and 3. There also some more which I don't want to document here.

OK, I am indefinitely/long-term blocked at the Swedish Wikipedia, but that doesn't mean you are allowed to harass me here. Also, WP:NPA says "Comment on content, not on the contributor." Finally, this time I was really close to reporting you to ANI or an administrator. I have already reported you several times, but with no success, and I never notified you or warned you, because my impression is that we simply don't mix well together.

Best regards, Hey Mid (contributions) 20:44, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

HJ, do you know approximately how many non-article namespace edits Heymid has made since the last time he was unblocked a few months ago? Do you know what percentage of the total account edits these non-article edits constitute? Do you know how many times (since the unblock) Heymid has been told not to poke his nose into discussions that don't concern him? You don't have to answer these questions, but please spend a few seconds considering them. Now to my actual question: the next time Heymid gets blocked and tries to get unblocked by promising to stick to article editing only, will you believe these promises and unblock the account?

Oh, and if you feel I'm violating some important principle by asking these questions, please feel free to block me like you did the last time. If you do, please make sure it's a very long block, since I obviously don't understand why your last block was justified. - Tournesol (talk) 09:31, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mathcad page in Swedish

Hi Tournesol, I am sorry to hear you don't like the Swedish Mathcad page, but I can assure you that this has been created by a real person, it was not machine-translated. I had asked a colleague in Sweden to provide a translation of a basic text of our product Mathcad. The text includes facts, no Marketing-information and we would like to see a basic version represented in the Swedish Wikipedia. As we have a large user base in your country, we are sure other people will pick up on it and extend it. If any of these sentences are so ugly, feel free to change them, or let me know which and I can follow up with our team in Sweden.

Thanks. Bettina — Preceding unsigned comment added by BettieGie (talk • contribs) 16:14, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Haraldwallin

Galling

Hej. Jag hoppas att du är ärlig och representerar det riktiga Wikipedia, när det gäller andra Wiki users så undrar man ibland. Jag förutsätter att du kommer att hålla dig till fakta istället för att slänga fram olika beskyllningar.

Jag har bidragit till flera artiklar med både text och även bilder på Wikipedia, se artiklar som: galling, Wear, Stress (mechanics), Adhesive wear. Efter att jag gjort mina edits har artiklarna blivit mycket bättre. Eftersom jag bidragit med mycket info ville jag precis som alla andra ha referenser till texten. Jag infoga då 2008 min rapport som reference eftersom jag inte viste att det var förbjudet.

1. Wizard 191 tog bort den reference jag satt in och bad mig fråga någon annan om de kunde läsa min rapport och avgöra om den kan vara en reference, vilket jag gjorde.

2. Någon annan läste min rapport och förde in den som reference i galling artikeln.

3. Då blev någon arg och vandaliserade reference hänvisningen till min rapport samt skrivskyddade vandaliseringen.

4. Eftersom mitt arbete kan tagit skada av vandaliseringen ville jag korrigera detta, vilket jag gjorde.

5. Då kom alla de konstiga beskyllningarna från Wizard 191 och Bob house 884.

Wizard 191 har förövrigt kommit med falska påståenden tidigare om att jag på något sätt skulle ha varit en av flera författare till mitt arbete, så som bilder med mera. Om det finna folk som påstår sig gjort mitt arbete skulle jag vilja veta vilka de är. Eftersom jag gjort som man skall borde allt återställas till original skick.

Dessutom kan det inte vara i Wikipedias intresse att dölja korrekt information på grund av antalet citat som en rapport har? Då skulle det vara omöjligt att bidra till vetenskapen för andra än enbart välsituerade personer på stora universitet? Är det verkligen sådan elitism, informationsmonopol och snedvridning av verkligheten som Wikipedia skall stå för?

--Haraldwallin (talk) 13:22, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tack, jag skall försöka framföra ditt perspektiv till den som bad mig kolla upp situationen. - Tournesol (talk) 16:16, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you do this? Varför gör du mig illa på detta sättet?

Well, the strange thing is that Tournesol|Tournesol didn’t tell me, that he was going to translate my text from Swedish to English.

It´s a violation against me to make a improper translation whiteout telling me.

Of course it’s offending when people do fake and false interpretations of my text.

Why did TransporterMan ask for Swedish-language help, when the translation from Swedish to English is fake?

I’m not offended by the policies of Wikipedia, because I demonstrably followed them.

Consensus may change, but it’s not consensus to remove or vandalize something without cause.

TransporterMan conclude that Harald Wallin didn’t include his theses as a reference so why remove when the reference doesn’t violate the policies of Wikipedia? --Haraldwallin (talk) 16:37, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Varför talade du inte om att du skulle översätta texten med egna kommentarer osv..

Jämför min text med din översättning. Din text innehåller många egna tolkningar och kommentarer vars utgångspunkt är att objektifiera mig som skribent och vars kontext mycket lätt kan tolkas som extremt nedvärderande.

Dessutom, varför talade du inte om att du skulle översätta texten?
Är du verkligen övertygad om att det du gjort var fint och trevligt?

Jag kan tillräckligt mycket engelska för att klara av att skriva själv, eftersom det bevisligen blir mer korrekt och dessutom inte innehåller knepiga kommentarer på det sätt som du bidragit med i din översättning.

Om du inte inser att det du gjort är ett stort fel och att du varit elak mot mig, så är det tragiskt och bevisar min ståndpunkt att majoriteten i denna diskussion saknar egenkännedom och endast letar efter fel hos mig eller i det jag skrivit.

Alla mina argument är sanna, men de ignoreras helt utan kommentar. Istället hänvisas till någon kryptisk formell andledning som inte har stöd i Wikipedias stadgar.

Era åtgärder att ta bort min rapport som referens gör inte artikeln bättre, snarare förhindras den intresserade att ta reda på underliggande fakta.
Varför är det så viktigt att förhindra spridning av denna viktiga information?

Om det är så att någon hackat sig in på mitt konto och ändrat så ni inte kan läsa det jag skrivit, ja då kan jag förstå att den här situationen har uppstått.
Men det är troligen osannolikt och ert handlande är inte drivet av okunskap.

När jag gjorde mitt arbete på universitetet uppkom exakt samma mentalitet och gruppdynamiska självbedrägeri, troligen driven av ett egenintresse i botten, samt känslan av tillfredställelse av att ha makt att bestämma andras framgång eller kunna göra det jobbigt för mig.

Om mina teorier om de bakomliggande orsakerna är sanna, så kommer du att reagera på detta meddelande efter ett förutbestämt mönster i samklang med tidigare reaktioner. --Haraldwallin (talk) 12:22, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Gratis, du bekräftade bara mina farhågor och svarade exakt så som jag trodde du skulle svara.
Congratulations, your reply is in alignment with everything I would expect from someone with bad intentions.

I did reply on your question, your translation is false due to incompatibility between what I wrote and what you wrote in English and claim I wrote in Swedish.

Example: Since he had added a lot of information, he wanted to add references and used his report from 2008 (another possible interpretation is that he in 2008 added a reference to his thesis/report)(again, not clear who)(Haraldwallin's choice of word) (unsure whether Haraldwallin refers to the Wikipedia article or to the thesis/report) (but I don't believe this addresses the current case)
More example: Wizard 191 har förövrigt kommit med falska påståenden tidigare om att jag på något sätt skulle ha varit en av flera författare till mitt arbete, så som bilder med mera. Om det finns folk som påstår sig gjort mitt arbete skulle jag vilja veta vilka de är. Eftersom jag gjort som man skall borde allt återställas till original skick.Dessutom kan det inte vara i Wikipedias intresse att dölja korrekt information på grund av antalet citat som en rapport har? Då skulle det vara omöjligt att bidra till vetenskapen för andra än enbart välsituerade personer på stora universitet? Är det verkligen sådan elitism, informationsmonopol och snedvridning av verkligheten som Wikipedia skall stå för Moreover, Wizard 191 has earlier presented false accusations about Haraldwallin being one of several writers behind his work such as images etcetera. If there are other people that claim to have written Haraldwallin's work, he would like to know who they are. Since Haraldwallin has done everything by the book, everything should be restored to the original state. Furthermore it shouldn't be of useful for Wikipedia to hide correct information due to the number of citations in a report/thesis? If so, it would be impossible for anyone except well-off people in major universities to contribute to science. Is this kind of elitism, information monopoly and distortion of reality something that Wikipedia should be part of?

It´s pretty clear your translation is not correct in the scenes of context and of what I meant or intended to write, excluded your own comments.
Your biggest fault is that you didn’t tell me you where going to translate my text!! Why didn’t you tell me in advance?
If you wanted to help me, why did you do this strange translation?

You also produce a very degrading lie, I haven’t wrote anything about, and I quote: “that it had to be some sort of conspiracy”!!!, perhaps you just made a Freudian statement? I might be wrong about that and perhaps you know =)
(Freudian statement = your reflection unmask your inner intentions)

You are Swedish and It’s probable you have some sort of motivation to write the comments in English. But I prefer you would have the guts to answer my points, instead of trying to vessel your way out of your own blunder.

