User talk:Tomtomn00/Archives/18

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

This user is in school.

This user is taking a wikibreak and may be away or inactive for varying periods of time.
Although they may occasionally be able to do some editing, messages left for them may not be replied to for a while.
They will be back on Wikipedia when school is over.

User:Tomtomn00/tomtalk

Millennium (TV series)

Why? Regards, --Klemen Kocjancic (talk) 16:53, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-existant category. Create category then add back in. ~ ⇒TomTom N00 @ 16:55, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please check and correct your mistake. Regards, --Klemen Kocjancic (talk) 17:01, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I did check and the Category was created 4 minutes after I reverted the edit. ~ ⇒TomTom N00 @ 17:04, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment on my Request for Rollback

You commented on my Request for Rollback that some of my reversions seemed to be against good-faith edits. For my own education, could you point to a few of those? I certainly want to be better at recognizing the difference. —Al E. ^(talk) 19:12, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Here's one [1] - you undid a Good Faith edit, which did not contain vandalism, maybe it contained errors, but please mark as AGF next time. Other than that, I support you getting Rollback. ~ ⇒TomTom N00 @ 19:15, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That particular edit resulted in a significant re-write of the article and removed virtually all wikilinks and all of the category links. It seems to me that someone was pasting their school report into the article. It wasn't obvious vandalism, but it was pretty destructive. I should have said as much in the change log. Thanks. —Al E. ^(talk) 19:27, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Thanks, ~ ⇒TomTom N00 @ 19:28, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi :Tomtomn00,

you seem to be asking for every kind of access and capability there is. So rather than doing your requests behind the scenes, use the appropriate page to request the capability. The latest thing you requested I do not even know what it is, so that is why it is best to use the right request page, then the experts on that thing can give it a consideration and explain aspects about it to you. There are plenty of things to do here without special privileges. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:53, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please could you respond to my email. The right I had requested was a mistake - instead of -Page I put -User. ~ ⇒TomTom N00 @ 22:35, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the readership of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High .

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!


Stubs		Cleanup
	Perieres		1957 1000 km Buenos Aires
	Juz'		Isao Inokuma
	Cycling at the 2008 Summer Paralympics – Men's 1km time trial (B&VI 1–3)		2006 FIA GT Dijon 500km
	Galileo's Leaning Tower of Pisa experiment	Merge
	Atomic Dog (film)		Street cricket
	Tokyo FM		Blame It
	Elizabeth Adare		The Nave Choir
	Huarmey	Add sources
	Roman Catholic Diocese of Springfield-Cape Girardeau		Minecraft Xbox 360 Edition
	Madison Welch		Aasumetsa
	Return merchandise authorization		Rutja
	Sakussaare	Wikify
	Amir Abdollah Tahmasebi		Simeon Bellison
	Dendropsophus microcephalus		St. Agnes Cathedral (Kyoto)
	1979 IMSA GT Championship season		Mali grad
	Shoal Creek Golf and Country Club	Expand
	Tiouraren Formation		Mullingar (Parliament of Ireland constituency)
	Peel Cathedral		Italian general election, 2008 (Sicily)
	Cathedral of Saints Simon and Jude		Adrian Lucas

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:17, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cathedral article

I just deleted the picture that you added, and thought I ought perhaps give you a reason.

There are hundreds of cathedrals in the world and hundreds of pictures on Wiki Commons to choose from.
The pictures have been selected on a couple of criteria.

Format and appearance

Fitting the adjacent text.

In order to fit in a great number of representative examples, the pics are all "landscape". This creates a harmony in the overall appearance
Every picture has both appearance and a caption that relates to the text of the section.

e.g. the image of Pisa Cathedral is placed in the section on "tourism" and to serve that purpose, out f all the possible images, the one has been chose that is both of very high quality, is landscape, and has a tourist horse-drawn carriage in front of it.

The pictures are not about the greatness of the cathedral as a work of architecture, because that is not the subject of the article. The article is about how cathedrals function and what takes place there.

To illustrate that purpose, every cathedral, great or small, is equally valid.

I have tried to spread the illustrative material across the world, representing every continent. I think Africa might have missed out. However, England has weighed in rather heavily, as there are more pictures of English cathedrals available than any others.

Amandajm (talk) 05:45, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Article tagging

Tomtomn00, I've brought up multiple issues with your article tagging previously and I still have concerns (despite you now having a mentor). Could you please explain why you tagged this article as having unreliable sources? It would certainly be helpful if you're going to throw up vague tags on articles if you could at least explain your concerns on the talk page or leave a detailed edit summary. --Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 17:23, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Also, if you keep being consumed about unimportant stats such as this as opposed to accuracy and the actual improvement of articles, I expect you will find your time here quite frustrating. Wikipedia is about building an encyclopedia, not ratcheting up your edit count in the shortest possible time period. I understand that you are young, however there is a level of competence that is required in order to edit, and I'm concerned that although you have enthusiasm, you are not quite ready for the tasks you're taking on. --Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 17:31, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

They do not contain easily accessable information, and are just citations. ~ ⇒TomTom N00 @ 17:28, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Could you point me to the part of Wikipedia's reliable sourcing policy where it states sources must be easily accessible? Do you realize this individual died in 1785? The second part of your explanation makes no sense - the citations are unreliable because they are "just citations"? Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 17:37, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I see your point now. Rolled back my edit. Sorry, ~ ⇒TomTom N00 @ 17:56, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiThanks

You are among the top 5% of most active Wikipedians this month! 66.87.0.115 (talk) 20:26, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]