Talk:Deborah Tannen
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Earlier books
Does anyone have info about Dr. Tannen's earlier books? 218.61.32.9 03:06, 18 Aug 2003 (UTC)
Report Vs. Rapport
Report Vs. Rapport Talk Theory should be mentioned. User
Fair use rationale for Image:Deborah Tannen.jpg
Image:Deborah Tannen.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 04:59, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Vandalism
I'm having a hard time finding these three edits serious: [1], [2], [3], the last one at least because its from the same ip. They had however not completely been detected, so I cleaned it up as good as I could: [4]. --78.82.196.231 (talk) 07:44, 7 January 2009 (UTC) (sv:user:flinga)
Male Bashing And Other Unscientific Writings ==
This article does not mention that D.T. has come under fire from her own peers for conducting anti-scientific research that is hateful towards women. She has written things such as to say that men take over internet pages that are geared towards women. She based this opinion on her observations of the early days of the internet and her own perceptions of what she considered a masculine vs a feminine internet page.
- Biography articles of living people
- Start-Class biography articles
- Start-Class biography (science and academia) articles
- Low-importance biography (science and academia) articles
- Science and academia work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Unassessed psychology articles
- Unknown-importance psychology articles
- WikiProject Psychology articles
- Start-Class Linguistics articles
- Unknown-importance Linguistics articles
- Start-Class applied linguistics articles
- Applied Linguistics Task Force articles
- Automatically assessed Linguistics articles
- WikiProject Linguistics articles