--Haraldwallin (talk) 11:19, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Do not hide facts!!! It is a violation against all that Wikipedia stands for

If you don´t agree to the written facts, try improve the facts by altering the text. Do not hide facts!!! To hide facts is a violation against all that Wikipedia stands for. I´m surprised that Wikipedia doesn’t through you out from it’s network

--Haraldwallin (talk) 14:36, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your attempts to market your thesis has nothing to do with presenting facts. If you don't want to follow the Wikipedia guidlines and the pieces of advice given to you, then don't edit Wikipedia articles. Get your own home page or blog or whatever. - Tournesol (talk) 15:13, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Try to improve Wikipedia by writing your own correct facts and do not delet other "correct facts"

Sorry my work acknowledge the fact and summons the acceleration vector which “attributes” are 1dim, and the mass as a 3dim function, there are no references in my report who include the same information.

This small change in the handling of entities in Newtons F=ma is my contribution to the world of science.

If you where a bit interested you would also realize the wonderful things this notion will bring.

(But of course it can also release destructive power and deteriorate a lot of egos)--Haraldwallin (talk) 16:36, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Don´t hide information, improve Wikipedia by writing facts and do not delete "correct facts"

Sorry my work acknowledge the fact and summons the acceleration vector which “attributes” are 1dim, and the mass as a 3dim function, there are no references in my report who include the same information. This small change in the handling of entities in Newtons F=ma is my contribution to the world of science. If you where a bit interested you would also realize the wonderful things this notion will bring. (But of course it can also release destructive power and deteriorate a lot of egos--Haraldwallin (talk) 16:35, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A one-dimensional vector isn't a vector, Harald, it's a scalar. I thought you had studied university level Mathematics? - Tournesol (talk) 16:41, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It´s bad English to write a double genitive “Of….Of…..”, thought you Tournesol have gone through class 4-6 in Swedish ground school (svenska grund skolan).

It´s pretty funny when you make a perfectly good text worse with your changes, and it wasn’t even my text =)

--Haraldwallin (talk) 17:30, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There's this expression about a pot and a kettle... - Tournesol (talk) 17:33, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think you aren’t a bit interested in improving Wikipedia with facts because if you were interested you would also realize the wonderful things my scientific report points out. Wikipedias rules are the following “it´s ok to use your own work if it´s benefits others.”

You must prove my report and explanation about acceleration in plastic deformation false, then it doesn’t benefit anyone and my report can be deleted as a reference.

Please prove me wrong, I’m interested in you ability to match mathematical models and the reality.

--Haraldwallin (talk) 17:43, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Apropå scalär kontra vector. Acceleration är en vektor, scalär är storleken på accelerations vektorn i en viss punkt. Varför skall jag alltid träffa på besserwissrar som klagar men aldrig har rätt =)(Jag skriver på svenska så du förstår) --Haraldwallin (talk) 17:56, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm perfectly aware of the difference between a scalar (which, by the way, is written skalär in Swedish, not scalär), what I found odd was your ...as a 1dim vector..." above. - Tournesol (talk) 18:44, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The questions is if the system must be handled mathematically discrete or as a continues system.

The system is either handled mathematically discrete or as a continues system.

The acceleration vectors “attributes” are 1dim and mathematically present in every point if it´s a continues system. The mass attributes are always 3dim. --Haraldwallin (talk) 19:24, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Don´t hide correct information, instead help people get access to it

Hi Tournesol, Wikipedia have never been about consensus. Wikipedia is about making new correct and useful information public for a brooder amount of people quicker and within a shorter time interval than ordinary dictionaries.
This means researchers with a specific knowledge may help other people get access to it and speedup the expansion of the world mainstream knowledge. I think you agree It´s a god deed to share information even if this knowledge is regarded new for the ordinary layman and in the forefront of science.
Wikipedia has never been about satisfying some perverse peoples needs to act as deputies for bureaucratic hegemonies. For example, It will be impossible to incorporate pictures in Wikipedia if you can’t give away your own pictures and include your own work as a reference to the same pictures.
And do you Tournesol really think any researcher can write an scientific article which isn’t based on his or her own knowledge including research? --Haraldwallin (talk) 13:49, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think you care at all about what Wikipedia is or isn't about. You're just hell-bent on getting a reference to your own thesis into Wikipedia, to make yourself feel like an important researcher. - Tournesol (talk) 14:40, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That was not joke

You removed my good edit( http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chulpan_Khamatova&action=historysubmit&diff=457514434&oldid=445873239 --94.228.193.11 (talk) 22:43, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]