Talk:Brazil
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Brazil article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17Auto-archiving period: 91 days |
Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Brazil article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17Auto-archiving period: 91 days |
Template:VA Template:Outline of knowledge coverage
Brazil was one of the Geography and places good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on September 7, 2004, September 7, 2005, September 7, 2006, September 7, 2007, September 7, 2008, September 7, 2009, and November 15, 2012. |
|
|||||||||||||||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 91 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Italian Brazilians
I think this article should be more democratic. It should describe the real brazilian population, composed by indigenous people, brown, black, asians, middle east and europeans (mainly portuguese). We can´t ignore that Brazil has the one of the largest italian settlement of the world, but we should show pictures that reflect the diversity of the brazilian population.
Edit request
I would like to include the ranking next to the GDP in the "Infobox country".
GDP_nominal_rank = 7th (or 8th depending on the source)
Does a largest cities template/city population template add value to the articles about nations (esp. featured ones)?
This is an open invitation for participating in the RFC about "does a largest cities template/city population template add value to the articles about nations (esp. featured ones)?" Comment on the page WP:RFC/City population templates. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! Mrt3366(Talk?) (New thread?) 14:46, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
Independence
The infobox has the United Kingdom of Portugal, Brazil and the Algarves listed as who it got independence from, but considering that Brazil was an integral part of the UKPBA, how could it have gotten independence from itself? Shouldn't we list Kingdom of Portugal and the Algarves? It was Portugal's name before Brazil's accension to royal union and the name after Brazil's independence. It makes sense to me, but I ask what you all think. Thank you, Cristiano Tomás (talk) 05:05, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
- No. The state Brazil separated from was the UKPBA, which is the official name of the political entity. By way of comparison, Croatia was a constituent part of Yugoslavia, and became independent of Yugoslavia, not of Serbia-Montenegro-Macedonia. Walrasiad (talk) 15:57, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
Size
A discussion that was already in the past regarding this article is about the weight of this page and the brief character that a encyclopedic article must have.
So, it never hurts to ask again to all colaborators (especially Thiagoreis Leon) to try keep this article as lean as possible, leaving to the subthemes mentioned, all related details.
Since a single photo/image per section is more than enough to serve as an illustration of a subject, I also suggest that if the intention is renovation of images, that they may be replaced every quarter, and not that new ones be added, which just let the page heavier.
Cybershore (talk) 05:07, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
Origin of the name Brazil
It is often said and widely believed that the name Brazil derives from the dyewood 'Brasil wood' which was the country´s main export product in the period immediately following discovery by the Portuguese. However, this does not explain why the dyewood was called 'Brasil wood'. A more plausible explanation is that Brazil was identified by early Portuguese settlers as the mythical island of Brazil believed by mariners to be located far out in the western Atlantic. An expedition of merchants from the English port of Bristol sailed in search of the island of Brazil in the late fifteenth century, well before Cabral´s landfall so the name clearly predates the discovery of both Brazil and the dyewood found there. 201.29.234.103 (talk) 17:07, 8 January 2013 (UTC)Gervase Shorter gshorter@kinetics.com.br
- Apparently brasilwood derives from the Portuguese "brasa" (ember) in reference to the wood's natural red hue. --Daniel(talk) 18:56, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
Misleading
There is a part of this article that, in my point of view is considered to be misleading.
The indigenous did not sell the "pau-brasil", or traded it, the "pau-brasil" was thoroughly explored and extinct by the europeans. There wasn't any type of harvest, as it is implied by the text. On the contrary, actually, "pau-brasil" was a native plant existant in the forests and spreaded, there weren't any kinds of plantation or planned culture.
12:26, 10 January 2013 (UTC) Manuela Pirotelli
Edit request on 12 January 2013 Brazil
It is requested that an edit be made to the semi-protected article at Brazil. (edit · history · last · links · protection log)
This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y".
The edit may be made by any autoconfirmed user. Remember to change the |
Hello Editors for Brazil page,
My Zns Smith and I would like to request to edit info on Brazil’s page. This additional text I have provides important overlooked historical facts regarding Brazil. Thank you.
- Delisted good articles
- Former good article nominees
- B-Class Brazil articles
- Top-importance Brazil articles
- WikiProject Brazil articles
- WikiProject templates with unknown parameters
- B-Class country articles
- WikiProject Countries articles
- B-Class Latin America articles
- Top-importance Latin America articles
- Latin America articles
- B-Class South America articles
- Top-importance South America articles
- WikiProject South America articles
- Selected anniversaries (September 2004)
- Selected anniversaries (September 2005)
- Selected anniversaries (September 2006)
- Selected anniversaries (September 2007)
- Selected anniversaries (September 2008)
- Selected anniversaries (September 2009)
- Selected anniversaries (November 2012)
- Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests