Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback

Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Yunshui (talk | contribs) at 07:33, 15 October 2012 (→‎User:Go Phightins!). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Rollback

(add requestview requests)


Reason for requesting rollback Proggyponydubsteppers (talk) 09:54, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to have the Rollback permission to use Huggle for dealing with vandalism.

 Not done. With only 58 edits and only 40 of these to articles and very few of these concerned with vandalism, it is not possible for us to measure your knowledge of policies and tools. Please apply again when you have made made several hundred edits and we have something to measure. You may also wish to visit WP:CVUA to see what we have available for training on counter-vandalism. Thanks. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:28, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Most of my edits on Wikipedia relate to the removal of vandalism, and I have been a Wikipedian for over a year. I was formerly a rollbacker, but lost it due to liberal use. 1966batfan (talk) 03:03, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I am having a very slow computer, which takes more than 2 minutes to reload (to be precise, the basic texts etc. loads within a dozen seconds, but the extensions like Twinkle, edit tool bar, ProveIt and popups loads later after some minutes.). I tried to use popups but that, when used by some one with slow computer like mine, may produce unintended results like this and this. Just a couple of months before, I built up a watchtower [1], but having a slow computer, it has not been used up to its full potential. If given this right then I can easily defend obvious vandalism from recent changes. (FYI: Valchemishnu, Vanischenu at some institutions and Vanischenu from public computers are my alternate accounts. Of course, they have contributed almost nothing, just provided the links for transparency as I do not have a userpage yet to list them.···Vanischenu「m/Talk」 06:42, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I have amassed about 3300 edits, at least a third of which (by my estimation) are reverting vandalism. I am interested in at least investigating Huggle and/or Stiki and to do either, Rollback is required. Thanks. Go Phightins! 01:14, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Done I see one or two slightly over-enthusiastic uses of Twinkle's "vandalism" rollback (e.g. [2], [3]), but the overwhelming majority of reverts look fine. Rollback is yours, handle with care. Yunshui  07:33, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]